Literature DB >> 24890714

Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Tom Francart1, Anneke Lenssen, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

Interaural timing cues are important for sound source localization and for binaural unmasking of speech that is spatially separated from interfering sounds. Users of a cochlear implant (CI) with residual hearing in the non-implanted ear (bimodal listeners) can only make very limited use of interaural timing cues with their clinical devices. Previous studies showed that bimodal listeners can be sensitive to interaural time differences (ITDs) for simple single- and three-channel stimuli. The modulation enhancement strategy (MEnS) was developed to improve the ITD perception of bimodal listeners. It enhances temporal modulations on all stimulated electrodes, synchronously with modulations in the acoustic signal presented to the non-implanted ear, based on measurement of the amplitude peaks occurring at the rate of the fundamental frequency in voiced phonemes. In the first experiment, ITD detection thresholds were measured using the method of constant stimuli for five bimodal listeners for an artificial vowel, processed with either the advanced combination encoder (ACE) strategy or with MEnS. With MEnS, detection thresholds were significantly lower, and for four subjects well within the physically relevant range. In the second experiment, the extent of lateralization was measured in three subjects with both strategies, and ITD sensitivity was determined using an adaptive procedure. All subjects could lateralize sounds based on ITD and sensitivity was significantly better with MEnS than with ACE. The current results indicate that ITD cues can be provided to bimodal listeners with modified sound processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24890714      PMCID: PMC4141431          DOI: 10.1007/s10162-014-0457-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  41 in total

1.  Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system.

Authors:  A E Vandali; L A Whitford; K L Plant; G M Clark
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  The psychometric function: II. Bootstrap-based confidence intervals and sampling.

Authors:  F A Wichmann; N J Hill
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2001-11

3.  Studies on bilateral cochlear implants at the University of Wisconsin's Binaural Hearing and Speech Laboratory.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Matthew J Goupell; Shelly Godar; Tina Grieco-Calub; Gary L Jones; Soha N Garadat; Smita Agrawal; Alan Kan; Ann Todd; Christi Hess; Sara Misurelli
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Binaural sensitivity as a function of interaural electrode position with a bilateral cochlear implant user.

Authors:  Christopher J Long; Donald K Eddington; H Steven Colburn; William M Rabinowitz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Speech perception, localization, and lateralization with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Richard J M van Hoesel; Richard S Tyler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Threshold differences for interaural time delays carried by double vowels.

Authors:  Michael A Akeroyd
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of Mandarin Chinese with cochlear implants using enhanced temporal pitch cues.

Authors:  Matthias Milczynski; Janice Erica Chang; Jan Wouters; Astrid van Wieringen
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Enhancing sensitivity to interaural delays at high frequencies by using "transposed stimuli".

Authors:  Leslie R Bernstein; Constantine Trahiotis
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Development of a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and acoustic stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh J McDermott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-09-18       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Speech perception and localisation with SCORE bimodal: a loudness normalisation strategy for combined cochlear implant and hearing aid stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Hugh McDermott
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interaural Time Difference Perception with a Cochlear Implant and a Normal Ear.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Konstantin Wiebe; Thomas Wesarg
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2018-09-27

2.  Bimodal Cochlear Implant Listeners' Ability to Perceive Minimal Audible Angle Differences.

Authors:  Ashley Zaleski-King; Matthew J Goupell; Dragana Barac-Cikoja; Matthew Bakke
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 1.664

3.  Improving Interaural Time Difference Sensitivity Using Short Inter-pulse Intervals with Amplitude-Modulated Pulse Trains in Bilateral Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Sridhar Srinivasan; Bernhard Laback; Piotr Majdak; Christoph Arnoldner
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2020-02-10

4.  High-resolution temporal weighting of interaural time differences in speech.

Authors:  Lucas S Baltzell; Virginia Best
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 2.482

5.  Activity in Human Auditory Cortex Represents Spatial Separation Between Concurrent Sounds.

Authors:  Martha M Shiell; Lars Hausfeld; Elia Formisano
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Kenneth K Jensen; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Jack H Noble; Michael Hoa; H Jeffery Kim; Robert Shih; Elizabeth Kolberg; Miranda Cleary; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-01       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  Interaural Time-Difference Discrimination as a Measure of Place of Stimulation for Cochlear-Implant Users With Single-Sided Deafness.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Gerald I Schuchman; Kenneth K Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

8.  Reweighting of Binaural Localization Cues in Bilateral Cochlear-Implant Listeners.

Authors:  Maike Klingel; Bernhard Laback
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-11-23

9.  A method to enhance the use of interaural time differences for cochlear implants in reverberant environments.

Authors:  Jessica J M Monaghan; Bernhard U Seeber
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.