Literature DB >> 20052512

Perception of biological motion in common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus): by females only.

J Brown1, G Kaplan, L J Rogers, G Vallortigara.   

Abstract

The ability to perceive biological motion (BM) has been demonstrated in a number of species including humans but the few studies of non-human primates have been relatively inconclusive. We investigated whether common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus) are able to perceive biological motion, using a novel method to test non-human primates. Marmosets (7 male and 7 female) were trained to remove a cover from a container and look inside it, revealing a computer screen. Then they were presented with images on this computer screen consisting of a novel BM pattern (a walking hen) and 4 manipulations of that pattern (a static frame of this pattern and inverted, scrambled, and rotating versions of the pattern). The behavioural responses of the marmosets were recorded and used to assess discrimination between stimuli. BM was attended to by females but not males, as shown by active inspection behaviour, mainly movement of the head towards the stimulus. Females paid significantly less attention to all of the other stimuli. This indicates the females' ability to attend to biological motion. Females showed slightly more attention to the inverted BM than to the static, scrambled, and rotating patterns. The males were less attentive to all of the stimuli than were the females and, unlike the females, responded to all stimuli in a similar manner. This sex difference could be due to an inability of males to recognise BM altogether or to a lesser amount of curiosity. Considered together with the findings of previous studies on chicks and humans, the results of the present study support the notion of a common mechanism across species for the detection of BM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20052512     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0306-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  18 in total

1.  Reversal learning in gonadectomized marmosets with and without hormone replacement: are males more sensitive to punishment?

Authors:  Matthew LaClair; Agnès Lacreuse
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2016-02-24       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Experimental Divergences in the Visual Cognition of Birds and Mammals.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Comp Cogn Behav Rev       Date:  2015

Review 3.  The human newborn's umwelt: Unexplored pathways and perspectives.

Authors:  Vanessa André; Séverine Henry; Alban Lemasson; Martine Hausberger; Virginie Durier
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-02

4.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Do rats (Rattus norvegicus) perceive biological motion?

Authors:  Laura M MacKinnon; Nikolaus F Troje; Hans C Dringenberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-08-03       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Brain circuits signaling the absence of emotion in body language.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Peter Zeidman; Michael Erb; Frank E Pollick; Andreas J Fallgatter; Philippe Ryvlin; Karl J Friston; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-08-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Comparative thanatology, an integrative approach: exploring sensory/cognitive aspects of death recognition in vertebrates and invertebrates.

Authors:  André Gonçalves; Dora Biro
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  Familiarity perception call elicited under restricted sensory cues in peer-social interactions of the domestic chick.

Authors:  Mamiko Koshiba; Yuka Shirakawa; Koki Mimura; Aya Senoo; Genta Karino; Shun Nakamura
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Biological motion stimuli are attractive to medaka fish.

Authors:  Tomohiro Nakayasu; Eiji Watanabe
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Emotion through locomotion: gender impact.

Authors:  Samuel Krüger; Alexander N Sokolov; Paul Enck; Ingeborg Krägeloh-Mann; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.