Self-assembly of amyloid fibrils is the molecular mechanism best known for its connection with debilitating human disorders such as Alzheimer's disease but is also associated with various functional cellular responses. There is increasing evidence that amyloid formation proceeds along two distinct assembly pathways involving either globular oligomers and protofibrils or rigid monomeric filaments. Oligomers, in particular, have been implicated as the dominant molecular species responsible for pathogenesis. Yet the molecular mechanisms regulating their self-assembly have remained elusive. Here we show that oligomers/protofibrils and monomeric filaments, formed along distinct assembly pathways, display critical differences in their ability to template amyloid growth at physiological vs denaturing temperatures. At physiological temperatures, amyloid filaments remained stable but could not seed growth of native monomers. In contrast, oligomers and protofibrils not only remained intact but were capable of self-replication using native monomers as the substrate. Kinetic data further suggested that this prion-like growth mode of oligomers/protofibrils involved two distinct activities operating orthogonal from each other: autocatalytic self-replication of oligomers from native monomers and nucleated polymerization of oligomers into protofibrils. The environmental changes to stability and templating competence of these different amyloid species in different environments are likely to be important for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying both pathogenic and functional amyloid self-assembly.
Self-assembly of amyloid fibrils is the molecular mechanism best known for its connection with debilitating human disorders such as Alzheimer's disease but is also associated with various functional cellular responses. There is increasing evidence that amyloid formation proceeds along two distinct assembly pathways involving either globular oligomers and protofibrils or rigid monomeric filaments. Oligomers, in particular, have been implicated as the dominant molecular species responsible for pathogenesis. Yet the molecular mechanisms regulating their self-assembly have remained elusive. Here we show that oligomers/protofibrils and monomeric filaments, formed along distinct assembly pathways, display critical differences in their ability to template amyloid growth at physiological vs denaturing temperatures. At physiological temperatures, amyloid filaments remained stable but could not seed growth of native monomers. In contrast, oligomers and protofibrils not only remained intact but were capable of self-replication using native monomers as the substrate. Kinetic data further suggested that this prion-like growth mode of oligomers/protofibrils involved two distinct activities operating orthogonal from each other: autocatalytic self-replication of oligomers from native monomers and nucleated polymerization of oligomers into protofibrils. The environmental changes to stability and templating competence of these different amyloid species in different environments are likely to be important for understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying both pathogenic and functional amyloid self-assembly.
Self-assembly of proteins
into long fibrillar aggregates with similar
cross-β sheet structures is the molecular signature of amyloid
diseases, including Alzheimer’s disease, tauopathies, prion
diseases, type II diabetes, and rheumatoid arthritis.[1] While the molecular mechanisms underlying amyloid pathogenesis
remain intensely debated, the toxicity of globular oligomeric intermediates
of the fibril assembly process is a prominent suspect.[2−7] Yet, amyloid oligomers are considered short-lived intermediates
emerging during amyloid assembly that require extrinsic stabilization
for studying their properties.[8] Furthermore,
these oligomeric intermediates might be off-pathway from mature fibril
formation and metastable against seeding with mature fibrils.[9,10] This raises the question how short-lived, off-pathway intermediates
of the assembly process can initiate the various pathologies associated
with amyloid diseases and promote their spread throughout tissues.
However, our understanding of the properties of amyloid intermediates
and their ability to promote amyloid formation of monomers are typically
derived from in vitro fibril growth assays often
confined to a narrow range of partially denaturing solution conditions.
Comparatively little is known about the behavior of distinct amyloid
species close to physiological solution conditions, in particular
whether they remain stable instead of dissolving or precipitating
and whether they are capable of seeding growth from native monomers.[11,12] Multiple experimental observations[9,10,13] and theoretical considerations[14−16] have suggested
that changes in solution environment (pH, temperature, ionic composition,
and protein concentration) could alter basic properties of amyloid
aggregates, including their assembly mechanisms, their aggregation
propensities, and their interactions with monomers. Investigating
the aggregation propensity of different amyloid templates with native
monomers also addresses recent suggestions that amyloid oligomers
might assume prion-like characteristics that contribute to their spread
in neurodegenerative diseases.[17] We set
out to investigate whether amyloid oligomers, protofibrils, and mature
fibrils remained intact at physiological temperatures, and whether
any of them could induce amyloid formation from lysozyme in its native
fold. For these experiments we used hen egg-white lysozyme and its
well-defined oligomeric and fibrillar assembly pathways as our model
system.[10]Hen egg-white lysozyme
(hew-L) is a small enzyme of 14.3 kDa molecular
weight with well-defined biochemical and physical properties. Point
mutations in humanlysozyme underlie non-neuropathic systemic forms
of humanamyloidosis, with dangerous disruptions to kidney and liver
function.[18] Hew-L undergoes a well-defined
cooperative unfolding transition as a function of temperature, thereby
permitting us to determine how different amyloid species interact
with natively folded vs partially unfolded monomers. Thermal denaturation
also induces spontaneous amyloid formation of lysozyme in
vitro.(19,20) Fibril formation of lysozyme
switches sharply from generating rigid filaments at low ionic strength
to producing compact oligomeric intermediates at higher ionic strength,
which subsequently nucleate curvilinear protofibrils.[21] The existence of an oligomeric vs fibrillar assembly pathways
has been reported for multiple amyloid proteins including amyloid-β,
beta-2 microglobulin, and polyglutamine.[9,22−25] For some of these systems, the oligomers and/or protofibrils are
“on pathway” to mature fibril formation,[24,26] while the globular oligomer and protofibrils of lysozyme and beta-2
microglobulin remain off-pathway. Furthermore, lysozyme oligomers,
protofibrils, and rigid filaments all develop β-sheet peaks
in their IR spectra that are considered diagnostic of amyloid structures.[27] Differences in their IR peak wavenumber and
morphology imply that lysozyme oligomers and protofibrils are amyloidolytic
structures that are distinct from their rigid filament counterparts.[28]The investigation into potential prion-like
activity of lysozyme
aggregates was motivated by observations that oligomer or protofibril
growth at partially denaturing temperatures appeared to continue,
albeit at a very slow pace, long after solutions had been returned
to room temperature. We therefore tested whether oligomers, protofibrils,
and mature fibrils remained intact and soluble upon return to physiological
temperatures and pH, and whether they developed prion-like characteristics
of self-replication from native substrate under these conditions.
