Literature DB >> 24859531

The UPF1 RNA surveillance gene is commonly mutated in pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma.

Chen Liu1, Rachid Karam2, YingQi Zhou3, Fang Su4, Yuan Ji5, Gang Li6, GuoTong Xu7, LiXia Lu7, ChongRen Wang7, MeiYi Song7, JingPing Zhu7, YiRan Wang7, YiFan Zhao7, Wai Chin Foo8, MingXin Zuo9, Mark A Valasek10, Milind Javle9, Miles F Wilkinson11, YanJun Lu7.   

Abstract

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (ASC) is an enigmatic and aggressive tumor that has a worse prognosis and higher metastatic potential than its adenocarcinoma counterpart. Here we report that ASC tumors frequently harbor somatically acquired mutations in the UPF1 gene, which encodes the core component of the nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD) pathway. These tumor-specific mutations alter UPF1 RNA splicing and perturb NMD, leading to upregulated levels of NMD substrate mRNAs. UPF1 mutations are, to our knowledge, the first known unique molecular signatures of pancreatic ASC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24859531      PMCID: PMC4048332          DOI: 10.1038/nm.3548

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


There has been little progress in understanding pancreatic ASC since these aggressive tumors were first described over a century ago[1,2]. One problem is that no mutations unique to this class of pancreatic tumors have been identified. Thus, while oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes have been shown to be altered in ASC—including K-RAS and p53—these same genes are also abnormal in other forms of pancreatic cancer[3-5]. In this communication, we report that ASC pancreatic tumors have somatic mutations in Up-frameshift 1 (UPF1), which encodes an RNA helicase essential for a highly conserved RNA degradation pathway called nonsense-mediated RNA decay (NMD)[6]. We were initially led to investigate the possibility that NMD had a role in ASC because reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis showed that an ASC tumor (TU) with wild-type p53 alleles expressed an abnormally large band that was not detectable in the adjacent normal pancreas (NP) (Supplementary Fig. 1a). Sequence analysis of this large band demonstrated that it was generated by alternatively splicing using a non-canonical splice donor in intron 6 and a non-canonical splice acceptor in intron 10, which both share 14 nt of sequence identity with the splice donor (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis demonstrated that the alternatively spliced p53 mRNA was only detectably expressed in tumor tissue, not adjacent normal tissue, while the normally spliced p53 mRNA was expressed at similar levels in the tumor and adjacent normal tissue (Supplementary Fig. 1c). The alternative splicing event creating this p53 isoform generates an in-frame premature termination codon (PTC) in intron 6 (Supplementary Fig. 1b). Because NMD degrades mRNAs with PTCs[6,7], the selective accumulation of this “alt-PTC-IVS6-p53” mRNA in the tumor tissue but not the adjacent normal tissue, raised the possibility that the tumor tissue had deficient NMD. To test this, we screened ASC tumor samples for mutations in core NMD genes. We found genomic mutations in the UPF1 gene in ASC tumors from 18 of 23 patients (see TU in Fig. 1a), whereas the 3 other NMD genes we tested—UPF2, UPF3A, and UPF3B—did not have detectable mutations (Supplementary Table 1). The UPF1 mutations were somatic in origin, since they were not present in matched normal pancreatic tissues from these 18 patients (see NP in Fig. 1a). UPF1 mutations were also not present in 50 non-ASC pancreatic and SCC lung tumors that we tested (Supplementary Table 2). Together, these results suggest that UPF1 mutations are a unique signature of ASC pancreatic tumors.
Figure 1

Somatic UPF1 mutations in ASC tumors. (a) Chromatograms of UPF1 DNA sequences from tumor (TU) and normal adjacent pancreatic tissue (NP). A total of 36 single-base substitutions in genomic UPF1 DNA were found in the tumors; each patient had between one to five point mutations. All NP samples had wild-type UPF1 sequences, indicating mutations were somatic in origin. (b) Top: schematic of UPF1 protein domains. Bottom: the type and location of mutations found in the two regions of UPF1 that harbored mutations. ESEs and ISEs are exonic and intronic splicing enhancers, respectively (sequences are provided on Supplementary Figure 2).

