Literature DB >> 7171691

Analysis of covariance and standardization as instances of prediction.

P W Lane, J A Nelder.   

Abstract

In this paper, prediction provides the basis for unifying the procedures of covariances adjustment and standardization. Analysis of covariance is a method of forming predictions from a linear model; it is used when qualitative effects are to be studied and the effects of continuous variables are to be adjusted for. An essential feature is the division into effects of interest and effects for which adjustment is required. Covariates may also be qualitative: as such, they are used implicitly in experimental designs with blocks, where treatment effects are adjusted for the effect of blocks. The technique of standardization is well-known in epidemiology and demography as a method of adjusting explicitly for qualitative effects. The same division of effects applies when an analysis that uses generalized linear models is summarized. Two distinct types of prediction, which give identical results in classical linear models, are available: prediction may be conditional on a fixed value of a covariate, or marginal on a distribution of values such as the distribution in the set of data being analysed. Prediction methods are illustrated by the analysis of a table of proportions by use of a logit model.

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7171691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  59 in total

1.  Screening mammography use among current, former, and never hormone therapy users may not explain recent declines in breast cancer incidence.

Authors:  Diana S M Buist; Rod Walker; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Patricia A Carney; Stephen H Taplin; Tracy Onega; Karla Kerlikowske; Walter Clinton; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  The prevalence of mental disorders in rural office practice.

Authors:  J T Philbrick; J E Connelly; A B Wofford
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Comparative effectiveness of digital versus film-screen mammography in community practice in the United States: a cohort study.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Rebecca A Hubbard; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Constance D Lehman; Stephen H Taplin; Edward A Sickles
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Cumulative probability of false-positive recall or biopsy recommendation after 10 years of screening mammography: a cohort study.

Authors:  Rebecca A Hubbard; Karla Kerlikowske; Chris I Flowers; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Weiwei Zhu; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Trends in the sex ratio of California births, 1960-1996.

Authors:  Daniel Smith; Julie Von Behren
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Occupational and other risk factors for hand-grip strength: the Honolulu-Asia Aging Study.

Authors:  L E Charles; C M Burchfiel; D Fekedulegn; M L Kashon; G W Ross; W T Sanderson; H Petrovitch
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Effects of payment changes on trends in post-acute care.

Authors:  Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin; Carrie Hoverman Colla; José J Escarce
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 3.402

8.  What's the Risk? A simple approach for estimating adjusted risk measures from nonlinear models including logistic regression.

Authors:  Lawrence C Kleinman; Edward C Norton
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 3.402

9.  Association between C-reactive protein and QTc interval in middle-aged men and women.

Authors:  Eunhee Kim; SoonJae Joo; Jinyoung Kim; JeongCheon Ahn; JeHyeong Kim; Kuchan Kimm; Chol Shin
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2006-10-27       Impact factor: 8.082

10.  Colorectal Cancer Screening Rates Increased after Exposure to the Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH).

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Laura Mae Baldwin; Leah Tuzzio; Sheryl Catz; Alison Cole; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Med       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.657

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.