While we intended to confine these experiments to the physiological
pH of 7, we found that thermal denaturation of hew-L at pH 7 readily
produced oligomers and protofibrils but no filaments. Including pH
3 in the experiments allowed us to generate all three aggregate species
by simply changing the NaCl concentration.[10,28] Equally important, pH 3 preserves the native fold at 37 °C
and the cooperative unfolding of lysozyme’s secondary and tertiary
structure near 70 °C. At more acidic pH values, this cooperativity
breaks down leading to partial loss of tertiary structure prior to
secondary structure unfolding.[29] In addition,
pH 3 and 37 °C avoids the noticeable monomer hydrolysis at more
acidic pH values.[30] We also performed cross-seeding
experiments by transferring filaments and oligomers/protofibrils generated
at pH 3 as seeds into fresh monomer solutions at pH 7. To assess aggregate
stability, aggregation kinetics, and aggregate structures during seeding
experiments, we relied on a broad range of complementary experimental
techniques including ThT fluorescence, static and dynamic light scattering
(SLS, DLS), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and attenuated total reflectance
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR).
Experimental Methods
Details for methods summarized
here have been published previously.[10,21,28]
Protein and Chemicals
Two times
recrystallized, dialyzed,
and lyophilized hen egg white lysozyme (hew-L) was purchased from
Worthington Biochemicals (Lakewood NJ) and used for all experiments.
Ultrapure grade thioflavin T was obtained from Anaspec (Freemont,
CA). All other chemicals were purchased from Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh,
PA) and were reagent grade or better.
Preparation and Isolation
of Amyloid Seeds
Typically
hew-L was dissolved in 20 mM HEPES at pH 7 or 10 mM of sodium citrate
at pH 3 and filtered consecutively through 220 and 50 nm syringe filters.[31] Lysozyme concentrations were determined from
UV absorption using a280 = 2.64 mL mg–1 cm–1. For oligomer/protofibril
formation at pH 7, solutions were incubated with either 40 or 80 mM
NaCl at 70 °C for 1.5–6 h. At pH 3, oligomer/protofibril
formation was induced by incubation lysozyme with 250 mM NaCl at 70
°C for 4–10 h. For amyloid filament growth, solutions
were incubated at pH 3 with 75–100 mM NaCL for 20–30
h. Seeds were separated from lysozyme monomers using 50 kDa MW centricon
filters, spun at 1400 g, and rinsed multiple times
with the appropriate growth buffer. 100–150 μL of isolated
seeds in buffer were collected from the top reservoir of the filter,
and the seed concentration was determined from UV absorption.
Aggregate
Stability and Seeded Growth Experiments
For
seed growth experiments, native lysozyme solutions were mixed with
5–20% (v/v) of amyloid seed solutions and incubated for 5–14
days. For seed stability experiments, oligomers/protofibrils were
added at 10–20% (v/v) to buffer and incubated up to 50 h, and
up to 100 h for filaments. For experiment on monomeric dependence
of seeded oligomer/protofibril growth, 10% of isolated seeds were
incubated with 0.2–20 mg/mL of monomeric lysozyme solution
at 37 °C and pH 7. For cross-seeding experiments, protofibrils
and filaments generated at pH 3 were separated from monomers and brought
to pH 3 via dialysis against pH 7 buffer. Protofibrils at various
stages of growth irreversibly precipitated upon buffer exchange. Amyloid
filaments also tended to precipitate but, after passing through 0.8
μm syringe filters, resolubilized. These fibrils were concentrated
to 20 mg/mL right before seeding with fresh monomers at pH 7.
Static
and Dynamic Light Scattering
Static and dynamic
light scattering (SLS and DLS) measurements were performed using a
Zetasizer Nano S (Malvern Instruments, Worchestershire, UK). For in situ measurements, autocorrelation functions of scattered
light were collected using acquisition times of 3 min and converted
into particle-size distributions using the “narrow modes”
or “general purpose” algorithms provided with the Zetasizer
Nano S. Changes in scattering intensity were derived from the count
rates of the avalanche photodiode photon detector.
Atomic Force
Microscopy
Amyloid aggregates were imaged
by depositing samples on freshly cleaved mica and drying them with
nitrogen. Images were acquired with an MFP-3D atomic-force microscope
(Asylum Research, Santa Barbara, CA) using NSC36/NoAl (Mikromasch,
San Jose, CA) silicon tips with nominal tip radii of 10 nm. The cantilever
was driven at 60–70 kHz in alternating current mode. Images
at 512 × 512 pixel resolution were acquired at a scan rate of
0.5 Hz.
Thioflavin T Fluorescence Spectroscopy
ThT fluorescence
measurements were performed on a FluoroMax-4 spectrofluorometer (Horiba
Jobin Yvon, Edison, NJ) using excitation and emission wavelengths
of 445 and 485 nm, respectively. For ThT measurements, small aliquots
of the hew-L solutions were removed and mixed 100:1 with a ThT stock
solution, resulting in a final ThT concentration of 10 μM.
Fourier-Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy of Lysozyme Solutions
Attenuated total reflectance Fourier-Transform infrared spectroscopy
(ATR- FTIR) was performed on a Bruker Optik Vertex 70 (Ettlingen,
Germany) spectrometer with a mid-infrared source and a pyroelectric
DLATGS (deuterated l-alanine dopedtriglycene sulfate) room
temperature detector. 30 μL of protein solution were placed
on the thermostated silicon crystal of a BioATRcell II (Harrick Scientific
Products, Inc.; Pleasantville, New York) attenuated total reflectance
(ATR) accessory. FTIR spectra were acquired between 1000 and 4000
cm–1 wavenumbers. In general, 400–800 scans
at 1 cm–1 step size were recorded and 10 such runs
were averaged prior to data processing.
Results
Stability of
Amyloid Oligomers, Protofibrils and Filaments at
Physiological Temperatures
First, we determined how lowering
the solution temperature from above the onset for monomer denaturation
(70 °C) to physiological values (37 °C) affected the stability
of the various amyloid species generated at either pH 3 or pH 7. Persistent
solubility and lack of dissociation of aggregates near physiological
temperatures is a prerequisite for their ability to propagate within
tissues and seed new amyloid formation there. We used transient thermal
denaturation, required to induce amyloid formation,[11,12] and brought these preformed amyloid aggregates back to physiological
temperature. Filaments or oligomers and protofibrils at pH 3 were
formed by incubating 1.4 mM lysozyme at 70 °C with either 100
mM or 250 mM NaCl, respectively. At pH 7 only amyloid oligomer and
protofibril growth was observed. Oligomers at pH 7 were generated
by incubating 1.4 mM lysozyme with 40 mM NaCl at 70 °C for 1.5
h or less. After 2 h protofibril nucleation was detected by DLS, with
the proportion of protofibrils in solution increasing with incubation
period. In all cases amyloid growth was monitored in situ using static and dynamic light scattering (DLS). AFM images of amyloid
aggregates generated at either pH 3 or pH 7 showed the characteristic
morphologies associated with either amyloid filaments (Figure 1a) or oligomers and protofibrils (Figures 1b and 6a).[10] They displayed the same kinetic, tinctorial, and structural
features as those previously described at pH 2 and 7.[21,28]
Figure 1
Stability of amyloid aggregates at physiological temperature
and two pH values. AFM images of (a) lysozyme filaments and
(b) protofibrils formed during incubation at 70 °C and pH 3 in
100 or 250 mM NaCl, respectively. Scale bar: 200 nm; color scale:
aggregate height in nm. Images of oligomers/protofibrils at pH 7 are
provided in Figure 6a. Static light scattering
(Iscat) indicates that at 37 °C (c)
filaments formed at pH 3 remain stable while (d) protofibrils decay
very slowly. (e) At pH 7 protofibrils kept at 37 °C remain stable.
