| Literature DB >> 24858495 |
Te-Fu Chan1, Wei-Ting Lin2, Hsiao-Ling Huang3, Chun-Ying Lee4, Pei-Wen Wu5, Yu-Wen Chiu6, Chun-Chi Huang7, Sharon Tsai8, Chih-Lung Lin9, Chien-Hung Lee10.
Abstract
Sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) are the principle source of added sugar in diets. Cardiometabolic disturbances can occur from early childhood to adulthood. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to examine the gender-specific association of SSB intake with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and its components among adolescents in Taiwan. A total of 2727 adolescents aged 12 to 16 years randomly selected from three diverse economic areas in Southern Taiwan by using a multistage-sampling strategy participated in this study. Demographic, dietary, physical and anthropometric parameters were measured, and serum lipid profiles and glucose levels were determined. The International Diabetes Federation (IDF) specifies that MetS requires abdominal obesity and ≥2 abnormal components, and Cook criteria for MetS require ≥3 abnormal components. We applied survey-data modules to data analyses, and used multiple regression and logistic models to adjust for covariates. An increased SSB intake was linked to a greater waist circumference in both sexes and to systolic blood pressure in boys (P for trend: ≤0.043). Male moderate and high consuming SSB drinkers exhibited triglyceride levels that were 8.0 and 8.2 mg/dL significantly higher, respectively, than those of nondrinkers. Compared with nondrinkers, boys who consumed >500 mL/day (high quantity) of SSBs exhibited 10.3-fold (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 1.2-90.2) and 5.1-fold (95% CIs: 1.01-25.5) risks of contracting MetS, as defined by the IDF and Cook criteria for MetS, respectively. In girls, the risk estimates for the same comparison were not significant by the IDF criteria (6.5-fold risk, 95% CIs: 0.9-∞) or Cook criteria (5.9-fold risk, 95% CIs: 0.8-43.8) for MetS. High SSB consumption was also linked to 1.9-fold (95% CIs: 1.1-3.1) and 2.7-fold (95% CIs: 1.3-5.7) higher risks of being at a greater overall metabolic risk in girls and boys, respectively. In conclusion, a high SSB intake is associated with adolescent MetS among boys but not girls in Taiwan.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2014 PMID: 24858495 PMCID: PMC4042561 DOI: 10.3390/nu6052088
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Distributions of demographic factors, physical activity and energy intake associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (mL/day) among adolescents in Taiwan.
| Factors | Girls | Boys | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonintake | 1–500 | >500 | Nonintake | 1-500 | >500 | |||
| 196 | 961 | 242 | 120 | 802 | 406 | |||
| 15.6 | 65.9 | 18.5 | 8.8 | 59.1 | 32.1 | |||
| 13.6 ± 0.1 | 13.5 ± 0.1 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 0.574 | 13.6 ± 0.1 | 13.5 ± 0.1 | 13.7 ± 0.1 | 0.058 | |
| Kaohsiung city | 19.4 | 63.2 | 17.4 | 0.033 | 9.3 | 57.8 | 32.9 | 0.746 |
| Pingtung county | 10.6 | 68.3 | 21.2 | 7.7 | 60.6 | 31.7 | ||
| Taitung county | 11.0 | 74.2 | 14.8 | 9.2 | 62.8 | 28.0 | ||
| <952.4 | 16.1 | 63.1 | 20.8 | 0.324 | 9.4 | 54.8 | 35.8 | 0.106 |
| 952.5–2140.4 | 16.7 | 68.0 | 15.3 | 11.5 | 55.8 | 32.7 | ||
| ≥2140.5 | 12.0 | 65.9 | 22.1 | 6.0 | 63.9 | 30.1 | ||
| 1835.3 ± 61.3 | 1903.4 ± 29.9 | 2044.8 ± 45.3 | <0.001 | 2083.7 ± 60.8 | 2151.5 ± 39.9 | 2448.2 ± 67.2 | <0.001 | |
1 Raw number of study samples (the number that is not adjusted for sample survey design); 2 Data was presented adjusted for sample weight and complex sample design; 3p for associations between sugar-sweetened beverage consumption and the factors investigated.
