Literature DB >> 3277551

Transthoracic esophagectomy: a safe approach to carcinoma of the esophagus.

D J Mathisen1, H C Grillo, E W Wilkins, A C Moncure, A D Hilgenberg.   

Abstract

Transthoracic esophagogastrectomy is a safe operation. Mechanical staplers and a cervical anastomosis have been emphasized to avoid catastrophic consequences of anastomotic leaks in the chest. Transhiatal esophagectomy has been proposed to bring the anastomosis into the neck. It is meant to be a palliative procedure and consequently denies the patient the best chance for surgical cure. The emphasis should be on anastomotic technique and sound principles of surgical oncology. Since 1980, we have performed 104 esophagectomies for carcinoma of the esophagus. We used a left thoracoabdominal incision for distal tumors (64) and the Ivor Lewis technique (40) for more proximal tumors. A two-layer inverting interrupted silk suture technique was used for all anastomoses. More than 90% of the procedures were performed by resident staff. The operative mortality was 2.9% (3 patients). There were no anastomotic leaks. Five patients required between one dilation and three dilations postoperatively. A positive smoking history was present in 83 patients and substantial alcohol use, in 33. Median estimated blood loss was 500 ml, and 60% of patients required no transfusions. Major complications included pneumonia (12 patients) and reexploration for bleeding (2). Minor complications included atelectasis (71 patients), atrial fibrillation (9), ventricular arrhythmias (9), urinary tract infection (3), and wound infection (2). Squamous cancer was present in 31 patients and adenocarcinoma, in 73. Positive lymph node metastases were present in 75%. Anastomotic recurrence was documented in 6 patients. Standard techniques of esophagogastrectomy and a two-layer anastomosis will give excellent results with low mortality and acceptable morbidity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3277551     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62424-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  26 in total

1.  Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1000 patients.

Authors:  James D Luketich; Arjun Pennathur; Omar Awais; Ryan M Levy; Samuel Keeley; Manisha Shende; Neil A Christie; Benny Weksler; Rodney J Landreneau; Ghulam Abbas; Matthew J Schuchert; Katie S Nason
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  High grade dysplasia: surveillance, mucosal ablation, or resection?

Authors:  Robert J Korst; Nasser K Altorki
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-08-18       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  Cancer of the oesophagus.

Authors:  J Bancewicz
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-01-06

Review 4.  Surgical solutions for esophageal dysphagia.

Authors:  R F Heitmiller
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.438

5.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Nadeem UlNazeer Kawoosa; Abdul Majeed Dar; Mukand Lal Sharma; Abdul Gani Ahangar; Ghulam Nabi Lone; Mohammad Akbar Bhat; Shyam Singh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Experiences in the management of anastomotic leakages and analysis of the factors affecting leakage healing in patients with esophagogastric junction cancer.

Authors:  Ningning Ding; Yousheng Mao; Jie He; Shugeng Gao; Yue Zhao; Ding Yang; Kelin Sun; Guiyu Cheng; Juwei Mu; Qi Xue; Dali Wang; Jun Zhao; Yushun Gao; Xiangyang Liu; Dekang Fang; Jian Li; Yonggang Wang; Jinfeng Huang; Bing Wang; Liangze Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Esophageal carcinoma: prognostic differences between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Christophe Mariette; Laetitia Finzi; Guillaume Piessen; Isabelle Van Seuningen; Jean Pierre Triboulet
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  Atrial fibrillation after esophagectomy: an indicator of postoperative morbidity.

Authors:  Stanislaw P A Stawicki; Mark P Prosciak; Anthony T Gerlach; Mark Bloomston; H Tracy Davido; David E Lindsey; Mary E Dillhoff; David C Evans; Steven M Steinberg; Charles H Cook
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2011-06-15

9.  Transcervical gastric tube drainage facilitates patient mobility and reduces the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy.

Authors:  Matthew J Schuchert; Brian L Pettiford; Joshua P Landreneau; Jonathon Waxman; Arman Kilic; Ricardo S Santos; Michael S Kent; Amgad El-Sherif; Ghulam Abbas; James D Luketich; Rodney J Landreneau
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 10.  Minimally invasive surgery and cancer: controversies part 1.

Authors:  Melanie Goldfarb; Steven Brower; S D Schwaitzberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-07-02       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.