Inserts: particle size distributions obtained with DLS at the beginning
(---) and end (__) of the incubation period.
Figure 6
Seeded aggregates have characteristics
of amyloid oligomers/protofibrils. (a) AFM images (from left
to right) of oligomeric seeds, and resulting
early stage protofibrils (5 days incubation) and late stage protofibrils
(3 weeks of incubation) grown via seeding of native lysozyme at pH
7 and 37 °C. (scale bar: 200 nm; color scale: height in nm).
(b) Fractional increases in off-line ThT fluorescence emission (■)
and light scattering intensity (●) during seeded growth of
native lysozyme. (c) Normalized FTIR difference spectra within the
Amide I band for late-stage amyloid aggregates at pH 7 formed after
incubation at either 70 or 37 °C, following subtraction of the
spectrum for lysozyme monomers.
Stability of amyloid aggregates at physiological temperature
and two pH values. AFM images of (a) lysozyme filaments and
(b) protofibrils formed during incubation at 70 °C and pH 3 in
100 or 250 mM NaCl, respectively. Scale bar: 200 nm; color scale:
aggregate height in nm. Images of oligomers/protofibrils at pH 7 are
provided in Figure 6a. Static light scattering
(Iscat) indicates that at 37 °C (c)
filaments formed at pH 3 remain stable while (d) protofibrils decay
very slowly. (e) At pH 7 protofibrils kept at 37 °C remain stable.
Inserts: particle size distributions obtained with DLS at the beginning
(---) and end (__) of the incubation period.To evaluate their thermal stability in the absence
of monomers,
seeds were separated from their monomer background using a 50 kDa
recovery filter and subsequent resuspension in buffer. Successful
separation and integrity of seeds was confirmed using DLS and AFM
imaging on the separated aggregates. The stability of isolated seeds
at 37 °C was determined by monitoring their scattering intensity
and particle size distributions for a minimum of 24 h. Amyloid filaments,
which represent the aggregate morphology most commonly associated
with amyloid diseases, remained stable at 37 °C (Figure 1c). Oligomer and protofibrils at pH 3 dissociated
slowly with a small monomer peak emerging in DLS after about 10 h
of incubation (Figure 1 d). The rate of decay
was sufficiently slow to consider these aggregates “stable”
for the purpose of subsequent seeding experiments at pH 3. Protofibrils
(Figure 1e) and oligomers generated at pH 7
showed no signs of decay or self-assembly at 37 °C. This stability
contrasts with the rapid dissociation of both isolated fibrils or
protofibrils at pH 3 and the rapid self-association of protofibrils
at pH 7 upon heating near 70 °C (data not shown). The gain in
thermal stability was not associated with any obvious changes to aggregate
sizes (DLS), morphologies (AFM), or structures (ATR-FTIR).Oligomers
and protofibrils are considered short-lived intermediates
of the assembly process. For lysozyme and beta-2 microglobulin, they
form along assembly pathways distinct from that for amyloid filament
assembly and are metastable against filament growth via seeding.[9,10] However, upon lowering solution temperature to physiological values,
oligomers and protofibrils retained their solubility and displayed
either very low rates (pH 3) or no discernible signs (pH 7) of either
fragmentation or dissociation into monomers. The observed thermal
stability of filaments should not be considered self-evident either.
This was highlighted by recent experiments on tau filaments which
readily formed at high temperatures, but dissolved when returned to
physiological temperatures.[32] Isolated
amyloid aggregates of lysozyme formed along either pathway, at a minimum,
dramatically reduce their rates of dissociation, fragmentation, and
self-association when lowering temperatures back into the physiological
range. The stability of various amyloid species close to physiological
conditions is relevant to the question how supposedly short-lived
and/or metastable amyloid species can migrate within tissues or even
the entire body, thereby spreading amyloid formation.
Amyloid Oligomers
and Protofibrils, but not Filaments, Induce
Native Lysozyme Aggregation
At denaturing temperatures used
for seed growth, oligomers, protofibrils, and filaments all readily
grow from partially unfolded lysozyme monomers.[28] At physiological temperatures spontaneous amyloid formation
from native proteins is not observed (see also Figure 4a below).[12,33] We therefore tested whether the
above long-lived amyloid species could induce fresh amyloid growth
when added to native lysozyme maintained at physiological temperatures
and pH. Initially we tested the behavior at pH 3 since it permitted
inclusion of rigid filaments. Amyloid seeds of either type were diluted
10-fold into solutions of native folded lysozyme at pH 3 using the
same solution composition as during seed formation, but maintaining
the temperature at 37 °C throughout. The particle size distributions
for fresh monomers seeded with amyloid filaments or mixtures of amyloid
oligomers and protofibrils are shown in Figure 2a and d, respectively. Amyloid filaments at various stages of assembly
were seeded into fresh monomers, but showed no discernible signs of
growth at 37 °C over 3 days (Figure 2b,
c). This indicates that monomeric filaments cannot utilize natively
folded lysozyme at pH 3/37 °C as the substrate for continued
growth. In stark contrast, oligomer/protofibrils at pH 3 readily induced
aggregation of native lysozyme solutions. Scattering intensity doubled
in as little as 18 h (Figure 2f), and the relative
size of the protofibril peak grew at the expense of the monomer peak
(Figure 2e). It is worth recalling that both
amyloid oligomers/protofibrils and filaments at pH 3 assemble spontaneously,
and continue to grow, once lysozyme is partially unfolded (T = 70 °C). Hence, both oligomers/protofibrils and
filaments form suitable templates for amyloid growth from partially
unfolded monomers. Upon return to 37 °C, lysozyme assumes its
native fold.[28] The ability of oligomers
and protofibrils to seed fresh growth at 37 °C, combined with
the inability of filaments to do so, implies the absence of even small
percentages of partially unfolded solution states which would have
supported continued growth of either template.
