Literature DB >> 26877605

Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions.

Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán1, Marcos Gómez-Ruiz1, Soledad Trugeda-Carrera1, Carlos Manuel-Palazuelos1, Antonio López-Useros1, Manuel Gómez-Fleitas1.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery is applied today worldwide to most digestive procedures. In some of them, such as cholecystectomy, Nissen's fundoplication or obesity surgery, laparoscopy has become the standard in practice. In others, such as colon or gastric resection, the laparoscopic approach is frequently used and its usefulness is unquestionable. More complex procedures, such as esophageal, liver or pancreatic resections are, however, more infrequently performed, due to the high grade of skill necessary. As a result, there is less clinical evidence to support its implementation. In the recent years, robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly applied, again with little evidence for comparison with the conventional laparoscopic approach. This review will focus on the complex digestive procedures as well as those whose use in standard practice could be more controversial. Also novel robot-assisted procedures will be updated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colectomy; Esophagectomy; Gastrectomy; Laparoscopic training; Laparoscopy; Liver resection; Obesity surgery; Pancreatectomy; Robotic surgery

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26877605      PMCID: PMC4726673          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i6.1975

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


  317 in total

1.  A propensity score-matched case-control comparative study of laparoscopic and open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Keun Soo Ahn; Koo Jeong Kang; Yong Hoon Kim; Tae-Seok Kim; Tae Jin Lim
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.878

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Successful implementation of the american college of surgeons/association of program directors in surgery surgical skills curriculum via a 4-week consecutive simulation rotation.

Authors:  Mayank Kumar Mittal; Kristoffel R Dumon; Paula Kaitlyn Edelson; Natalia Martinez Acero; Daniel Hashimoto; Enrico Danzer; Ben Selvan; Andrew S Resnick; Jon B Morris; Noel N Williams
Journal:  Simul Healthc       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 1.929

Review 4.  Robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of short outcomes.

Authors:  Binghong Xiong; Li Ma; Caiquan Zhang
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 3.279

5.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer: short-term outcomes of a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ruben Veldkamp; Esther Kuhry; Wim C J Hop; J Jeekel; G Kazemier; H Jaap Bonjer; Eva Haglind; Lars Påhlman; Miguel A Cuesta; Simon Msika; Mario Morino; Antonio M Lacy
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 41.316

7.  Total laparoscopic living donor right hepatectomy.

Authors:  Ho-Seong Han; Jai Young Cho; Yoo-Seok Yoon; Dae Wook Hwang; Young Ki Kim; Hong Kyung Shin; Woohyung Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Group trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Daniel J Sargent; Erin Green; Mehran Anvari; Steven J Stryker; Robert W Beart; Michael Hellinger; Richard Flanagan; Walter Peters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Myura Nagendran; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Rajesh Aggarwal; Marilena Loizidou; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-08-27
View more
  14 in total

1.  The learning curve for a surgeon in robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a retrospective study in a high-volume pancreatic center.

Authors:  Tao Zhang; Zhi-Ming Zhao; Yuan-Xing Gao; Wan Yee Lau; Rong Liu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Toward a standard ontology of surgical process models.

Authors:  Bernard Gibaud; Germain Forestier; Carolin Feldmann; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Paulo Gonçalves; Tamás Haidegger; Chantal Julliard; Darko Katić; Hannes Kenngott; Lena Maier-Hein; Keno März; Elena de Momi; Dénes Ákos Nagy; Hirenkumar Nakawala; Juliane Neumann; Thomas Neumuth; Javier Rojas Balderrama; Stefanie Speidel; Martin Wagner; Pierre Jannin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Growth in robotic-assisted procedures is from conversion of laparoscopic procedures and not from open surgeons' conversion: a study of trends and costs.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Spyridon Pagkratis; Eugene Boilesen; Tiffany Tanner; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Review of emerging surgical robotic technology.

Authors:  Brian S Peters; Priscila R Armijo; Crystal Krause; Songita A Choudhury; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Margin Positivity in Resectable Esophageal Cancer: Are there Modifiable Risk Factors?

Authors:  Cary Jo R Schlick; Rhami Khorfan; David D Odell; Ryan P Merkow; David J Bentrem
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 6.  Curative and palliative surgery in patients with neuroendocrine tumors of the gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) tract.

Authors:  Peter E Goretzki; Martina T Mogl; Aycan Akca; Johann Pratschke
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 6.514

7.  A retrospective comparison of robotic cholecystectomy versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: operative outcomes and cost analysis.

Authors:  David S Strosberg; Michelle C Nguyen; Peter Muscarella; Vimal K Narula
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-05       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Standard laparoscopic versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Jeremy A Warren; William S Cobb; Joseph A Ewing; Alfredo M Carbonell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of analgesic requirements in robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic abdominal surgeries.

Authors:  Athira Suresh Mangalath; Lakshmi Kumar; Ambreen Basheer Sawant; Rajesh Kesavan; Greeshma Ravindran; Rajan Sunil
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-10

10.  Robot-assisted sacral tumor resection: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Junqiang Yin; Hui Wu; Jian Tu; Changye Zou; Gang Huang; Xianbiao Xie; Yulong He; Jingnan Shen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.362

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.