William S Tuten1, Grace K Vergilio2, Gloria J Young2, Jean Bennett2, Albert M Maguire2, Tomas S Aleman2, David H Brainard3, Jessica I W Morgan4. 1. Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 2. Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. 4. Scheie Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center for Advanced Retinal and Ocular Therapeutics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: jwmorgan@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Recent advances in retinal imaging allow visualization of structural abnormalities in retinal disease at the cellular level. This study used adaptive optics (AO) microperimetry to assess visual sensitivity with high spatial precision and to examine how function varies across 2 phenotypic features observed in choroideremia: atrophic lesion borders and outer retinal tubulations (ORTs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve choroideremia patients. METHODS: A custom AO scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) equipped with both confocal and nonconfocal split-detection imaging methods was used to image the photoreceptor inner and outer segment mosaics. For AO microperimetry, circular 550-nm stimuli were presented through the AOSLO system; stimuli were either 9.6 or 38.3 arcmin2 (approximately 60 or 15 times smaller than a Goldman III stimulus). Test locations were identified in structural images and stimuli were targeted to these locations using real-time retinal tracking combined with measurements of transverse chromatic aberration. Psychophysical detection thresholds were measured at the atrophic border in 12 patients. Additionally, visual sensitivity was probed along ORTs in 4 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual sensitivity thresholds measured with AO microperimetry at retinal locations corresponding to structural phenotypes observed on AOSLO retinal images. RESULTS: In choroideremia, sharp borders between intact central islands of the photoreceptor mosaic and complete atrophy of the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium were observed in both split-detection and confocal structural images. Adaptive optics microperimetry at locations spanning these borders showed a commensurately sharp decrease in function, with readily measurable visual sensitivity on one side and dense scotoma on the other. These functional transitions often occurred over a distance smaller than the diameter of the Goldman III stimulus. Thresholds measured along ORTs showed dense scotoma over the tubule in all 4 participants, despite the visibility of remnant cone inner segments on the AO images. CONCLUSIONS: Choroideremia patients exhibited sharp functional transitions that collocated with structural transitions from intact to severely degenerated retina. We found no evidence of visual sensitivity over ORTs. Measuring cone function with high resolution offered insight into disease mechanisms and may enable precise assessment of whether experimental therapies, such as gene therapy, provide a functional benefit.
PURPOSE: Recent advances in retinal imaging allow visualization of structural abnormalities in retinal disease at the cellular level. This study used adaptive optics (AO) microperimetry to assess visual sensitivity with high spatial precision and to examine how function varies across 2 phenotypic features observed in choroideremia: atrophic lesion borders and outer retinal tubulations (ORTs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. PARTICIPANTS: Twelve choroideremiapatients. METHODS: A custom AO scanning light ophthalmoscope (AOSLO) equipped with both confocal and nonconfocal split-detection imaging methods was used to image the photoreceptor inner and outer segment mosaics. For AO microperimetry, circular 550-nm stimuli were presented through the AOSLO system; stimuli were either 9.6 or 38.3 arcmin2 (approximately 60 or 15 times smaller than a Goldman III stimulus). Test locations were identified in structural images and stimuli were targeted to these locations using real-time retinal tracking combined with measurements of transverse chromatic aberration. Psychophysical detection thresholds were measured at the atrophic border in 12 patients. Additionally, visual sensitivity was probed along ORTs in 4 patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Visual sensitivity thresholds measured with AO microperimetry at retinal locations corresponding to structural phenotypes observed on AOSLO retinal images. RESULTS: In choroideremia, sharp borders between intact central islands of the photoreceptor mosaic and complete atrophy of the outer retina and retinal pigment epithelium were observed in both split-detection and confocal structural images. Adaptive optics microperimetry at locations spanning these borders showed a commensurately sharp decrease in function, with readily measurable visual sensitivity on one side and dense scotoma on the other. These functional transitions often occurred over a distance smaller than the diameter of the Goldman III stimulus. Thresholds measured along ORTs showed dense scotoma over the tubule in all 4 participants, despite the visibility of remnant cone inner segments on the AO images. CONCLUSIONS:Choroideremiapatients exhibited sharp functional transitions that collocated with structural transitions from intact to severely degenerated retina. We found no evidence of visual sensitivity over ORTs. Measuring cone function with high resolution offered insight into disease mechanisms and may enable precise assessment of whether experimental therapies, such as gene therapy, provide a functional benefit.
Authors: Samuel G Jacobson; Artur V Cideciyan; Alexander Sumaroka; Tomas S Aleman; Sharon B Schwartz; Elizabeth A M Windsor; Alejandro J Roman; Edwin M Stone; Ian M MacDonald Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Walter Makous; Joseph Carroll; Jessica I Wolfing; Julianna Lin; Nathan Christie; David R Williams Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Rosa Dolz-Marco; Katie M Litts; Anna C S Tan; K Bailey Freund; Christine A Curcio Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Jasleen K Jolly; Kanmin Xue; Thomas L Edwards; Markus Groppe; Robert E MacLaren Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Liangbo L Shen; Aneesha Ahluwalia; Mengyuan Sun; Benjamin K Young; Holly K Grossetta Nardini; Lucian V Del Priore Journal: Ophthalmol Retina Date: 2020-03-14
Authors: Min Chen; Yu You Jiang; James C Gee; David H Brainard; Jessica I W Morgan Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2022-05-02 Impact factor: 3.048
Authors: Katharina G Foote; Nicholas Rinella; Janette Tang; Nicolas Bensaid; Hao Zhou; Qinqin Zhang; Ruikang K Wang; Travis C Porco; Austin Roorda; Jacque L Duncan Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2019-11-01 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Alexandra S Vitale; Lydia Sauer; Natalie K Modersitzki; Paul S Bernstein Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-09-30 Impact factor: 3.283
Authors: Nancy Aguilera; Tao Liu; Andrew J Bower; Joanne Li; Sarah Abouassali; Rongwen Lu; John Giannini; Maximilian Pfau; Chelsea Bender; Margery G Smelkinson; Amelia Naik; Bin Guan; Owen Schwartz; Andrei Volkov; Alfredo Dubra; Zhuolin Liu; Daniel X Hammer; Dragan Maric; Robert Fariss; Robert B Hufnagel; Brett G Jeffrey; Brian P Brooks; Wadih M Zein; Laryssa A Huryn; Johnny Tam Journal: Commun Biol Date: 2022-09-13
Authors: Jessica I W Morgan; Min Chen; Andrew M Huang; Yu You Jiang; Robert F Cooper Journal: Transl Vis Sci Technol Date: 2020-07-16 Impact factor: 3.283