Figure 4
Seeded growth requires both oligomers/protofibrils and native
lysozyme, depletes native monomers. (a) Lack of changes in
the hydrodynamic radius Rh (■)
or light scattering intensity Iscat (○)
for native lysozyme incubated at pH 7 and 37 °C for one month.
(b) Changes in light scattering for lysozyme monomers incubated with
20% of either isolated protofibril (■) or monomers (○),
separated from each other prior to seeding into fresh monomers. (c)
Depletion of fresh lysozyme (20 mg/mL) during seeded growth at 37
°C with 15% (v/v) early stage purified protofibrils. Residual
monomer concentrations in the supernatant (■) after centrifugation
(2 h at 98 000 g), and light scattering intensities
(○) from aliquots of seeded solution were monitored for approximately
4.5 days.
Figure 2
Lysozyme oligomers
and protofibrils, but not filaments, induce
growth of native lysozyme. (a) DLS particle size distributions
of monomeric filaments seeded into native lysozyme. The short and
long monomeric filament peaks (S-MF, L-MF) are characteristic for
this assembly pathway.[10] Filament-seeded
monomer solutions displayed no changes in (b) size distribution or
(c) scattering intensity during 3 days of incubation. (d) Corresponding
size distribution for mixtures of oligomers (merged with monomer peak)
and protofibrils (40 nm peak) seeded into monomers. Within 16 h (f)
the scattering intensity from oligomers/protofibril-seeded samples
more than doubled. At the same time (e) the protofibril peak P grew
at the expense of the monomer peak M.
Lysozyme oligomers
and protofibrils, but not filaments, induce
growth of native lysozyme. (a) DLS particle size distributions
of monomeric filaments seeded into native lysozyme. The short and
long monomeric filament peaks (S-MF, L-MF) are characteristic for
this assembly pathway.[10] Filament-seeded
monomer solutions displayed no changes in (b) size distribution or
(c) scattering intensity during 3 days of incubation. (d) Corresponding
size distribution for mixtures of oligomers (merged with monomer peak)
and protofibrils (40 nm peak) seeded into monomers. Within 16 h (f)
the scattering intensity from oligomers/protofibril-seeded samples
more than doubled. At the same time (e) the protofibril peak P grew
at the expense of the monomer peak M.To ensure that monomers retain a native fold, we repeated
the seeding
experiments near the physiological pH of 7. After generating either
oligomers or mixtures of oligomers and protofibril at 70 °C at
various stages of self-assembly, they were diluted 5- to 20-fold into
1.4 mM of fresh lysozyme at 37 °C. Seeded solutions were incubated
for a period of time ranging from 4 days to 2 weeks. Solutions of
native lysozyme at 37 °C seeded with oligomers only (Figure 3a) displayed kinetic growth signatures similar to
those for barrier-free oligomer formation at denaturing temperatures,
albeit at much reduced growth rates.[10,21] This included
a prominent nucleation event associated with protofibril nucleation
(Figure 3b) and an accelerating increase in
scattering intensity, particularly after protofibril nucleation, resulting
in a 7-fold scattering increase over 2 weeks (Figure 3c). Seeding monomers with mixtures of protofibrils and oligomers
(Figure 3d) resulted in noticeably faster increases
in protofibril radii (Figure 3e) and scattering
intensities (Figure 3f).
Figure 3
Seeding native
lysozyme with oligomers and protofibrils at
pH 7. Particle size distribution derived from DLS for solutions
of lysozyme monomers at pH 7 seeded with 20% (v/v) of (a) oligomers
or (d) mixtures of oligomers and protofibrils. Labels indicate the
(merged) monomer/oligomer peak (M/O) and protofibril peak (P). The
dashed curve in (a) shows the distribution for monomers alone. Temporal
evolution in the peak radii for samples seeded with (b) oligomer-seeded
or (c) oligomer and protofibril. Corresponding changes in scattering
intensity are displayed in panels (c) and (f). The sample seeded with
oligomers nucleated protofibrils around 6 days (see panel b).
Seeding native
lysozyme with oligomers and protofibrils at
pH 7. Particle size distribution derived from DLS for solutions
of lysozyme monomers at pH 7 seeded with 20% (v/v) of (a) oligomers
or (d) mixtures of oligomers and protofibrils. Labels indicate the
(merged) monomer/oligomer peak (M/O) and protofibril peak (P). The
dashed curve in (a) shows the distribution for monomers alone. Temporal
evolution in the peak radii for samples seeded with (b) oligomer-seeded
or (c) oligomer and protofibril. Corresponding changes in scattering
intensity are displayed in panels (c) and (f). The sample seeded with
oligomers nucleated protofibrils around 6 days (see panel b).We performed a series of controls
to confirm that seeded growth
indeed represented induced aggregation of native monomers and required
amyloid oligomers/protofibrils instead of partially denatured monomers.
These control experiments were performed at pH 7 and 37 °C, because
it represents the biologically most relevant situation. Incubating
native lysozyme monomers without seeds, as expected, yielded no signs
of aggregation for up to 3 months (Figure 4a). Isolated oligomers
or protofibrils in the absence of lysozyme monomers also did not display
any tendency toward self-assembly at 37 °C (Figure 1e). We also seeded fresh monomers with either transient denatured
lysozyme monomers or amyloid protofibrils, separated from each other
after seed growth at 70 °C and brought to identical concentrations.
Only amyloid protofibrils induced aggregation of native lysozyme at
37 °C, indicating that the observed aggregation indeed required
both amyloid seeds and native monomers. Moreover, we determined whether
seeded aggregation did indeed consume fresh lysozyme monomers, instead
of reporting on some monomer-induced self-assembly process of seeds
only. Toward that end, fresh lysozyme solutions were incubated with
10% of isolated seeds. Concentrations of free monomers at various
times after seeding were determined by pelleting aggregates from aliquots
of growth solution via ultracentrifugation and measuring the residual
monomer concentration in the supernatant. Seed-induced aggregation
depleted monomers to levels far exceeding the original seed concentration
(10% v/v). Monomer depletion also correlated with aggregation-induced
increases in scattering intensity and particle sizes measured just
prior to ultracentrifugation (Figure 4c).Seeded growth requires both oligomers/protofibrils and native
lysozyme, depletes native monomers. (a) Lack of changes in
the hydrodynamic radius Rh (■)
or light scattering intensity Iscat (○)
for native lysozyme incubated at pH 7 and 37 °C for one month.
