Literature DB >> 18251612

PAR evaluation of treated Class I extraction patients.

Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas1, Daniel Salvatore Freitas, Fabrício Pinelli Valarelli, Marcos Roberto Freitas, Guilherme Janson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate treatment changes and quality of finishing occlusion in Class I patients treated with four premolar extractions.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Dental casts of 94 subjects (50 males and 44 females) were evaluated. Mean pretreatment age was 13.46 years, and mean treatment time was 2.09 years. The peer assessment rating (PAR) index was obtained from pretreatment and posttreatment dental casts.
RESULTS: The mean pretreatment PAR index of 29.46 was reduced to 6.32 at posttreatment stage, achieving a reduction of 78.54% with treatment. There was correlation between the initial PAR and correction during treatment, that is, the more severe the malocclusion the greater the treatment changes.
CONCLUSION: The cases evaluated showed a high-standard orthodontic finishing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18251612     DOI: 10.2319/042307-206.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  8 in total

1.  Long-term stability of dentoalveolar, skeletal, and soft tissue changes after non-extraction treatment with a self-ligating system.

Authors:  Faruk Ayhan Basciftci; Mehmet Akin; Zehra Ileri; Sinem Bayram
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 1.372

2.  Pretreatment dentoskeletal comparison between individuals treated with extractions in the 1970s and in the new millennium.

Authors:  Rodrigo Naveda; Guilherme Janson; Gabriela Manami Natsumeda; Marcos Roberto de Freitas; Leopoldino Capelozza-Filho; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Treatment Time of Class II Malocclusion, with and without Mandibular Crowding, Treated with Four Premolar Extractions: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Guilherme Janson; Lucas Nunes Bastos Curty Silva; Marcelo Vinicius Valerio; Vinicius Laranjeira; Ana Niederberger; Daniela Garib
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-06

4.  Implementation of post treatment critical evaluation improved the quality of orthodontic care in postgraduate orthodontic clinic: A 10 years comparative study.

Authors:  Rashmi Verma; Ashok Kumar Utreja; Satinder Pal Singh; Ashok Kumar Jena
Journal:  Indian J Dent       Date:  2015 Jul-Sep

5.  Evaluation of treatment outcomes in a 3 years post-graduate orthodontic program using the peer assessment rating (par).

Authors:  Paloma González-Gil-de-Bernabé; Carlos Bellot-Arcís; José M Montiel-Company; José L Gandía-Franco
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2014-10-01

6.  Assessment of orthodontic treatment outcome using Peer Assessment Rating (PAR) index among patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  Komil Tintodana; Sanjeev Verma; Satinder P Singh; Vinay Kumar; Raj K Verma; Nameksh R Bhupali
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02

7.  Cephalometric and occlusal changes of Class III malocclusion treated with or without extractions.

Authors:  Roberto Bombonatti; Arón Aliaga-Del Castillo; Juliana Fraga Soares Bombonatti; Daniela Garib; Bryan Tompson; Guilherme Janson
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2020 Jul-Aug

8.  Quality of orthodontic care-A multicenter cohort study in Germany : Part 1: Evaluation of effectiveness of orthodontic treatments and predictive factors.

Authors:  I Graf; N C Bock; T Bartzela; V Röper; U Schumann; K Reck; H Christ; K Höfer; U Fritz; D Wiechmann; P-G Jost-Brinkmann; M Wolf; S Ruf; B Braumann
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 2.341

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.