Literature DB >> 12206531

Active versus passive processing of biological motion.

Ian M Thornton1, Ronald A Rensink, Maggie Shiffrar.   

Abstract

Johansson's point-light walker figures remain one of the most powerful and convincing examples of the role that motion can play in the perception of form (Johansson, 1973 Perception & Psychophysics 14 201 - 211; 1975 Scientific American 232(6) 76 - 88). In the current work, we use a dual-task paradigm to explore the role of attention in the processing of such stimuli. In two experiments we find striking differences in the degree to which direction-discrimination performance in point-light walker displays appears to rely on attention. Specifically, we find that performance in displays thought to involve top-down processing, either in time (experiment 1) or space (experiment 2) is adversely affected by dividing attention. In contrast, dividing attention has little effect on performance in displays that allow low-level, bottom-up computations to be carried out. We interpret these results using the active/passive motion distinction introduced by Cavanagh (1991 Spatial Vision 5 303-309).

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12206531     DOI: 10.1068/p3072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  28 in total

1.  The psychophysics of visual motion and global form processing in autism.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; David Whitney; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-11-03       Impact factor: 13.501

2.  Neural correlates of coherent and biological motion perception in autism.

Authors:  Kami Koldewyn; David Whitney; Susan M Rivera
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2011-06-18

3.  Structural and effective brain connectivity underlying biological motion detection.

Authors:  Arseny A Sokolov; Peter Zeidman; Michael Erb; Philippe Ryvlin; Karl J Friston; Marina A Pavlova
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Ensemble coding of crowd speed using biological motion.

Authors:  Tram T N Nguyen; Quoc C Vuong; George Mather; Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-09       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Visual control of an action discrimination in pigeons.

Authors:  Muhammad A J Qadri; Yael Asen; Robert G Cook
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-05-30       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  The 'when' pathway of the right parietal lobe.

Authors:  Lorella Battelli; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 20.229

7.  Stepping into the genetics of biological motion processing.

Authors:  Ian M Thornton
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Emotional cues and social anxiety resolve ambiguous perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Hörmet Yiltiz; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Heritable aspects of biological motion perception and its covariation with autistic traits.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Li Wang; Qian Xu; Dong Liu; Lihong Chen; Nikolaus F Troje; Sheng He; Yi Jiang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Neural integration of information specifying human structure from form, motion, and depth.

Authors:  Stuart Jackson; Randolph Blake
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.