(b) Changes in light scattering for lysozyme monomers incubated with
20% of either isolated protofibril (■) or monomers (○),
separated from each other prior to seeding into fresh monomers. (c)
Depletion of fresh lysozyme (20 mg/mL) during seeded growth at 37
°C with 15% (v/v) early stage purified protofibrils. Residual
monomer concentrations in the supernatant (■) after centrifugation
(2 h at 98 000 g), and light scattering intensities
(○) from aliquots of seeded solution were monitored for approximately
4.5 days.The above data (Figures 2 and 3) establish that amyloid
oligomers and/or protofibrils, but
not filaments, were able to induce aggregation of native lysozyme
at physiological temperature. The capability of lysozyme oligomers
and protofibrils to seed fresh growth was preserved even at physiological
pH. The observed evolution in particle size distributions (DLS) and
scattering intensities (SLS) of seeded growth at physiological temperatures
replicated many of the distinct kinetics features (temporal evolution
of the particle size distributions; lag phase prior to protofibril
nucleation; slow near-linear increase in mean protofibril radius;
exponential growth in scattering intensity) associated with lysozyme
fibril growth along the oligomeric pathway at denaturing temperatures.[10,20,21]
Cross-seeding of Filaments
and Protofibrils
We attempted
to cross-seed protofibrils and filaments, generated during transient
denaturation at pH 3, into solutions of native lysozyme at pH 7. These
experiments first indicate whether amyloid templates remain stable
upon pH shifts. If successful, they also permit testing whether the
capacity for growth from native protein persists with changing solution
pH. Protofibrils and filaments at pH 3 were generated as described
above and then either directly transferred to pH 7 or dialyzed to
pH 7 and separated from monomers. Either way, oligomers and protofibrils
at any stage of assembly at pH 3 irreversibly precipitated from solution
at pH 7 making them unsuitable for seeding experiments. Filaments
also showed signs of precipitation following dialysis, but could be
resolubilized after passing them through 0.8 μm pore syringe
filters. Filaments, resolubilized at pH 7, were concentrated to 20
mg/mL and then seeded into fresh lysozyme at pH 7 and 37 °C.
Judged by the lack of change in scattering intensity or ThT response,
filaments in the presence of monomers did not grow (Figure 5). In contrast, protofibrils generated at pH 7 and
seeded into fresh monomers at the same concentration as filaments
displayed robust growth.
Figure 5
Cross-seeding of monomeric filaments. Seeds of monomeric
filaments were generated at pH 3, separated from monomers, dialyzed,
and resolubilized at pH 7. After concentrating seeds to 20 mg/mL,
they were diluted 10-fold into either 20 mg/mL of native lysozyme
or buffer only (pH 7, 40 mM NaCl) and incubated at 37 °C. Monomeric
filaments (MF) did not induce growth of hew-L monomers as indicated
by scattering intensity (a) or ThT fluorescence emission (b). In contrast,
protofibrils (PF) generated at pH 7, concentrated (20 mg/mL), and
diluted 10-fold into fresh monomers readily induced their self-replication
(a). Protofibrils generated at pH 3 could not be used as seeds since
they precipitated irreversibly following transfer to pH 7.
Cross-seeding of monomeric filaments. Seeds of monomeric
filaments were generated at pH 3, separated from monomers, dialyzed,
and resolubilized at pH 7. After concentrating seeds to 20 mg/mL,
they were diluted 10-fold into either 20 mg/mL of native lysozyme
or buffer only (pH 7, 40 mM NaCl) and incubated at 37 °C. Monomeric
filaments (MF) did not induce growth of hew-L monomers as indicated
by scattering intensity (a) or ThT fluorescence emission (b). In contrast,
protofibrils (PF) generated at pH 7, concentrated (20 mg/mL), and
diluted 10-fold into fresh monomers readily induced their self-replication
(a). Protofibrils generated at pH 3 could not be used as seeds since
they precipitated irreversibly following transfer to pH 7.
Morphological and Structural Analysis of
Aggregates Derived
from Seeded Growth at pH 7
To corroborate the amyloidogenic
character of aggregates formed at physiological temperature and pH
via seeded growth of native lysozyme we compared the aggregates’
morphological, tinctorial, and structural characteristics to those
for protofibrils grown at denaturing temperatures.[28] Figure 6a displays AFM images of lysozyme oligomers used for seeding and
the morphologies of the resulting aggregates formed after incubation
with native lysozyme at 37 °C for 5 days and 3 weeks, respectively.
Following incubation, increasing numbers of highly flexible protofibrils
appeared that tended to fold onto themselves upon deposition onto
mica surfaces. Aggregation in seeded lysozyme solutions at 37 °C
also increased thioflavin T fluorescence, a well-established amyloid
indicator dye. For a given sample, fractional increases in light scattering
vs ThT fluorescence intensity during incubation were of comparable
magnitude (Figure 6b), replicating features
of oligomer/protofibril growth at denaturing solution temperatures.[13] FTIR spectra for aggregates formed at either
37 or 70 °C, after subtraction from those of native monomers,
highlight aggregation-induced structural changes within the Amide-I
band (Figure 6c). Aggregates emerging at the
late stages of incubation at 70 °C or seeded growth at 37 °C
displayed decreases in their percentage of native α-helical
content (∼1660 cm–1) that correlated with
their concurrent increases in β-sheet structure between 1630
and 1610 cm–1. This latter band of wavenumbers is
considered diagnostic for β-sheet formation associated with
amyloid fibril growth.[27] We also find a
much weaker peak emerging near 1695 cm–1, which
has been associated with antiparallel β-sheets in Aβ amyloid
oligomers.[34] The above kinetic, morphological,
tinctorial, and structural characteristics confirm that aggregates
formed at physiological conditions via seeding native lysozyme with
oligomers/protofibrils are indistinguishable from oligomers and protofibrils
grown from partially denatured lysozyme.[28] Therefore, lysozyme amyloid oligomers or protofibrils, when stabilized
at 37 °C, do indeed induce their self-replication from native
lysozyme as the growth substrate.Seeded aggregates have characteristics
of amyloid oligomers/protofibrils. (a) AFM images (from left
to right) of oligomeric seeds, and resulting
early stage protofibrils (5 days incubation) and late stage protofibrils
(3 weeks of incubation) grown via seeding of native lysozyme at pH
7 and 37 °C. (scale bar: 200 nm; color scale: height in nm).
(b) Fractional increases in off-line ThT fluorescence emission (■)
and light scattering intensity (●) during seeded growth of
native lysozyme. (c) Normalized FTIR difference spectra within the
Amide I band for late-stage amyloid aggregates at pH 7 formed after
incubation at either 70 or 37 °C, following subtraction of the
spectrum for lysozyme monomers.
