Literature DB >> 19959610

Mandibular dental arch changes associated with treatment of crowding using self-ligating and conventional brackets.

Nicholas Pandis1, Argy Polychronopoulou, Margarita Makou, Theodore Eliades.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of treatment of mandibular crowding with self-ligating and conventional brackets on dental arch variables. Fifty-six patients were selected from a pool of subjects satisfying the following inclusion criteria: non-extraction treatment in the mandibular or maxillary arches, eruption of all mandibular teeth, no spaces and an irregularity index greater than 2 mm in the mandibular arch, and no adjunct treatment such as etxra- or intraoral appliances. The patients were assigned to two groups: one group received treatment with the self-ligating bracket and the other with a conventional edgewise appliance, both with a 0.022 inch slot. Lateral cephalometric radiographs obtained at the beginning (T1) and end (T2) of treatment were used to assess the alteration in mandibular incisor inclination, and measurements of intercanine and intermolar widths were made on dental casts to investigate changes associated with the correction. The results were analysed with bivariate and multivariate linear regression analysis in order to examine the effect of the bracket systems on arch width or lower incisor inclination, adjusting for the confounding effect of demographic and clinical characteristics. An alignment-induced increase in the proclination of the mandibular incisors was observed for both groups; no difference was identified between self-ligating and conventional brackets with respect to this parameter. Likewise, an increase in intercanine and intermolar widths was noted for both bracket groups; the self-ligating group showed a higher intermolar width increase than the conventional group, whereas the amount of crowding and Angle classification were not significant predictors of post-treatment intermolar width.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19959610     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjp123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  19 in total

1.  Three-dimensional digital cast analysis of the effects produced by a passive self-ligating system.

Authors:  Megan B Lineberger; Lorenzo Franchi; Lucia H S Cevidanes; Luis T Huanca Ghislanzoni; James A McNamara
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Cristina Futagami; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

3.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 4.  Differences between active and passive self-ligating brackets for orthodontic treatment : Systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Yiruo He; Tian Chen; Mengyuan Zhao; Yinqiu Yan; Hongzhe Wang; Ding Bai
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Agreement of the clinician's choice of archwire selection on conventional and virtual models.

Authors:  Sahar Haddadpour; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Mohammad Behnaz; Sohrab Asefi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban; Amir Hossein Abdi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Evaluation of maxillary buccal alveolar bone before and after orthodontic alignment without extractions: A cone beam computed tomographic study.

Authors:  Juliana F Morais; Birte Melsen; Karina M S de Freitas; Nuria Castello Branco; Daniela G Garib; Paolo M Cattaneo
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 9.  Self-ligating brackets in orthodontics. A systematic review.

Authors:  Padhraig S Fleming; Ama Johal
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  An assessment of conventional and self-ligating brackets in Class I maxillary constriction patients.

Authors:  Ezgi Atik; Semra Ciğer
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 2.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.