Multivariate-adjusted means (aMean) 1,2 and regression coefficients (adj. β) 1,3 of cardiometabolic risk factors associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (mL/day) among adolescents in Taiwan.
| Factors | Girls | Boys | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nonintake | 1–500 | >500 | Nonintake | 1–500 | >500 | |||||||||||||
| aMean | SE | aMean | SE | aMean | SE | adj. β | SE | aMean | SE | aMean | SE | aMean | SE | adj. β | SE | |||
| 68.0 | 0.9 | 69.4 | 0.7 | 71.1 * | 0.8 | 1.5 | 0.6 | 0.011 | 72.6 | 0.9 | 75.0 * | 0.6 | 76.3 * | 0.9 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.039 | |
| 58.8 | 1.3 | 59.0 | 1.2 | 57.6 | 1.6 | −0.6 | 0.9 | 0.528 | 56.0 | 1.3 | 56.3 | 0.7 | 54.9 | 1.6 | −0.9 | 1.0 | 0.401 | |
| 74.4 | 2.3 | 76.0 | 1.9 | 79.3 | 3.2 | 2.5 | 1.7 | 0.160 | 70.4 | 3.2 | 78.4 * | 1.6 | 78.6 * | 2.8 | 2.6 | 2.4 | 0.278 | |
| 89.1 | 0.9 | 89.6 | 0.7 | 90.6 | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.5 | 0.119 | 92.1 | 1.0 | 93.1 | 0.6 | 91.4 | 1.0 | −0.9 | 0.6 | 0.167 | |
| 106.2 | 1.3 | 106.5 | 0.6 | 107.7 | 1.2 | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.174 | 111.9 | 1.3 | 112.2 | 0.9 | 114.3 | 0.6 | 1.6 | 0.7 | 0.043 | |
| 65.2 | 0.8 | 64.5 | 0.3 | 65.3 | 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.890 | 65.5 | 1.1 | 65.3 | 0.6 | 65.1 | 0.6 | −0.2 | 0.6 | 0.753 | |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 161.1 | 3.9 | 164.2 | 2.4 | 166.1 | 3.7 | 2.5 | 2.2 | 0.274 | 154.2 | 2.4 | 158.1 | 1.5 | 156.5 | 4.4 | 0.1 | 2.8 | 0.984 |
| Hip circumference, cm | 89.8 | 0.6 | 90.1 | 0.4 | 92.3 * | 0.7 | 1.3 | 0.4 | 0.007 | 90.2 | 0.8 | 91.7 | 0.5 | 93.8 * | 0.7 | 2.0 | 0.6 | 0.002 |
| Body fat, % | 26.1 | 0.5 | 26.7 | 0.3 | 28.5 * | 0.5 | 1.2 | 0.4 | 0.005 | 17.7 | 1.0 | 19.8 * | 0.5 | 20.8 * | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.6 | 0.030 |
| Body adiposity index, % | 27.6 | 0.3 | 27.9 | 0.2 | 29.1 * | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.001 | 24.9 | 0.4 | 26.2 * | 0.2 | 26.7 * | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.005 |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 20.3 | 0.3 | 20.7 | 0.2 | 21.5 * | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.2 | 0.007 | 21.0 | 0.4 | 22.0 * | 0.2 | 22.7 * | 0.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.009 |
Abbreviations: * p < 0.05; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; adj., adjusted. 1 Models were adjusted for study area, age, physical activity, total calories, the intake of meat, fruit, fried food, food with jelly/honey, alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking; 2 Adjusted mean displays the estimated prediction when the covariates were set as mean values; 3 Adjused regression coefficients were estimated for a linear dose-response effect of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption.
Prevalence rates and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 1 of metabolic syndrome (MetS) defined by IDF and Cook criteria associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (mL/day) among adolescents in Taiwan.