Seeded Oligomer/Protofibril Formation Suggests New Mode of Oligomeric
Self-Assembly
There are three major models widely considered
for amyloid self-assembly: templated assembly (TA),[35] nucleated polymerization (NP)[36] with variants accounting for secondary generation of new growth
ends via fragmentation of existing seeds (NP-F)[37] or via secondary surface nucleation of new seeds (NP-SN),[37] and nucleated conformational conversion (NCC).[26,38] These models make distinct predictions for the dependence of growth
rates on both seed and monomer concentrations. Specifically, TA growth
rates are reaction-limited by the number of seeds added to the system.
Nucleated polymerization and nucleated conformation conversion, in
turn, share characteristics of phase transitions. Consequently, seeds
should decay for monomer concentrations below their solubility. The
mechanisms of secondary generation incorporated into variants of nucleated
polymerization both predict exponential growth rates due to the multiplicative
increase of growth sites. However, fragmentation rates should be independent
of monomer concentration while secondary surface nucleation rates
will depend on both seed and monomer concentration. Nucleated models
also presume behavior reminiscent of phase transitions, which requires
monomer concentrations beyond some finite solubility limit, i.e. supersaturation.To gain insights into what model might account for our observations
of oligomer/protofibril growth under native solution conditions, we
explored its dependence on seed age and monomer concentration. A fixed
concentration of lysozyme monomers was seeded with oligomers only
(O), early stage protofibrils (ESP), or late-stage protofibrils (LSP).
Figure 6a shows a semilog plot of the increases
in scattering intensity with incubation period, and linear fits through
these data. The fits indicate that seeded growth from native monomers
accelerates exponentially in time. Such an exponential increase implies
the action of a mechanism for self-replicating growth units from those
already present (dN ∝ N(t)), similar to fragmentation or secondary
nucleation.[37,39] The sample seeded with oligomers
only also displayed a dramatic increase in the exponential growth
rate near 5 days which coincided with the nucleation of protofibrils
reported by DLS. Therefore, upon protofibril nucleation, this self-replication
mechanism becomes more efficient or an additional mechanism is activated.
The increases in growth rate with seed maturity suggest that the efficacy
of this mechanism might also increase with seed age, potentially through
a dependence on their contour length.To explore the mechanisms
of self-replication further, we tested
the dependence of growth on monomer concentration while keeping seed
concentration and age fixed. The initial slope of the temporal changes
in scattering intensity (see Figure 7a) was
taken as a measure of the growth rate of the seeded samples. Figure 7b is a log–log plot of the derived growth
rates vs monomer concentrations for samples seeded simultaneously
with 10% (v/v) of protofibrils from the same seed stock. The observed
growth rate increased in nearly direct proportion (power law exponent
0.85 ± 0.15) over 2 orders of magnitude in monomer concentration.
It displays no signs of a zero-point offset, indicative of a finite
solubility associated with a phase transition. It also lacks signs
of slowing down at high monomer concentrations as expected for a reaction-limited
growth process.
Figure 7
Dependence of growth kinetics on seed age and monomer
concentration. (a) Natural logarithm of the scattering intensity
(Iscat) for 20% (v/v) of amyloid oligomers
(O), early stage
protofibrils (ESP), or late-stage protofibrils (LSP) incubated with
native lysozyme at 37 °C and pH 7. Solid lines are exponential
fits with growth rate τ in days as indicated. The break in the
growth rate for (O) coincided with the nucleation of protofibrils.
(b) Log–log plot of the aggregate growth rate for solutions
of 10% (v/v) of purified protofibrils seeded into increasing concentrations
of lysozyme monomers (0.2–20 mg/mL). Aggregation rates were
equated to the slope of the factional increases in scattering intensity
near the onset of growth. A power law fit through the data (---) yielded
an exponent of 0.85 ± 0.16.
Dependence of growth kinetics on seed age and monomer
concentration. (a) Natural logarithm of the scattering intensity
(Iscat) for 20% (v/v) of amyloid oligomers
(O), early stage
protofibrils (ESP), or late-stage protofibrils (LSP) incubated with
native lysozyme at 37 °C and pH 7. Solid lines are exponential
fits with growth rate τ in days as indicated. The break in the
growth rate for (O) coincided with the nucleation of protofibrils.
(b) Log–log plot of the aggregate growth rate for solutions
of 10% (v/v) of purified protofibrils seeded into increasing concentrations
of lysozyme monomers (0.2–20 mg/mL). Aggregation rates were
equated to the slope of the factional increases in scattering intensity
near the onset of growth. A power law fit through the data (---) yielded
an exponent of 0.85 ± 0.16.Clearly, TA cannot account for the exponential increase in
growth
rates seen in Figure 7a. Furthermore, the rate-limiting
step in TA is considered to be the conversion of monomers to the template
structure. This would imply saturating growth rates at elevated monomer
concentrations, which was not observed (Figure 7b). The strong dependence of growth rates on monomer concentration
also excludes fragmentation as a mechanism for generating additional
growth sites since the latter depends on aggregate but not monomer
concentration.[37] The absence of fragmentation
is also evident from the lack of disintegration of isolated protofibrils
when dissolved in buffer (Figure 1). Finally,
the lack of a finite threshold to activate the self-replication process
is at odds with any nucleated process since the latter requires a
finite driving force (i.e., supersaturation). The inability to induce
amyloid formation by native monomers at any concentration in the absence
of seeds (Figure 3a), the lack of a lag phase
for oligomer formation under denaturing (seed growth) conditions,
and the immediate onset of growth from native monomers upon even modest
seed addition, all imply that variants of nucleated polymerization
and nucleated conformational conversion, by themselves, are difficult
to reconcile with the growth process reported here.
Orthogonal
Self-Replication and Nucleated Polymerization
These discrepancies
with existing models compel us to propose a new
model for oligomeric fibril growth from native monomers. The essential
features this model attempts to incorporate are a lack of spontaneous
oligomer formation from native monomers, exponential growth when seeding
native monomers with preformed oligomers, no discernible threshold
for the onset of oligomer formation, the presence of a nucleation
barrier for protofibril formation, and the previously reported morphological[15] and structural similarities of oligomers and
protofibrils.[28] These features are consistent
with two distinct “activities” of oligomers and protofibrils
that operate “orthogonal” from each other: self-replication
of oligomers from native monomers via a mechanism resembling a bimolecular
reaction combined with nucleated polymerization of protofibrils from
oligomers which resembles a nucleated phase separation. Figure 8 summarizes the aggregation behavior for oligomers/protofibrils
vs those of filaments at denaturing vs native temperatures. At denaturing
temperatures, amyloid filament growth proceeds via nucleated polymerization,
with likely contributions from secondary generation. At physiological
temperatures, these filaments are stable against dissociation or fragmentation,
but can neither nucleate nor grow from native monomers. Along the
oligomeric assembly pathway partially denatured monomers undergo barrier-free
self-assembly into oligomers which, in turn, undergo nucleated polymerization.
