Literature DB >> 24892025

Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Faruk Ayhan Basciftci1, Mehmet Akin1, Zehra Ileri1, Sinem Bayram1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term effects of self-ligating brackets (SLBs) on transverse dimensions of arches and skeletal and soft tissues and to quantitatively evaluate the treatment outcome after non-extraction treatment with SLBs.
METHODS: The sample consisted of 24 (18 female and six male) subjects, with a mean age of 14.23 ± 2.19 years, who received treatment with the Damon®3 appliances. Complete records including cephalometric radiographs and plaster models were obtained before treatment (T1), immediately after treatment (T2), six months after treatment (T3), and two years (T4) after treatment. Digital study models were generated. Twenty lateral cephalometric, six frontal cephalometric, and eight dental cast measurements were examined. The Peer Assessment Rating index was used to measure the treatment outcome. The Wilcoxon test was applied for statistical analysis of the changes.
RESULTS: There were significant increases in all transverse dental cast measurements with active treatment. There was some significant relapse in the long term, particularly in maxillary width (p < 0.05). Statistically significant increases were found in nasal (p < 0.001), maxillary base, upper molar, lower intercanine, and antigonial (p < 0.05) widths in T1-T2. Lower incisors were proclined and protruded in T1-T2.
CONCLUSIONS: SLBs correct crowding by mechanisms involving incisor proclination and protrusion and expansion of the dental arches, without induction of clinically significant changes in hard and soft tissues of the face.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bracket; Extraction vs. nonextraction; Stability

Year:  2014        PMID: 24892025      PMCID: PMC4040359          DOI: 10.4041/kjod.2014.44.3.119

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Korean J Orthod            Impact factor:   1.372


  28 in total

1.  Self-ligating brackets: where are we now?

Authors:  N W T Harradine
Journal:  J Orthod       Date:  2003-09

2.  The PAR Index (Peer Assessment Rating): methods to determine outcome of orthodontic treatment in terms of improvement and standards.

Authors:  S Richmond; W C Shaw; C T Roberts; M Andrews
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients.

Authors:  Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas; Daniel Salvatore Freitas; Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli; Marcos Roberto Freitas; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  [A comparison of rapid palatal expansion and Damon appliance on non-extraction correction of dental crowding].

Authors:  Yi-Li Yu; Guo-Hua Tang; Fang-Fang Gong; Lin-Ling Chen; Yu-Fen Qian
Journal:  Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue       Date:  2008-06

5.  Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Paul Scott; Andrew T DiBiase; Martyn Sherriff; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.650

6.  Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Authors:  Nicholas Pandis; Argy Polychronopoulou; Margarita Makou; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Comparative assessment of conventional and self-ligating appliances on the effect of mandibular intermolar distance in adolescent nonextraction patients: a single-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Nikolaos Pandis; Argy Polychronopoulou; Christos Katsaros; Theodore Eliades
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Resolution of mandibular arch crowding in growing patients with Class I malocclusions treated nonextraction.

Authors:  M Weinberg; C Sadowsky
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Comparison of the outcomes of the lower incisor extraction, premolar extraction and non-extraction treatments.

Authors:  Zehra Ileri; Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Siddik Malkoc; Sabri Ilhan Ramoglu
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2011-07-10       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Extraction of maxillary first permanent molars in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.

Authors:  Mattijs J P Stalpers; Johan W Booij; Ewald M Bronkhorst; Anne Marie Kuijpers-Jagtman; Christos Katsaros
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  5 in total

1.  Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system.

Authors:  Megan B Lineberger; Lorenzo Franchi; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni; James A McNamara
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Maxillary expansion in an animal model with light, continuous force.

Authors:  Achint Utreja; Carol Bain; Brett Turek; Robert Holland; Rawan AlRasheed; Parand Sorkhdini; W Eugene Roberts
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Soft tissue facial profile changes after orthodontic treatment with or without tooth extractions in Class I malocclusion patients: A comparative study.

Authors:  Benedito V Freitas; Vandilson P Rodrigues; Mariana F Rodrigues; Heloiza V F de Melo; Pedro C F Dos Santos
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2018-07-10

4.  Stability comparison of two different dentoalveolar expansion treatment protocols.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Tülin Taner
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct

5.  Quantitative measures of gingival recession and the influence of gender, race, and attrition.

Authors:  Chester S Handelman; Anthony P Eltink; Ellen BeGole
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.