Literature DB >> 18929262

Alignment efficiency of Damon3 self-ligating and conventional orthodontic bracket systems: a randomized clinical trial.

Paul Scott1, Andrew T DiBiase, Martyn Sherriff, Martyn T Cobourne.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of mandibular tooth alignment and the clinical effectiveness of a self-ligating and a conventional preadjusted edgewise orthodontic bracket system.
METHODS: A multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 2 orthodontic clinics. Sixty-two subjects (32 male, 30 female; mean age, 16.27 years) with mandibular incisor irregularities of 5 to 12 mm and a prescribed extraction pattern including the mandibular first premolars were randomly allocated to treatment with Damon3 self-ligating (Ormco, Glendora, Calif) or Synthesis (Ormco) conventionally ligated brackets. Fully ligated 0.014-in nickel-titanium archwires were used first in both groups, followed by a sequence of 0.014 x 0.025-in and 0.018 x 0.025-in nickel-titanium, and 0.019 x 0.025-in stainless steel. Study casts were taken at the start of treatment (T1), the first archwire change (T2), and the placement of the final 0.019 x 0.025-in archwire (T3). Cephalometric lateral skull and long-cone periapical radiographs of the mandibular incisors were taken at T1 and T3.
RESULTS: No significant difference was noted (P >0.05) in initial rate of alignment for either bracket system. Initial irregularity influenced subsequent rate of movement, but sex, age, and appliance type were statistically insignificant. Alignment was associated with an increase in intercanine width, a reduction in arch length, and proclination of the mandibular incisors for both appliances, but the differences were not significant. Incisor root resorption was not clinically significant and did not differ between systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Damon3 self-ligating brackets are no more efficient than conventional ligated preadjusted brackets during tooth alignment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18929262     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.04.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  43 in total

1.  Incisal Apical Root Resorption Evaluation after Low-Friction Orthodontic Treatment Using Two-Dimensional Radiographic Imaging and Trigonometric Correction.

Authors:  Fabio Savoldi; Stefano Bonetti; Domenico Dalessandri; Gualtiero Mandelli; Corrado Paganelli
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-11-01

2.  Root resorption due to orthodontic treatment using self-ligating and conventional brackets : A cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Isil Aras; Idil Unal; Gencer Huniler; Aynur Aras
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Dentoalveolar mandibular changes with self-ligating versus conventional bracket systems: A CBCT and dental cast study.

Authors:  Marcio Rodrigues de Almeida; Cristina Futagami; Ana Cláudia de Castro Ferreira Conti; Paula Vanessa Pedron Oltramari-Navarro; Ricardo de Lima Navarro
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2015 May-Jun

4.  Tooth movement rate and anchorage lost during canine retraction: A maxillary and mandibular comparison.

Authors:  Andre da C Monini; Luiz G Gandini; Alexandre P Vianna; Renato P Martins; Helder B Jacob
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.079

Review 5.  Root Resorption in Orthodontics.

Authors:  Furkan Dindaroğlu; Servet Doğan
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  A comparison of lower canine retraction and loss of anchorage between conventional and self-ligating brackets: a single-center randomized split-mouth controlled trial.

Authors:  André da Costa Monini; Luiz Gonzaga Gandini Júnior; Alexandre Protásio Vianna; Renato Parsekian Martins
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Different bracket-archwire combinations for simulated correction of two-dimensional tooth malalignment: Leveling outcomes and initial force systems.

Authors:  Sue Holtmann; Anna Konermann; Ludger Keilig; Susanne Reimann; Andreas Jäger; Mona Montasser; Tarek El-Bialy; Christoph Bourauel
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 1.938

8.  Characterizing constraining forces in the alignment phase of orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Christopher G Gibson; Feng-Chang Lin; Ceib Phillips; Alex Edelman; Ching-Chang Ko
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Tooth and bone changes after initial anterior dental alignment using preformed vs customized nickel titanium archwires in adults: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Papatpong Phermsang-Ngarm; Chairat Charoemratrote
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Transversal changes, space closure, and efficiency of conventional and self-ligating appliances : A quantitative systematic review.

Authors:  Xianrui Yang; Chaoran Xue; Yiruo He; Mengyuan Zhao; Mengqi Luo; Peiqi Wang; Ding Bai
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2017-11-03       Impact factor: 1.938

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.