It should be noted that protofibril nucleation does not leave a clear
signature in either ThT or SLS kinetics, but is readily apparent in
DLS.[21] At physiological temperatures, spontaneous
formation of oligomers from monomers at even the highest concentrations
is not observed, arguing further against a phase separation process.
Upon addition of preformed and stabile oligomers (or protofibrils),
their self-replication from native monomers emerges. Under denaturing
conditions the ability for self-replication is concealed by the high
rate of spontaneous oligomer assembly from denatured monomers. Similar
to enzymes acting on their substrate, this autocatalytic self-replication
mechanism has no discernible substrate threshold. Self-replication,
in turn, accounts for the lack of a saturation threshold at high substrate
concentrations. We further surmise that the subsequent polymerization
of protofibrils uses oligomers as the growth substrate and proceeds
at a site distinct from that for self-replication. Based on the identical
cross-sectional areas of oligomers and protofibrils measured with
calibrated AFM we have previously argued that oligomers, not monomers,
are the growth substrate for lysozyme protofibrils.[21] With oligomers as their growth substrate, protofibrils
can only continue to elongate in the presence of native monomers if
they provide two distinct sites, one for generating oligomers from
native monomers and another for using them as a substrate for elongation.
This uncoupling of activities is also supported by the observation
that protofibril formation is a nucleated process while replication
of oligomer from either oligomeric or protofibril seeds will proceed
without a threshold.
Figure 8
Oligomeric vs filamentous amyloid growth at denaturing
vs
native temperatures. Schematic of the free energy landscape
for oligomeric (left) vs filamentous (right) amyloid growth at denaturing
(top) vs physiological (bottom) temperatures. Solid arrows indicate
processes while dashed lines represent nucleated processes. At denaturing
temperatures, oligomers and protofibrils utilize denatured monomers
as growth substrate. Oligomers, in turn, become the substrate for
subsequent nucleation and polymerization of protofibrils. At physiological
temperatures no amyloid seed can form spontaneously from native monomers.
Preformed oligomers, but not filaments, can self-replicate from native
monomers.
Oligomeric vs filamentous amyloid growth at denaturing
vs
native temperatures. Schematic of the free energy landscape
for oligomeric (left) vs filamentous (right) amyloid growth at denaturing
(top) vs physiological (bottom) temperatures. Solid arrows indicate
processes while dashed lines represent nucleated processes. At denaturing
temperatures, oligomers and protofibrils utilize denatured monomers
as growth substrate. Oligomers, in turn, become the substrate for
subsequent nucleation and polymerization of protofibrils. At physiological
temperatures no amyloid seed can form spontaneously from native monomers.
Preformed oligomers, but not filaments, can self-replicate from native
monomers.
Discussion
Studies
of amyloid fibril assembly under controlled in
vitro conditions are critical for unraveling the molecular
mechanisms underlying amyloid fibril formation in vivo. Our current understanding of molecular aggregation mechanisms,
however, is mostly derived from in vitro studies
under fixed solution conditions which, in the case of native proteins,
require partial denaturation.[11] Computations
with model peptides in two and three dimensions have suggested that
amyloid aggregation might proceed utilizing different conformations
of monomers and aggregates, which can interact in distinct ways upon
changes in solution environment (temperature, pH, ionic strength,
concentration).[15] This implies that mechanisms
for amyloid self-assembly observed under partially denaturing conditions
might not be fully representative of those active under physiological
conditions. Our observations on lysozyme amyloid formation at denaturing
vs physiological temperatures do indeed reveal significant changes
to the thermodynamic stability, solubility, rates of fragmentation,
and aggregation propensity of oligomeric vs filamentous amyloid aggregates.
They particularly suggest that oligomer formation at denaturing vs
physiological temperatures switches from the spontaneous self-assembly
of partially denatured monomers to autocatalytic self-replication
from native monomers.Lowering solution temperatures into the
physiological range resulted
in either dramatic reduction of dissociation/fragmentation or self-association
rates, or in complete stabilization for each of the amyloidogenic
hew-L aggregates. The stability of isolated filaments might seem obvious.
Yet, tau filaments generated at high temperatures readily dissociated
at physiological temperatures unless they were stabilized by an extrinsic
cofactor such as heparin.[32] The emergence
of the thermodynamic stability of oligomers at physiological pH and
temperature is intriguing since oligomers are typically considered
short-lived transients or metastable intermediates of the amyloid
assembly process.[40] Similarly, the loss
of solubility of all aggregates upon increasing solution pH, while
not surprising, further highlights that the properties of various
templates also depend on the conditions they were generated under.
Our observations suggest that the solubility and mechanical stability
of all amyloid species are highly sensitive to their solution environment.
The gain of stability of amyloid aggregates under physiological conditions
is a property that is clearly relevant for understanding how these
aggregates might spread to other cells and tissues and, potentially,
promote formation of new amyloid growth there. Changes in solubility
of amyloid aggregates with solution environment is equally germane
for our understanding of functional amyloids.[41][42] For example, peptide hormones stored
as amyloids in the low-pH environment of dense-core vesicles have
to remain stable, but need to dissolve rapidly upon release into the
bloodstream.[43]Most significantly,
though, is the ability for self-replication
that emerged at physiological temperatures. Surprisingly, only oligomers
and protofibrils were able to induce autocatalytic self-replication
from natively folded lysozyme. The long rigid filaments considered
most “representative” of amyloid aggregates, in contrast,
remained inert at physiological temperatures. This is in stark contrast
to the behavior of filaments at partially denaturing temperatures.
Thermally denatured lysozyme monomers represent favorable substrates
for the nucleation and growth of amyloid aggregates along either assembly
pathway.[10] Rapid filaments growth at denaturing
temperatures vs their lack of growth at native temperatures implies
that filaments require denatured monomers as a growth
substrate. Conversely, the ability of oligomers and protofibrils,
but not filaments, to seed growth at native temperatures highlights
that seeded amyloid formation by native proteins depends not only
on monomer stability and structure but on the stability and structure
of amyloid templates and their interactions with their monomeric substrate.
