Literature DB >> 24905169

Epigenomic comparison reveals activation of "seed" enhancers during transition from naive to primed pluripotency.

Daniel C Factor1, Olivia Corradin1, Gabriel E Zentner1, Alina Saiakhova1, Lingyun Song2, Josh G Chenoweth3, Ronald D McKay3, Gregory E Crawford2, Peter C Scacheri4, Paul J Tesar5.   

Abstract

Naive mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs) and primed epiblast stem cells (mEpiSCs) represent successive snapshots of pluripotency during embryogenesis. Using transcriptomic and epigenomic mapping we show that a small fraction of transcripts are differentially expressed between mESCs and mEpiSCs and that these genes show expected changes in chromatin at their promoters and enhancers. Unexpectedly, the cis-regulatory circuitry of genes that are expressed at identical levels between these cell states also differs dramatically. In mESCs, these genes are associated with dominant proximal enhancers and dormant distal enhancers, which we term seed enhancers. In mEpiSCs, the naive-dominant enhancers are lost, and the seed enhancers take up primary transcriptional control. Seed enhancers have increased sequence conservation and show preferential usage in downstream somatic tissues, often expanding into super enhancers. We propose that seed enhancers ensure proper enhancer utilization and transcriptional fidelity as mammalian cells transition from naive pluripotency to a somatic regulatory program.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24905169      PMCID: PMC4149284          DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.05.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Stem Cell        ISSN: 1875-9777            Impact factor:   24.633


  45 in total

Review 1.  Naive and primed pluripotent states.

Authors:  Jennifer Nichols; Austin Smith
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 24.633

2.  Combinatorial patterns of histone acetylations and methylations in the human genome.

Authors:  Zhibin Wang; Chongzhi Zang; Jeffrey A Rosenfeld; Dustin E Schones; Artem Barski; Suresh Cuddapah; Kairong Cui; Tae-Young Roh; Weiqun Peng; Michael Q Zhang; Keji Zhao
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Open chromatin defined by DNaseI and FAIRE identifies regulatory elements that shape cell-type identity.

Authors:  Lingyun Song; Zhancheng Zhang; Linda L Grasfeder; Alan P Boyle; Paul G Giresi; Bum-Kyu Lee; Nathan C Sheffield; Stefan Gräf; Mikael Huss; Damian Keefe; Zheng Liu; Darin London; Ryan M McDaniell; Yoichiro Shibata; Kimberly A Showers; Jeremy M Simon; Teresa Vales; Tianyuan Wang; Deborah Winter; Zhuzhu Zhang; Neil D Clarke; Ewan Birney; Vishwanath R Iyer; Gregory E Crawford; Jason D Lieb; Terrence S Furey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  A map of the cis-regulatory sequences in the mouse genome.

Authors:  Yin Shen; Feng Yue; David F McCleary; Zhen Ye; Lee Edsall; Samantha Kuan; Ulrich Wagner; Jesse Dixon; Leonard Lee; Victor V Lobanenkov; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression.

Authors:  Nathaniel D Heintzman; Gary C Hon; R David Hawkins; Pouya Kheradpour; Alexander Stark; Lindsey F Harp; Zhen Ye; Leonard K Lee; Rhona K Stuart; Christina W Ching; Keith A Ching; Jessica E Antosiewicz-Bourget; Hui Liu; Xinmin Zhang; Roland D Green; Victor V Lobanenkov; Ron Stewart; James A Thomson; Gregory E Crawford; Manolis Kellis; Bing Ren
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  ChIP-seq: using high-throughput sequencing to discover protein-DNA interactions.

Authors:  Dominic Schmidt; Michael D Wilson; Christiana Spyrou; Gordon D Brown; James Hadfield; Duncan T Odom
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.608

7.  Dynamic equilibrium and heterogeneity of mouse pluripotent stem cells with distinct functional and epigenetic states.

Authors:  Katsuhiko Hayashi; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes; Fuchou Tang; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2008-10-09       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Shadow enhancers as a source of evolutionary novelty.

Authors:  Joung-Woo Hong; David A Hendrix; Michael S Levine
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The transcriptional and epigenomic foundations of ground state pluripotency.

Authors:  Hendrik Marks; Tüzer Kalkan; Roberta Menafra; Sergey Denissov; Kenneth Jones; Helmut Hofemeister; Jennifer Nichols; Andrea Kranz; A Francis Stewart; Austin Smith; Hendrik G Stunnenberg
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 41.582

10.  A user's guide to the encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE).

Authors: 
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  66 in total

1.  Dynamic switching of active promoter and enhancer domains regulates Tet1 and Tet2 expression during cell state transitions between pluripotency and differentiation.

Authors:  Abhishek Sohni; Michela Bartoccetti; Rita Khoueiry; Lien Spans; Joris Vande Velde; Linde De Troyer; Kirthi Pulakanti; Frank Claessens; Sridhar Rao; Kian Peng Koh
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 4.272

Review 2.  Metabolic remodeling during the loss and acquisition of pluripotency.

Authors:  Julie Mathieu; Hannele Ruohola-Baker
Journal:  Development       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  Ground rules of the pluripotency gene regulatory network.

Authors:  Mo Li; Juan Carlos Izpisua Belmonte
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Sirtuin 1 Promotes Deacetylation of Oct4 and Maintenance of Naive Pluripotency.

Authors:  Eric O Williams; Amy K Taylor; Eric L Bell; Rachelle Lim; Daniel M Kim; Leonard Guarente
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 5.  Dynamic stem cell states: naive to primed pluripotency in rodents and humans.

Authors:  Leehee Weinberger; Muneef Ayyash; Noa Novershtern; Jacob H Hanna
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 94.444

Review 6.  Activin/Nodal signalling before implantation: setting the stage for embryo patterning.

Authors:  Costis Papanayotou; Jérôme Collignon
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 7.  Mutations in the noncoding genome.

Authors:  Cheryl A Scacheri; Peter C Scacheri
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.856

8.  Cell Type-Specific Intralocus Interactions Reveal Oligodendrocyte Mechanisms in MS.

Authors:  Daniel C Factor; Anna M Barbeau; Kevin C Allan; Lucille R Hu; Mayur Madhavan; An T Hoang; Kathryn E A Hazel; Parker A Hall; Sagar Nisraiyya; Fadi J Najm; Tyler E Miller; Zachary S Nevin; Robert T Karl; Bruna R Lima; Yanwei Song; Alexandra G Sibert; Gursimran K Dhillon; Christina Volsko; Cynthia F Bartels; Drew J Adams; Ranjan Dutta; Michael D Gallagher; William Phu; Alexey Kozlenkov; Stella Dracheva; Peter C Scacheri; Paul J Tesar; Olivia Corradin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-04-03       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Zfp281 Coordinates Opposing Functions of Tet1 and Tet2 in Pluripotent States.

Authors:  Miguel Fidalgo; Xin Huang; Diana Guallar; Carlos Sanchez-Priego; Victor Julian Valdes; Arven Saunders; Junjun Ding; Wen-Shu Wu; Carlos Clavel; Jianlong Wang
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  FOXD3 Regulates Pluripotent Stem Cell Potential by Simultaneously Initiating and Repressing Enhancer Activity.

Authors:  Raga Krishnakumar; Amy F Chen; Marisol G Pantovich; Muhammad Danial; Ronald J Parchem; Patricia A Labosky; Robert Blelloch
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 24.633

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.