Manuel Cifuentes1, Jon Boyer, David A Lombardi, Laura Punnett. 1. Center for Disability Research at Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, Massachusetts 01748, USA. manuel.cifuentes@libertymutual.com
Abstract
BACKGROUND: O*NET is a publicly available online database that describes occupational features across US job titles and that has been used to estimate workplace physical and psychosocial exposures and organizational characteristics. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the use of O*NET as a job exposure matrix. METHODS: A review of the peer-reviewed published and gray literature was conducted. Twenty-eight studies were found that used O*NET to estimate work exposures related to health or safety outcomes. Each was systematically evaluated across eight main features. RESULTS: Many health outcomes have been studied with O*NET estimates of job exposures. Some studies did not use conceptual definitions of exposure; few studies estimated convergent validity, most used predictive validity. Multilevel analysis was underutilized. CONCLUSION: O*NET is worthy of exploration by the occupational health community, although its scientific value is still undetermined. More studies could eventually provide evidence of convergent validity. O*NET has the potential to allow examination of occupational risks that might have otherwise been ignored due to missing data or resource constraints on field data collection of job exposure information. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: O*NET is a publicly available online database that describes occupational features across US job titles and that has been used to estimate workplace physical and psychosocial exposures and organizational characteristics. The aim of this review is to describe and evaluate the use of O*NET as a job exposure matrix. METHODS: A review of the peer-reviewed published and gray literature was conducted. Twenty-eight studies were found that used O*NET to estimate work exposures related to health or safety outcomes. Each was systematically evaluated across eight main features. RESULTS: Many health outcomes have been studied with O*NET estimates of job exposures. Some studies did not use conceptual definitions of exposure; few studies estimated convergent validity, most used predictive validity. Multilevel analysis was underutilized. CONCLUSION: O*NET is worthy of exploration by the occupational health community, although its scientific value is still undetermined. More studies could eventually provide evidence of convergent validity. O*NET has the potential to allow examination of occupational risks that might have otherwise been ignored due to missing data or resource constraints on field data collection of job exposure information. (c) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Laura J Lee; Elaine Symanski; Philip J Lupo; Sarah C Tinker; Hilda Razzaghi; Lisa A Pompeii; Adrienne T Hoyt; Mark A Canfield; Wenyaw Chan Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2015-12-17 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Laura A McClure; William G LeBlanc; Cristina A Fernandez; Lora E Fleming; David J Lee; Kevin J Moore; Alberto J Caban-Martinez Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2017-05 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: Kaori Fujishiro; Leslie A MacDonald; Michael Crowe; Leslie A McClure; Virginia J Howard; Virginia G Wadley Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2019-09-15 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Ann Marie Dale; Angelique Zeringue; Carisa Harris-Adamson; David Rempel; Stephen Bao; Matthew S Thiese; Linda Merlino; Susan Burt; Jay Kapellusch; Arun Garg; Fred Gerr; Kurt T Hegmann; Ellen A Eisen; Bradley Evanoff Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Toni Alterman; Sara E Luckhaupt; James M Dahlhamer; Brian W Ward; Geoffrey M Calvert Journal: Am J Ind Med Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 2.214
Authors: Zeeshan Qureshi; David Ramsey; Jennifer R Kramer; Lawrence Whitehead; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2013-02-05 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Kaori Fujishiro; Ana V Diez-Roux; Paul A Landsbergis; Nancy Swords Jenny; Teresa Seeman Journal: Occup Environ Med Date: 2013-05-18 Impact factor: 4.402