The point mutations in the ASC tumors clustered in two regions of the UPF1 gene (Fig. 1b). Surprisingly, these mutations were nearly equally distributed in the exons and introns in these two regions. This raised the possibility that they alter UPF1 splicing by disrupting intronic splicing enhancers (ISEs) and exonic splicing enhancers (ESEs), which are essential for the inclusion of a subset of exons during splicing[8,9]. In support of this, a subset of the mutations in the ASC tumors disrupted predicted ESEs/ISEs (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 2). To directly test whether the ASC mutations disrupt UPF1 splicing, we generated UPF1 mini-gene constructs corresponding to the two regions mutated in ASC tumors (Fig. 2a,b). We then introduced, by site-specific mutagenesis, the mutations found in 15 of the patients. Transfection analysis showed that the wild-type versions of the two mini-gene constructs expressed normally spliced mRNA that included all exons, as determined by direct sequencing of the bands generated by RT-PCR (Fig. 2c,d). No other bands were detected, indicating that most of the mature mRNA generated by these mini-gene constructs was normally spliced. In contrast, all 15 mutant mini-genes expressed alternatively spliced transcripts (Fig. 2,d). While none of the patient’s mutations completely eliminated normal splicing, the ratio of alternatively spliced-to-normally spliced mRNA was 10 to 1 or higher in many cases. As confirmation, analysis of endogenous UPF1 splicing in 2 of 2 frozen tumor samples revealed an alternatively spliced UPF1 mRNA that was not present in the adjacent normal tissue (Fig. 2e). We conclude that ASC-specific mutations in the UPF1 gene trigger alternative splicing of UPF1 pre-mRNA.
Figure 2

ASC-specific UPF1 mutations trigger alternative UPF1 RNA splicing. (a) The indicated region of human UPF1 (nt 22,779-23,570, RefSeq accession number NC_000019.9) was cloned into the NdeI site of the pTBNde mini-gene construct. All mutations were generated by site-directed mutagenesis to match those in the indicated patient’s tumors. (b) The indicated region of human UPF1 (nt 33,138-34,490) was cloned and mutated as described in panel a. (c) RT-PCR analysis of HEK293 cells transfected with the constructs shown in panel a (primer locations are indicated by the arrows). Direct sequencing of the large (792 nt) and small (239 nt) bands indicated that they correspond to normally spliced and exon-skipped transcripts, respectively. The numbers below the gel are the average values from five independent transfections. (d) RT-PCR analysis performed as in panel c. Direct sequencing of the bands in the gel indicated they were derived from mRNA spliced in the manner shown in the schematic. The bands corresponding to normally spliced, alt 1, and alt 2 mRNA had lengths of 742, 1117, and 619 nt, respectively. The numbers below the gel are the average values from five independent transfections. (e) RT-PCR analysis of normal pancreas (NP) and ASC frozen samples (TU) from patients 15 and 16. RT-PCR sequencing results are indicated as schematics next to the gels. (f) Immunohistochemical analysis of UPF1 staining in ASC tumor samples from patient 15. Tumor (T) and normal tissue (NT) are indicated. Bottom panel shows H & E staining, with arrows pointing to the adenocarinoma component in this ASC tumor. The scale bar represents 200 micrometers on each picture.

The UPF1 alternative splicing events caused by mutations in the exon 10/11 region eliminate a portion of UPF1’s RNA helicase domain essential for UPF1 function[6], while mutations in the exon 21/23 region truncate the carboxy-terminal region of UPF1, which contains [S/T]Q motifs phosphorylated by SMG1, a serine/threonine kinase required for NMD[10] (Figs. 1b and 2c). Given that essential UPF1 domains are lost, these mutant forms of UPF1 are likely to have lost their function or have dominant-negative activity. In the case of the latter, inhibited NMD would be predicted to occur when only one UPF1 allele is mutated. In support of this possibility, mutations in various regions of UPF1 have previously been shown to confer dominant-negative activity[11-13]. With regard to the former, we found that at least one ASC tumor (from patient 22) had mutations in both UPF1 alleles. Several other ASC tumors have multiple UPF1 mutations (Supplementary Table 1), consistent with some of them also having mutations in both UPF1 alleles. In further support of this notion, we observed little or no UPF1 expression in many ASC tumors compared to adjacent normal tissue, as demonstrated by immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis (Fig. 2f and Supplementary Table 1). As direct evidence that NMD is inhibited in ASC tumors, we found that the NMD substrates, ATF3 and MAP3K14 mRNA[14], were dramatically upregulated in tumor tissue relative to adjacent normal tissue (Supplementary Fig. 3). Since perturbation of NMD is known to dysregulate ~3 to 10% of mRNAs in a variety of cell lines and organisms[6,14,15], it is likely this will also be the case of ASC tumors, which could shift the balance towards a more malignant phenotype[16,17]. One candidate NMD substrate that could serve in this capacity is the alternatively spliced p53 transcript—alt-PTC-IVS6-p53—that we identified above (Supplementary Fig. 1), as we found it encoded a protein with dominant-negative activity (Supplementary Fig. 4). The discovery of mutations in the UPF1 gene in ASC tumors represents the first known example of genetic alterations in a NMD gene in human tumors. To our knowledge, UPF1 is also the first gene known to be selectively mutated in pancreatic ASC tumors. Other genes mutated in these tumors, including p53 and K-RAS (see Supplementary Fig. 5 and Supplementary Table 1) are also mutated in other pancreatic tumor types[4,5]. We note that it is possible that UPF1 mutations in ASC tumors have broad disruptive effects that that extend beyond NMD, including Staufen-mediated RNA decay[18]. Our finding that UPF1 is selectively mutated in pancreatic ASC suggests that this feature will be useful for diagnosis of this type of tumor and also raises the possibility that ASC patients can benefit from therapy designed to target NMD substrates[19,20].

