Literature DB >> 24876936

Minimally invasive and robotic Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Lingling Huang1, Mark Onaitis1.   

Abstract

Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common malignancy and the sixth most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Esophagectomy provides a curative treatment but carries significant morbidity and mortality. Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE) is one of the most commonly employed open techniques of esophagectomy. Minimally invasive approaches have been explored in ILE in an effort to reduce operative morbidity. This article reviews recent literature of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (MI-ILE), discusses its clinical outcomes, and introduces the robotic approach in MI-ILE. MI-ILE has demonstrated comparable postoperative outcomes to open ILE, and it has shown potential to reduce blood loss and length of hospitalization. Due to limited studies, no significant improvement of long-term survival has been reported in MI-ILE. Robotic ILE is safe and feasible, but more studies are needed to prove identifiable benefits. Randomized controlled trials comparing MI-ILE or robotic ILE with conventional open ILE are warranted to determine the optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophageal cancer; Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (ILE); minimally invasive surgery

Year:  2014        PMID: 24876936      PMCID: PMC4037415          DOI: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2014.04.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Dis        ISSN: 2072-1439            Impact factor:   2.895


  37 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  Jon O Wee; Christopher R Morse
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy at a single, high-volume centre.

Authors:  Smita Sihag; Cameron D Wright; John C Wain; Henning A Gaissert; Michael Lanuti; James S Allan; Douglas J Mathisen; Christopher R Morse
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 4.191

3.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  J B Hulscher; J G Tijssen; H Obertop; J J van Lanschot
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  A preliminary experience with minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Authors:  L F Tapias; C R Morse
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.429

5.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A safe and reproducible anastomotic technique for minimally invasive Ivor Lewis oesophagectomy: the circular-stapled anastomosis with the trans-oral anvil.

Authors:  Guilherme M Campos; David Jablons; Lisa M Brown; René M Ramirez; Charlotte Rabl; Pierre Theodore
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2010-02-12       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy is safe and effective following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George Rossidis; Robert A Zlotecki; Stephen R Grobmyer; Juan C Cendan; George A Sarosi; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-04-09       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  D J Mathisen; H C Grillo; E W Wilkins; A C Moncure; A D Hilgenberg
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Miguel Alvelo-Rivera; Percival O Buenaventura; Neil A Christie; James S McCaughan; Virginia R Litle; Philip R Schauer; John M Close; Hiran C Fernando
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Short-term outcomes following total minimally invasive oesophagectomy.

Authors:  R G Berrisford; S A Wajed; D Sanders; M W M Rucklidge
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.939

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Authors:  Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán; Marcos Gómez-Ruiz; Soledad Trugeda-Carrera; Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos; Antonio López-Useros; Manuel Gómez-Fleitas
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-14       Impact factor: 5.742

2.  Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy: is it advantageous over thoracoscopic esophagectomy?

Authors:  Mong-Wei Lin; Jang-Ming Lee
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  Past, present and future of Barrett's oesophagus.

Authors:  W K Tan; M di Pietro; R C Fitzgerald
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.424

4.  Better perioperative outcomes in thoracoscopic-esophagectomy with two-lung ventilation in semi-prone position.

Authors:  Lei Cai; Yan Li; Li Sun; Xue-Wen Yang; Wen-Bin Wang; Fan Feng; Guang-Hui Xu; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Hong-Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Single Snapshot Imaging of Optical Properties (SSOP) for Perfusion Assessment during Gastric Conduit Creation for Esophagectomy: An Experimental Study on Pigs.

Authors:  Lorenzo Cinelli; Eric Felli; Luca Baratelli; Silvère Ségaud; Andrea Baiocchini; Nariaki Okamoto; María Rita Rodríguez-Luna; Ugo Elmore; Riccardo Rosati; Stefano Partelli; Jacques Marescaux; Sylvain Gioux; Michele Diana
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.639

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.