Literature DB >> 28049835

Imaging individual neurons in the retinal ganglion cell layer of the living eye.

Ethan A Rossi1, Charles E Granger2,3, Robin Sharma2, Qiang Yang2, Kenichi Saito4, Christina Schwarz2, Sarah Walters2,3, Koji Nozato4, Jie Zhang2, Tomoaki Kawakami4, William Fischer5, Lisa R Latchney5, Jennifer J Hunter2,5, Mina M Chung2,5, David R Williams2,3.   

Abstract

Although imaging of the living retina with adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscopy (AOSLO) provides microscopic access to individual cells, such as photoreceptors, retinal pigment epithelial cells, and blood cells in the retinal vasculature, other important cell classes, such as retinal ganglion cells, have proven much more challenging to image. The near transparency of inner retinal cells is advantageous for vision, as light must pass through them to reach the photoreceptors, but it has prevented them from being directly imaged in vivo. Here we show that the individual somas of neurons within the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) layer can be imaged with a modification of confocal AOSLO, in both monkeys and humans. Human images of RGC layer neurons did not match the quality of monkey images for several reasons, including safety concerns that limited the light levels permissible for human imaging. We also show that the same technique applied to the photoreceptor layer can resolve ambiguity about cone survival in age-related macular degeneration. The capability to noninvasively image RGC layer neurons in the living eye may one day allow for a better understanding of diseases, such as glaucoma, and accelerate the development of therapeutic strategies that aim to protect these cells. This method may also prove useful for imaging other structures, such as neurons in the brain.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adaptive optics; imaging; photoreceptors; retina; retinal ganglion cells

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28049835      PMCID: PMC5255596          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613445114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

1.  Starburst amacrine cells of the primate retina.

Authors:  R W Rodieck
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-07-01       Impact factor: 3.215

2.  The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements.

Authors:  Ronald S Harwerth; Abhiram S Vilupuru; Nalini V Rangaswamy; Earl L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Multiply scattered light tomography and confocal imaging: detecting neovascularization in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  A Elsner; M Miura; S Burns; E Beausencourt; C Kunze; L Kelley; J Walker; G Wing; P Raskauskas; D Fletcher; Q Zhou; A Dreher
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2000-07-17       Impact factor: 3.894

4.  Supernormal vision and high-resolution retinal imaging through adaptive optics.

Authors:  J Liang; D R Williams; D T Miller
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.129

5.  Parasol and midget ganglion cells of the primate retina.

Authors:  M Watanabe; R W Rodieck
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-11-15       Impact factor: 3.215

Review 6.  Prevalence and causes of vision loss in high-income countries and in Eastern and Central Europe: 1990-2010.

Authors:  Rupert R A Bourne; Jost B Jonas; Seth R Flaxman; Jill Keeffe; Janet Leasher; Kovin Naidoo; Maurizio B Parodi; Konrad Pesudovs; Holly Price; Richard A White; Tien Y Wong; Serge Resnikoff; Hugh R Taylor
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 7.  Photoreceptor degeneration and dysfunction in aging and age-related maculopathy.

Authors:  Gregory R Jackson; Cynthia Owsley; Christine A Curcio
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 10.895

8.  Reflective afocal broadband adaptive optics scanning ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Alfredo Dubra; Yusufu Sulai
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 3.732

9.  Distinctive receptive field and physiological properties of a wide-field amacrine cell in the macaque monkey retina.

Authors:  Michael B Manookin; Christian Puller; Fred Rieke; Jay Neitz; Maureen Neitz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The use of forward scatter to improve retinal vascular imaging with an adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope.

Authors:  Toco Y P Chui; Dean A Vannasdale; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 3.732

View more
  68 in total

1.  Coextensive synchronized SLO-OCT with adaptive optics for human retinal imaging.

Authors:  Mehdi Azimipour; Ravi S Jonnal; John S Werner; Robert J Zawadzki
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 3.776

2.  Aperture phase modulation with adaptive optics: a novel approach for speckle reduction and structure extraction in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Pengfei Zhang; Suman K Manna; Eric B Miller; Yifan Jian; Ratheesh K Meleppat; Marinko V Sarunic; Edward N Pugh; Robert J Zawadzki
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Differential detection of retinal directionality.

Authors:  Salihah Qaysi; Denise Valente; Brian Vohnsen
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Comparison of confocal and non-confocal split-detection cone photoreceptor imaging.

Authors:  Nripun Sredar; Moataz Razeen; Bartlomiej Kowalski; Joseph Carroll; Alfredo Dubra
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Unsupervised identification of cone photoreceptors in non-confocal adaptive optics scanning light ophthalmoscope images.

Authors:  Christos Bergeles; Adam M Dubis; Benjamin Davidson; Melissa Kasilian; Angelos Kalitzeos; Joseph Carroll; Alfredo Dubra; Michel Michaelides; Sebastien Ourselin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 3.732

6.  Versatile multi-detector scheme for adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Sanam Mozaffari; Volker Jaedicke; Francesco LaRocca; Pavan Tiruveedhula; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Enhanced retinal vasculature imaging with a rapidly configurable aperture.

Authors:  Kaitlyn A Sapoznik; Ting Luo; Alberto de Castro; Lucie Sawides; Raymond L Warner; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 3.732

Review 8.  Adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscopy in fundus imaging, a review and update.

Authors:  Bing Zhang; Ni Li; Jie Kang; Yi He; Xiao-Ming Chen
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-11-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Ultrahigh resolution retinal imaging by visible light OCT with longitudinal achromatization.

Authors:  Shau Poh Chong; Tingwei Zhang; Aaron Kho; Marcel T Bernucci; Alfredo Dubra; Vivek J Srinivasan
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.732

10.  Development, Validation, and Innovation in Ophthalmic Laser-Based Imaging: Report From a US Food and Drug Administration-Cosponsored Forum.

Authors:  Frank Brodie; Michael Repka; Stephen Allan Burns; S Grace Prakalapakorn; Christie Morse; Joel S Schuman; Michael R Duenas; Natalie Afshari; John S Pollack; Jennifer E Thorne; Albert Vitale; H Nida Sen; David Myung; Mark S Blumenkranz; Elmer Tu; Daniel X Hammer; Michelle Tarver; Bradley Cunningham; Larry Kagemann; SriniVas Sadda; David Sarraf; Glenn J Jaffe; Malvina Eydelman
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 7.389

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.