Literature DB >> 29712782

Activity in Human Auditory Cortex Represents Spatial Separation Between Concurrent Sounds.

Martha M Shiell1, Lars Hausfeld2, Elia Formisano2.   

Abstract

The primary and posterior auditory cortex (AC) are known for their sensitivity to spatial information, but how this information is processed is not yet understood. AC that is sensitive to spatial manipulations is also modulated by the number of auditory streams present in a scene (Smith et al., 2010), suggesting that spatial and nonspatial cues are integrated for stream segregation. We reasoned that, if this is the case, then it is the distance between sounds rather than their absolute positions that is essential. To test this hypothesis, we measured human brain activity in response to spatially separated concurrent sounds with fMRI at 7 tesla in five men and five women. Stimuli were spatialized amplitude-modulated broadband noises recorded for each participant via in-ear microphones before scanning. Using a linear support vector machine classifier, we investigated whether sound location and/or location plus spatial separation between sounds could be decoded from the activity in Heschl's gyrus and the planum temporale. The classifier was successful only when comparing patterns associated with the conditions that had the largest difference in perceptual spatial separation. Our pattern of results suggests that the representation of spatial separation is not merely the combination of single locations, but rather is an independent feature of the auditory scene.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Often, when we think of auditory spatial information, we think of where sounds are coming from-that is, the process of localization. However, this information can also be used in scene analysis, the process of grouping and segregating features of a soundwave into objects. Essentially, when sounds are further apart, they are more likely to be segregated into separate streams. Here, we provide evidence that activity in the human auditory cortex represents the spatial separation between sounds rather than their absolute locations, indicating that scene analysis and localization processes may be independent.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/384977-08$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  auditory cortex; auditory scene analysis; fMRI; multivariate pattern analysis; spatial cognition

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29712782      PMCID: PMC6596126          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3323-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  30 in total

1.  Spatial sensitivity in field PAF of cat auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Brian J Mickey; Ewan A Macpherson; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Effects of stimulus azimuth and intensity on the single-neuron activity in the auditory cortex of the alert macaque monkey.

Authors:  Timothy M Woods; Steve E Lopez; James H Long; Joanne E Rahman; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Populations of auditory cortical neurons can accurately encode acoustic space across stimulus intensity.

Authors:  Lee M Miller; Gregg H Recanzone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-25       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Spatial localization after excision of human auditory cortex.

Authors:  R J Zatorre; V B Penhune
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  "Who" is saying "what"? Brain-based decoding of human voice and speech.

Authors:  Elia Formisano; Federico De Martino; Milene Bonte; Rainer Goebel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Modulation enhancement in the electrical signal improves perception of interaural time differences with bimodal stimulation.

Authors:  Tom Francart; Anneke Lenssen; Jan Wouters
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-06-03

7.  Decoding sound source location and separation using neural population activity patterns.

Authors:  Mitchell L Day; Bertrand Delgutte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Location coding by opponent neural populations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  G Christopher Stecker; Ian A Harrington; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Neural representation of three-dimensional acoustic space in the human temporal lobe.

Authors:  Xiaolu Zhang; Qingtian Zhang; Xiaolin Hu; Bo Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment.

Authors:  Frederick J Gallun; Anna C Diedesch; Sean D Kampel; Kasey M Jakien
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-23       Impact factor: 4.677

View more
  2 in total

1.  [Evolution of auditory response signal-to-noise ratio in ascending auditory pathways].

Authors:  J Wang; C Song; F Liang
Journal:  Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao       Date:  2021-11-20

Review 2.  Recent advances in understanding the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Andrew J King; Sundeep Teki; Ben D B Willmore
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-09-26
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.