Literature DB >> 16895459

Learning to discriminate complex movements: biological versus artificial trajectories.

Jan Jastorff1, Zoe Kourtzi, Martin A Giese.   

Abstract

The recognition of complex body movements and actions is a fundamental visual capacity very important for social communication. It seems possible that movement recognition is based on a general capability of the visual system to learn complex visual motion patterns. Alternatively, this visual function might exploit specialized mechanisms for the analysis of biologically relevant movements, for example, of humans or animals. To investigate this question, we trained human observers to discriminate novel motion patterns that were generated, exploiting a new technique for stimulus generation by motion morphing. We tested the learning of different classes of novel movement stimuli. One group of stimuli was fully consistent with human movements. A second class of stimuli was based on artificial skeleton models that were inconsistent with human and animal bodies. A third group of stimuli specified the same local motion information as human movements but was inconsistent with an underlying articulated shape. Participants learned both classes of articulated movements very fast in an orientation-dependent manner. Learning speed and accuracy were strikingly similar and independent of the similarity of the stimuli with biologically relevant body shapes. For the class of stimuli without underlying articulated shape, however, we did not observe significant improvements of the discrimination performance after training. Our results indicate the existence of a fast visual learning process for complex articulated movement patterns, which likely is relevant for biological motion perception. This process seems to operate independently of the consistency of the patterns with biologically relevant body shapes but seems to require the compatibility of the learned movements with a global underlying shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16895459     DOI: 10.1167/6.8.3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  18 in total

1.  Common neural correlates of emotion perception in humans.

Authors:  Jan Jastorff; Yun-An Huang; Martin A Giese; Mathieu Vandenbulcke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Flexible coding for categorical decisions in the human brain.

Authors:  Sheng Li; Dirk Ostwald; Martin Giese; Zoe Kourtzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  A model for production, perception, and acquisition of actions in face-to-face communication.

Authors:  Bernd J Kröger; Stefan Kopp; Anja Lowit
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2009-12-10

4.  Experts see it all: configural effects in action observation.

Authors:  Beatriz Calvo-Merino; Shantel Ehrenberg; Delia Leung; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2009-10-25

5.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Functional connectivity in the resting-state motor networks influences the kinematic processes during motor sequence learning.

Authors:  Laura Bonzano; Eleonora Palmaro; Roxana Teodorescu; Lazar Fleysher; Matilde Inglese; Marco Bove
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Functional dissociation between anterior temporal lobe and inferior frontal gyrus in the processing of dynamic body expressions: Insights from behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia.

Authors:  Jan Jastorff; Francois-Laurent De Winter; Jan Van den Stock; Rik Vandenberghe; Martin A Giese; Mathieu Vandenbulcke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Anterior Temporal Lobectomy Impairs Neural Classification of Body Emotions in Right Superior Temporal Sulcus and Reduces Emotional Enhancement in Distributed Brain Areas without Affecting Behavioral Classification.

Authors:  Laura Van de Vliet; Jan Jastorff; Yun-An Huang; Wim Van Paesschen; Mathieu Vandenbulcke; Jan Van den Stock
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Bird expertise does not increase motion sensitivity to bird flight motion.

Authors:  Simen Hagen; Quoc C Vuong; Michael D Chin; Lisa S Scott; Tim Curran; James W Tanaka
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  The resting human brain and motor learning.

Authors:  Neil B Albert; Edwin M Robertson; R Chris Miall
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 10.834

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.