METHODS

Methods are available in the Supplementary Information section.
  20 in total

1.  Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: a clinicopathologic series of 25 cases.

Authors:  D E Kardon; L D Thompson; R M Przygodzki; C S Heffess
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 2.  Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: molecular insights and mechanistic variations across species.

Authors:  Elena Conti; Elisa Izaurralde
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 8.382

Review 3.  The nonsense-mediated decay RNA surveillance pathway.

Authors:  Yao-Fu Chang; J Saadi Imam; Miles F Wilkinson
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 23.643

Review 4.  Searching for splicing motifs.

Authors:  Lawrence A Chasin
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Upf1 phosphorylation triggers translational repression during nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.

Authors:  Olaf Isken; Yoon Ki Kim; Nao Hosoda; Greg L Mayeur; John W B Hershey; Lynne E Maquat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas.

Authors:  J A Madura; B T Jarman; M G Doherty; M N Yum; T J Howard
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1999-06

7.  Gene products that promote mRNA turnover in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  P Leeds; J M Wood; B S Lee; M R Culbertson
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  A mutated human homologue to yeast Upf1 protein has a dominant-negative effect on the decay of nonsense-containing mRNAs in mammalian cells.

Authors:  X Sun; H A Perlick; H C Dietz; L E Maquat
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-18       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Nonsense surveillance regulates expression of diverse classes of mammalian transcripts and mutes genomic noise.

Authors:  Joshua T Mendell; Neda A Sharifi; Jennifer L Meyers; Francisco Martinez-Murillo; Harry C Dietz
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2004-09-26       Impact factor: 38.330

10.  Regulation of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay: implications for physiology and disease.

Authors:  Rachid Karam; Jordan Wengrod; Lawrence B Gardner; Miles F Wilkinson
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-13
View more
  62 in total

1.  Frameshift Mutations of SMG7 Essential for Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Gastric and Colorectal Cancers.

Authors:  Yun Sol Jo; Sang Yong Song; Min Sung Kim; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2016-10-22       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 2.  Stress and the nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway.

Authors:  Alexandra E Goetz; Miles Wilkinson
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  The RNA Surveillance Factor UPF1 Represses Myogenesis via Its E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Activity.

Authors:  Qing Feng; Sujatha Jagannathan; Robert K Bradley
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 4.  Physiological and pathophysiological role of nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.

Authors:  Franziska Ottens; Niels H Gehring
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 3.657

Review 5.  Nonsense-mediated mRNA Decay and Cancer.

Authors:  Maximilian W Popp; Lynne E Maquat
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 6.  Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay: Degradation of Defective Transcripts Is Only Part of the Story.

Authors:  Feng He; Allan Jacobson
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  2015-10-02       Impact factor: 16.830

Review 7.  RNA Decay Factor UPF1 Promotes Protein Decay: A Hidden Talent.

Authors:  Terra-Dawn M Plank; Miles F Wilkinson
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2017-12-13       Impact factor: 4.345

Review 8.  Upf proteins: highly conserved factors involved in nonsense mRNA mediated decay.

Authors:  Puneet Gupta; Yan-Ruide Li
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 9.  Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas: Molecular characterization of 23 patients along with a literature review.

Authors:  Erkut Borazanci; Sherri Z Millis; Ron Korn; Haiyong Han; Clifford J Whatcott; Zoran Gatalica; Michael T Barrett; Derek Cridebring; Daniel D Von Hoff
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-09-15

10.  The nonsense-mediated RNA decay pathway is disrupted in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors.

Authors:  JingWei Lu; Terra-Dawn Plank; Fang Su; XiuJuan Shi; Chen Liu; Yuan Ji; ShuaiJun Li; Andrew Huynh; Chao Shi; Bo Zhu; Guang Yang; YanMing Wu; Miles F Wilkinson; YanJun Lu
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.