Literature DB >> 29893781

Associations of Tipped and Untipped Service Work With Poor Mental Health in a Nationally Representative Cohort of Adolescents Followed Into Adulthood.

Sarah B Andrea1, Lynne C Messer1, Miguel Marino1,2, Janne Boone-Heinonen1.   

Abstract

Precarious work is concentrated in the service industry in the United States and is a risk factor for poor mental health. Service occupations in which workers receive tips are potentially more precarious due to unstable schedule and income, and lack of benefits. We tested hypotheses that individuals working in tipped service occupations have greater odds of experiencing poor mental health (as indicated by self-reported depression, sleep problems, and/or greater perceived stress) relative to individuals in untipped service and nonservice occupations, using cross-sectional data from wave IV of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health data set (2007-2008; age range, 24-33 years). To improve comparability of occupation types, propensity scores were computed as a function of childhood factors, then used to construct a sample of 2,815 women and 2,586 men. In gender-stratified multivariable regression, women in tipped service had greater odds of reporting a depression diagnosis or symptoms relative to women in nonservice work (odds ratio = 1.61; 95% confidence interval: 1.11, 2.34). Associations of similar magnitude for sleep problems and perceived stress were observed among women but were not statistically significant; all associations were close to the null among men. Additional research is necessary to understand the factors that underlie differences in poor mental health in tipped and untipped service versus nonservice workers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29893781      PMCID: PMC6166209          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwy123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  20 in total

1.  Results of multivariable logistic regression, propensity matching, propensity adjustment, and propensity-based weighting under conditions of nonuniform effect.

Authors:  Tobias Kurth; Alexander M Walker; Robert J Glynn; K Arnold Chan; J Michael Gaziano; Klaus Berger; James M Robins
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-21       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Service with a smile: do emotional intelligence, gender, and autonomy moderate the emotional labor process?

Authors:  Hazel-Anne M Johnson; Paul E Spector
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2007-10

3.  Effects of customer entitlement on service workers' physical and psychological well-being: a study of waitstaff employees.

Authors:  Glenda M Fisk; Lukas B Neville
Journal:  J Occup Health Psychol       Date:  2011-10

4.  Enhanced female attractiveness with use of cosmetics and male tipping behavior in restaurants.

Authors:  Nicolas Guéguen; Celine Jacob
Journal:  J Cosmet Sci       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 0.948

5.  Poverty dynamics and parental mental health: Determinants of childhood mental health in the UK.

Authors:  Emla Fitzsimons; Alissa Goodman; Elaine Kelly; James P Smith
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Hooked on a feeling: emotional labor as an occupational hazard of the post-industrial age.

Authors:  Bonnie K Andrews; Susan Karcz; Beth Rosenberg
Journal:  New Solut       Date:  2008

Review 7.  Emotional labor: relevant theory for occupational health practice in post-industrial America.

Authors:  Arnold B de Castro; Jacqueline Agnew; Sheila T Fitzgerald
Journal:  AAOHN J       Date:  2004-03

8.  Workplace Policies and Mental Health among Working-Class, New Parents.

Authors:  Maureen Perry-Jenkins; JuliAnna Z Smith; Lauren Page Wadsworth; Hillary Paul Halpern
Journal:  Community Work Fam       Date:  2016-11-10

9.  Bad Jobs, Bad Health? How Work and Working Conditions Contribute to Health Disparities.

Authors:  Sarah A Burgard; Katherine Y Lin
Journal:  Am Behav Sci       Date:  2013-08

10.  The forgotten realm of the new and emerging psychosocial risk factors.

Authors:  Francesco Chirico
Journal:  J Occup Health       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 2.708

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.