PURPOSE: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.
PURPOSE: We evaluated factors influencing re-operation in tension band and plating of isolated olecranon fractures. METHODS: Four hundred eighty-nine patients with isolated olecranon fractures who underwent tension band (TB) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) from 2003 to 2013 were identified at an urban level 1 trauma centre. Medical records were reviewed for patient information and complications, including infection, nonunion, malunion, loss of function or hardware complication requiring an unplanned surgical intervention. Electronic radiographs of these patients were reviewed to identify Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA) fracture classification and patients who underwent TB or ORIF. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria of isolated olecranon fractures. TB was used for fixation in 43 patients and ORIF in 134. No statistical significance was found when comparing complication rates in open versus closed olecranon fractures. In a multivariate analysis, the key factor in outcome was method of fixation. Overall, there were higher rates of infection and hardware removal in the TB compared with the ORIF group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that the dominant factor driving re-operation in isolated olecranon fractures is type of fixation. When controlling for all variables, there is an increased chance of re-operation in patients with TB fixation.
Authors: Douglas T Hutchinson; Daniel S Horwitz; Gregory Ha; Cameron W Thomas; Kent N Bachus Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Anneluuk L C Lindenhovius; Kim M Brouwer; Job N Doornberg; David C Ring; Peter Kloen Journal: J Orthop Trauma Date: 2008 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.512
Authors: Magnus K Karlsson; Ralph Hasserius; Caroline Karlsson; Jack Besjakov; Per-Olof Josefsson Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Willem-Maarten P F Bosman; Benjamin L Emmink; Abhiram R Bhashyam; R Marijn Houwert; Jort Keizer Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2019-03-16 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: C A Perkins; M T Busch; M A Christino; J Axelrod; D P Devito; J A Fabregas; J C Flanagan; J Murphy; D Olszewski; M L Schmitz; T Schrader; S C Willimon Journal: J Child Orthop Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 1.548