It further implies that only a subset of amyloid aggregates might
have the capacity for autocatalytic self-replication required for
their prion-like propagation in tissue.[17,44] It is worth
reiterating that there is no sign of spontaneous oligomer formation
at native solution conditions (Figure 3a).
Under the denaturing conditions used for seed growth, barrier-free
assembly from denatured monomers is the dominant process for oligomer
formation. Hence, the capacity of lysozyme amyloid oligomers and protofibrils
for self-replication only becomes apparent at physiological conditions
where spontaneous self-assembly is abrogated.Are there any
hints regarding how structural differences might
account for the observed capacity for self-replication for oligomers
and protofibrils but not filaments? We have previously shown that
lysozyme filaments, oligomers, and protofibrils all develop β-sheet
peaks in the “amyloid-band” of their FTIR spectra.[28,45] Therefore, they all represent amyloid-like aggregates, albeit with
distinguishable structural fingerprints.[28] Specifically, the slight differences in the peak positions for filaments
vs oligomers near 1620 cm–1 and the weak shoulder
for oligomers/protofibrils near 1695 cm–1 both hint
at underlying structural differences between these two aggregate species.
These differences might well correlate with the β-sheet-rich
but distinct structures recently reported for amyloid filaments vs
oligomers reported for model peptides.[2,46,47] However, we presume that not all oligomers are created
equal. This is suggested by variations in the toxicity for oligomers
from the N-terminal of bacterial HypF when generated at different
pH’s.[3] In contrast to the β-sheet
enriched oligomers in this study, liquid-like disordered oligomers
have been implicated to underlie nucleated conformational conversion
of poly-Q.[24] The ability of oligomers and
their polymers for self-replication from native protein further adds
to the growing list of pathogenic features ascribed to this class
of amyloid aggregates.[3,4,7,48,49] It also reproduces
one defining characteristic of prion proteins: in vitro self-replication.[35,50] The structural features that
imbue lysozyme oligomers with the capacity for self-replication are
not obvious, and whether this “gain of function” is
limited to only certain oligomers remains to be determined.The data on seeded amyloid growth with native lysozyme also suggest
that the observed self-replication and polymerization of amyloid oligomers
requires a new molecular model for oligomeric amyloid growth.[51] Figure 8 summarizes how
we envision the temperature-induced changes in the aggregation behavior
along the filamentous and oligomeric assembly pathways seen in our
experiments. As outlined above, neither templated assembly nor nucleated
polymerization with inclusion of secondary mechanisms nor nucleated
conformational conversion is fully consistent with the kinetics of
oligomeric amyloid growth under native conditions. Our proposed model
of “orthogonal autocatalytic self-replication and nucleated
polymerization” shares important similarities with basic aspects
of these existing models. Most prominently, self-replication provides
a mechanism for spawning new aggregates similar to secondary nucleation
and, thereby, generates exponential growth. In addition, we expect
the nucleated polymerization of protofibrils to replicate most aspects
of the current models of nucleated polymerization of filaments with
a secondary nucleation pathway. It is worthwhile to also highlight
the basic differences among existing models. First of all, oligomer
self-replication proceeds without a discernible lower threshold concentration
of monomers (saturation concentration). This implies that self-replication
has the characteristics of an autocatalytic chemical reaction instead
of a phase separation phenomenon (Figure 7b).
The lack of saturation at high monomer concentrations, in turn, is
a simple consequence of the autocatalytic feedback cycle in which
the product of one replication cycle serves as the “enzyme”
in the next cycle. Furthermore, the growth substrate for oligomer
formation and protofibril elongation in our model are two distinct
species: native monomers are the substrate for oligomer self-replication
while protofibril nucleation and polymerization utilize oligomers.
The separation of self-replication and elongation allows these two
processes to proceed in a coordinated fashion that feeds back onto
each other.Overall, our results suggest that the process of
amyloid fibril
assembly, while displaying various generic aspects, might proceed
through a variety of different pathways. Multiple assembly mechanisms
become dominant not just by changes in monomer structure but by the
type of amyloid aggregate formed and its specific propensity to interact
with various monomeric conformations under various solution conditions.
Such a diversity of mechanisms might help explain the wide variety
of phenotypes and aggregation behavior reported for both pathological
and functional amyloids.
Authors: M R Krebs; D K Wilkins; E W Chung; M C Pitkeathly; A K Chamberlain; J Zurdo; C V Robinson; C M Dobson Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2000-07-14 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: James P Cleary; Dominic M Walsh; Jacki J Hofmeister; Ganesh M Shankar; Michael A Kuskowski; Dennis J Selkoe; Karen H Ashe Journal: Nat Neurosci Date: 2004-12-19 Impact factor: 24.884
Authors: Samir K Maji; Marilyn H Perrin; Michael R Sawaya; Sebastian Jessberger; Krishna Vadodaria; Robert A Rissman; Praful S Singru; K Peter R Nilsson; Rozalyn Simon; David Schubert; David Eisenberg; Jean Rivier; Paul Sawchenko; Wylie Vale; Roland Riek Journal: Science Date: 2009-06-18 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Maria F Mossuto; Anne Dhulesia; Glyn Devlin; Erica Frare; Janet R Kumita; Patrizia Polverino de Laureto; Mireille Dumoulin; Angelo Fontana; Christopher M Dobson; Xavier Salvatella Journal: J Mol Biol Date: 2010-07-17 Impact factor: 5.469
Authors: Douglas M Fowler; Atanas V Koulov; Christelle Alory-Jost; Michael S Marks; William E Balch; Jeffery W Kelly Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Rosa Crespo; Eva Villar-Alvarez; Pablo Taboada; Fernando A Rocha; Ana M Damas; Pedro M Martins Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 2015-11-24 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Carlos Perez; Tatiana Miti; Filip Hasecke; Georg Meisl; Wolfgang Hoyer; Martin Muschol; Ghanim Ullah Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 2019-06-27 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: Sara Catalini; Viviane Lutz-Bueno; Mattia Usuelli; Michael Diener; Andrea Taschin; Paolo Bartolini; Paolo Foggi; Marco Paolantoni; Raffaele Mezzenga; Renato Torre Journal: iScience Date: 2022-06-10
Authors: Gang Wei; Zhiqiang Su; Nicholas P Reynolds; Paolo Arosio; Ian W Hamley; Ehud Gazit; Raffaele Mezzenga Journal: Chem Soc Rev Date: 2017-07-31 Impact factor: 54.564
Authors: Sara Catalini; Diego R Perinelli; Paola Sassi; Lucia Comez; Giovanni F Palmieri; Assunta Morresi; Giulia Bonacucina; Paolo Foggi; Stefania Pucciarelli; Marco Paolantoni Journal: Biomacromolecules Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 6.988