Drew Scoles1, Yusufu N Sulai2, Christopher S Langlo3, Gerald A Fishman4, Christine A Curcio5, Joseph Carroll6, Alfredo Dubra7. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States. 2. The Institute of Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, United States. 3. Departments of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 4. The Pangere Center for Inherited Retinal Diseases at the Chicago Lighthouse for People Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired, Chicago, Illinois, United States Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, United States. 5. Department of Ophthalmology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, United States. 6. Departments of Cell Biology, Neurobiology, and Anatomy, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States. 7. Department of Ophthalmology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: An often overlooked prerequisite to cone photoreceptor gene therapy development is residual photoreceptor structure that can be rescued. While advances in adaptive optics (AO) retinal imaging have recently enabled direct visualization of individual cone and rod photoreceptors in the living human retina, these techniques largely detect strongly directionally-backscattered (waveguided) light from normal intact photoreceptors. This represents a major limitation in using existing AO imaging to quantify structure of remnant cones in degenerating retina. METHODS: Photoreceptor inner segment structure was assessed with a novel AO scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) differential phase technique, that we termed nonconfocal split-detector, in two healthy subjects and four subjects with achromatopsia. Ex vivo preparations of five healthy donor eyes were analyzed for comparison of inner segment diameter to that measured in vivo with split-detector AOSLO. RESULTS: Nonconfocal split-detector AOSLO reveals the photoreceptor inner segment with or without the presence of a waveguiding outer segment. The diameter of inner segments measured in vivo is in good agreement with histology. A substantial number of foveal and parafoveal cone photoreceptors with apparently intact inner segments were identified in patients with the inherited disease achromatopsia. CONCLUSIONS: The application of nonconfocal split-detector to emerging human gene therapy trials will improve the potential of therapeutic success, by identifying patients with sufficient retained photoreceptor structure to benefit the most from intervention. Additionally, split-detector imaging may be useful for studies of other retinal degenerations such as AMD, retinitis pigmentosa, and choroideremia where the outer segment is lost before the remainder of the photoreceptor cell. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
PURPOSE: An often overlooked prerequisite to cone photoreceptor gene therapy development is residual photoreceptor structure that can be rescued. While advances in adaptive optics (AO) retinal imaging have recently enabled direct visualization of individual cone and rod photoreceptors in the living human retina, these techniques largely detect strongly directionally-backscattered (waveguided) light from normal intact photoreceptors. This represents a major limitation in using existing AO imaging to quantify structure of remnant cones in degenerating retina. METHODS: Photoreceptor inner segment structure was assessed with a novel AO scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) differential phase technique, that we termed nonconfocal split-detector, in two healthy subjects and four subjects with achromatopsia. Ex vivo preparations of five healthy donor eyes were analyzed for comparison of inner segment diameter to that measured in vivo with split-detector AOSLO. RESULTS: Nonconfocal split-detector AOSLO reveals the photoreceptor inner segment with or without the presence of a waveguiding outer segment. The diameter of inner segments measured in vivo is in good agreement with histology. A substantial number of foveal and parafoveal cone photoreceptors with apparently intact inner segments were identified in patients with the inherited disease achromatopsia. CONCLUSIONS: The application of nonconfocal split-detector to emerging human gene therapy trials will improve the potential of therapeutic success, by identifying patients with sufficient retained photoreceptor structure to benefit the most from intervention. Additionally, split-detector imaging may be useful for studies of other retinal degenerations such as AMD, retinitis pigmentosa, and choroideremia where the outer segment is lost before the remainder of the photoreceptor cell. Copyright 2014 The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Inc.
Authors: Jiangang Gao; Kyeongmi Cheon; Steven Nusinowitz; Qin Liu; Di Bei; Karen Atkins; Asif Azimi; Stephen P Daiger; Debora B Farber; John R Heckenlively; Eric A Pierce; Lori S Sullivan; Jian Zuo Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2002-04-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: R A Pearson; A C Barber; M Rizzi; C Hippert; T Xue; E L West; Y Duran; A J Smith; J Z Chuang; S A Azam; U F O Luhmann; A Benucci; C H Sung; J W Bainbridge; M Carandini; K-W Yau; J C Sowden; R R Ali Journal: Nature Date: 2012-05-03 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: R E MacLaren; R A Pearson; A MacNeil; R H Douglas; T E Salt; M Akimoto; A Swaroop; J C Sowden; R R Ali Journal: Nature Date: 2006-11-09 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Ji-jing Pang; Wen-Tao Deng; Xufeng Dai; Bo Lei; Drew Everhart; Yumiko Umino; Jie Li; Keqing Zhang; Song Mao; Sanford L Boye; Li Liu; Vince A Chiodo; Xuan Liu; Wei Shi; Ye Tao; Bo Chang; William W Hauswirth Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-11 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Robert E MacLaren; Markus Groppe; Alun R Barnard; Charles L Cottriall; Tanya Tolmachova; Len Seymour; K Reed Clark; Matthew J During; Frans P M Cremers; Graeme C M Black; Andrew J Lotery; Susan M Downes; Andrew R Webster; Miguel C Seabra Journal: Lancet Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: William S Tuten; Grace K Vergilio; Gloria J Young; Jean Bennett; Albert M Maguire; Tomas S Aleman; David H Brainard; Jessica I W Morgan Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2019-05-08
Authors: Jia Qin; Nicholas Rinella; Qinqin Zhang; Hao Zhou; Jessica Wong; Michael Deiner; Austin Roorda; Travis C Porco; Ruikang K Wang; Daniel M Schwartz; Jacque L Duncan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2018-12-03 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ethan A Rossi; Charles E Granger; Robin Sharma; Qiang Yang; Kenichi Saito; Christina Schwarz; Sarah Walters; Koji Nozato; Jie Zhang; Tomoaki Kawakami; William Fischer; Lisa R Latchney; Jennifer J Hunter; Mina M Chung; David R Williams Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-01-03 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Delu Song; Levi N Kanu; Yafeng Li; Kristen L Kelly; Rupak K Bhuyan; Tomas Aleman; Jessica I W Morgan; Joshua L Dunaief Journal: Exp Eye Res Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 3.467