Literature DB >> 14530427

Self-ligating brackets: where are we now?

N W T Harradine1.   

Abstract

The current situation regarding self-ligating brackets is reviewed. Recent developments, clinical advantages, and remaining imperfections are described. The question of active versus passive ligation is scrutinized. The evidence regarding treatment efficiency is reviewed. Suggested clinical tips and changes of treatment mechanics are summarized and illustrated. Self-ligating brackets have reached a stage of design and production control, where the advantages are significantly greater than the remaining imperfections.

Mesh：

Year:  2003        PMID： 14530427     DOI： 10.1093/ortho/30.3.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthod        ISSN： 1465-3125


  34 in total

1.  Self-ligating versus Invisalign: analysis of dento-alveolar effects.

Authors:  Chiara Pavoni; Roberta Lione; Giuseppina Laganà; Paola Cozza
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2011-07-18

2.  Frictional resistance of self-ligating versus conventional brackets in different bracket-archwire-angle combinations.

Authors:  Maria Regina Guerra Monteiro; Licinio Esmeraldo da Silva; Carlos Nelson Elias; Oswaldo de Vasconcellos Vilella
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Friction in a hybrid system. An in vitro study.

Authors:  M Rozzi; M Mucedero; L Franchi; P Cozza
Journal:  Oral Implantol (Rome)       Date:  2011-01-23

4.  Friction behavior of self-ligating and conventional brackets with different ligature systems.

Authors:  Alexandra Szczupakowski; Susanne Reimann; Cornelius Dirk; Ludger Keilig; Anna Weber; Andreas Jäger; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 1.938

5.  Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.

Authors:  Sue Holtmann; Anna Konermann; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Mona Montasser; Tarek El-Bialy; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

6.  Effect of archwire qualities and bracket designs on the force systems during leveling of malaligned teeth.

Authors:  W Perrey; A Konermann; L Keilig; S Reimann; A Jäger; C Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.938

Review 7.  Systematic review on self-ligating vs. conventional brackets: initial pain, number of visits, treatment time.

Authors:  Ales Čelar; Magdalena Schedlberger; Petra Dörfler; Michael Bertl
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  From conventional to self-ligating bracket systems: is it possible to aggregate the experience with the former to the use of the latter?

Authors:  Anderson Capistrano; Aldir Cordeiro; Danilo Furquim Siqueira; Leopoldino Capelozza Filho; Mauricio de Almeida Cardoso; Renata Rodrigues de Almeida-Pedrin
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2014 May-Jun

9.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

10.  Self-ligating vs conventional brackets as perceived by orthodontists.

Authors:  Chase Prettyman; Al M Best; Steven J Lindauer; Eser Tufekci
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 2.079
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.