Lawson Wulsin1, Toni Alterman, P Timothy Bushnell, Jia Li, Rui Shen. 1. Department of Psychiatry, Cincinnati Veterans Administration Medical Center, University of Cincinnati, P.O. Box 670559, Cincinnati, OH, 45267-0559, USA, lawson.wulsin@uc.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To estimate and interpret differences in depression prevalence rates among industries, using a large, group medical claims database. METHODS: Depression cases were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis code in a population of 214,413 individuals employed during 2002-2005 by employers based in western Pennsylvania. Data were provided by Highmark, Inc. (Pittsburgh and Camp Hill, PA). Rates were adjusted for age, gender, and employee share of health care costs. National industry measures of psychological distress, work stress, and physical activity at work were also compiled from other data sources. RESULTS: Rates for clinical depression in 55 industries ranged from 6.9 to 16.2 %, (population rate = 10.45 %). Industries with the highest rates tended to be those which, on the national level, require frequent or difficult interactions with the public or clients, and have high levels of stress and low levels of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is needed to help identify industries with relatively high rates of depression in other regions and on the national level, and to determine whether these differences are due in part to specific work stress exposures and physical inactivity at work. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Claims database analyses may provide a cost-effective way to identify priorities for depression treatment and prevention in the workplace.
PURPOSE: To estimate and interpret differences in depression prevalence rates among industries, using a large, group medical claims database. METHODS:Depression cases were identified by ICD-9 diagnosis code in a population of 214,413 individuals employed during 2002-2005 by employers based in western Pennsylvania. Data were provided by Highmark, Inc. (Pittsburgh and Camp Hill, PA). Rates were adjusted for age, gender, and employee share of health care costs. National industry measures of psychological distress, work stress, and physical activity at work were also compiled from other data sources. RESULTS: Rates for clinical depression in 55 industries ranged from 6.9 to 16.2 %, (population rate = 10.45 %). Industries with the highest rates tended to be those which, on the national level, require frequent or difficult interactions with the public or clients, and have high levels of stress and low levels of physical activity. CONCLUSIONS: Additional research is needed to help identify industries with relatively high rates of depression in other regions and on the national level, and to determine whether these differences are due in part to specific work stress exposures and physical inactivity at work. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Claims database analyses may provide a cost-effective way to identify priorities for depression treatment and prevention in the workplace.
Authors: Andrea D Furlan; William H Gnam; Nancy Carnide; Emma Irvin; Benjamin C Amick; Kelly DeRango; Robert McMaster; Kimberley Cullen; Tesha Slack; Sandra Brouwer; Ute Bültmann Journal: J Occup Rehabil Date: 2012-09
Authors: Roxana C Chicas; Lisa Elon; Madelyn C Houser; Abby Mutic; Estefani Ignacio Gallegos; Daniel J Smith; Lori Modly; Nezahualcoyotl Xiuhtecutli; Vicki S Hertzberg; Joan Flocks; Jeff M Sands; Linda McCauley Journal: J Immigr Minor Health Date: 2022-01-06
Authors: Gillian Weston; Afshin Zilanawala; Elizabeth Webb; Livia A Carvalho; Anne McMunn Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Matthew L Romo; Gavin George; Joanne E Mantell; Eva Mwai; Eston Nyaga; Michael Strauss; Jacob O Odhiambo; Kaymarlin Govender; Elizabeth A Kelvin Journal: PeerJ Date: 2019-07-18 Impact factor: 2.984