| Factors | Girls | Boys | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence, % | 1–500 | >500 | Prevalence, % | 1–500 | >500 | |||||||||||
| NI | 1–500 | >500 | aOR | (95% CI) | aOR | (95% CI) | NI | 1–500 | >500 | aOR | (95% CI) | aOR | (95% CI) | |||
| Large WC | 8.2 | 13.4 | 22.7 | 2.0 | (0.99–3.9) | 4.1 | (1.9–8.8) | <0.001 | 7.4 | 12.1 | 18.7 | 2.0 | (0.8–5.1) | 3.0 | (1.2–7.6) | 0.011 |
| Low HDL-C | 5.2 | 9.1 | 11.2 | 1.8 | (0.8–4.4) | 2.1 | (0.7–6.7) | 0.194 | 4.3 | 9.5 | 13.5 | 2.4 | (0.7–8.1) | 3.9 | (0.9–16.4) | 0.067 |
| Elevated TG | 2.3 | 4.0 | 4.6 | 1.9 | (0.8–4.4) | 2.1 | (0.7–6.8) | 0.197 | 3.9 | 5.5 | 7.1 | 1.3 | (0.5–3.7) | 1.7 | (0.6–5.1) | 0.289 |
| Increased FPG | 9.0 | 10.8 | 11.8 | 1.3 | (0.6–2.5) | 1.5 | (0.9–2.4) | 0.203 | 17.2 | 19.4 | 17.3 | 1.2 | (0.6–2.4) | 1.1 | (0.6–2.2) | 0.908 |
| High BP | 3.6 | 4.3 | 4.9 | 1.2 | (0.3–4.3) | 1.5 | (0.5–5.2) | 0.423 | 12.9 | 10.8 | 15.5 | 0.8 | (0.3–2.3) | 1.2 | (0.5–3.1) | 0.244 |
| Component (c) no. | ||||||||||||||||
| 1c | 21.8 | 29.6 | 27.7 | 23.2 | 26.6 | 27.8 | ||||||||||
| 2c | ||||||||||||||||
| 3c | ||||||||||||||||
| Large WC | 6.1 | 10.7 | 10.5 | 2.1 | (1.0–4.4) | 2.3 | (1.1–4.8) | 0.014 | 5.9 | 9.7 | 14.7 | 2.1 | (0.9–5.0) | 3.1 | (1.4–6.9) | 0.008 |
| Low HDL-C | 5.2 | 9.1 | 11.3 | 1.8 | (0.8–4.4) | 2.2 | (0.7–6.7) | 0.184 | 4.9 | 9.5 | 13.5 | 2.1 | (0.7–6.7) | 3.4 | (0.8–14.0) | 0.083 |
| Elevated TG | 9.2 | 12.9 | 15.0 | 1.6 | (0.9–2.9) | 1.9 | (0.96–3.7) | 0.065 | 9.7 | 16.3 | 18.9 | 1.9 | (0.9–4.0) | 2.3 | (1.1–5.0) | 0.045 |
| High FPG | 1.4 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.9 | (0.7–4.9) | 1.6 | (0.2–10.8) | 0.690 | 0.0 | 1.9 | 1.5 | 3.6 2 | (0.6–-∞) | 2.0 2 | (0.3–∞) | 1.000 2 |
| Raised BP | 12.5 | 16.2 | 23.0 | 1.3 | (0.8–2.1) | 2.1 | (1.3–3.7) | 0.015 | 18.0 | 17.3 | 22.0 | 0.9 | (0.4–1.9) | 1.2 | (0.6–2.6) | 0.266 |
| Component (c) no. | ||||||||||||||||
| 1c | 22.5 | 29.1 | 21.1 | 26.6 | 24.8 | 31.5 | ||||||||||
| 2c | ||||||||||||||||
| 3c | ||||||||||||||||
Abbreviations: NI, nonintake; IDF, International Diabetes Federation; WC, waist circumference; HDL-C, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TG, triglyceride; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; BP, blood pressure; 1 ORs were adjusted for study area, age, physical activity, total calories, the intake of meat, fruit, fried food, food with jelly/honey, alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking; 2 ORs were calculated using the median unbiased estimates with the aid of exact logistic regression.
Figure 1Adjusted (adj.) mean and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of metabolic syndrome components associated with low (L), median (M) and high (H) metabolic risk clusters in girls (A) and in boys (B).
Prevalence rates and adjusted odds ratios (aOR) 1 of high metabolic risk cluster associated with sugar-sweetened beverage consumption (mL/day) among adolescents in Taiwan.
| Factors | Girls | Boys | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prevalence, % | 1–500 | >500 | Prevalence, % | 1–500 | >500 | |||||||||||
| NI | 1–500 | >500 | aOR | (95% CI) | aOR | (95% CI) | NI | 1–500 | >500 | aOR | (95% CI) | aOR | (95% CI) | |||
| Low | 35.2 | 34.7 | 33.5 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 42.8 | 43.6 | 37.1 | 1.0 | 1.0 | ||||||
| Median | 42.0 | 38.5 | 34.5 | 1.2 | (0.8–1.8) | 1.2 | (0.7–2.2) | 0.433 | 47.4 | 36.6 | 40.9 | 0.8 | (0.5–1.3) | 1.0 | (0.6–1.6) | 0.530 |
| High | 22.8 | 26.9 | 32.1 | 1.4 | (0.9–2.3) | 1.9 | (1.1–3.1) | 0.020 | 9.8 | 19.8 | 22.1 | 2.2 | (1.0–4.8) | 2.7 | (1.3–5.7) | 0.038 |
Abbreviations: NI, nonintake; 1 ORs were adjusted for study area, age, physical activity, total calories, the intake of meat, fruit, fried food, food with jelly/honey, alcohol drinking and cigarette smoking; risk cluster groups were derived from a two-step cluster analysis.