Literature DB >> 29751193

Adolescents perceive a low added sugar adequate fiber diet to be more satiating and equally palatable compared to a high added sugar low fiber diet in a randomized-crossover design controlled feeding pilot trial.

Tanya M Halliday1, Sarah V Liu2, Lori B Moore3, Valisa E Hedrick4, Brenda M Davy5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: High added sugar (AS) intake is associated with obesity and poor diet quality. Guidelines recommended limiting AS to 5-10% of total energy intake, but palatability and feasibility of this AS intake level is uncertain.
OBJECTIVE: To compare adolescents' perceptions of hunger, fullness, and palatability in response to a low AS adequate fiber (LASAF; 5% total energy from AS and 13.5 g fiber/1000 kcal) and a high AS low fiber (HASLF; 25% total energy form AS and 8.2 g/1000 kcal) diet.
DESIGN: Adolescents (n = 32, age: 15.3 ± 1.6 yrs., BMI percentile: 47 ± 4, 15 male) completed a randomized, crossover, controlled feeding study. Participants consumed calorie-matched LASAF and HASLF diets for 7 days, separated by a 4 week washout. Body weight was monitored daily on each diet. Hunger, fullness, and palatability were assessed via 100 mm visual analogue scales at the end of each feeding period. Differences were assessed with paired sample t-tests. Data are expressed as mean ± SD.
RESULTS: Participants remained weight stable, and no difference in weight change between diet conditions was detected (LASAF: -0.06 ± 0.7 vs. HASLF: -0.02 ± 0.6 kg, p = 0.751). Less hunger (LASAF: 24.1 ± 14.6 vs. HASLF: 32.1 ± 17.6 mm, p = 0.024) and greater fullness (LASAF: 70.2 ± 12.3 vs. HASLF: 61.3 ± 18.1 mm, p = 0.006) were reported on the LASAF compared to the HASLF. Participants reported the diets to be equally palatable (LASAF: 39.6 ± 12.9 vs. HASLF: 37.2 ± 17.8 mm, p = 0.440).
CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents perceive a LASAF diet to be as palatable as a HASLF diet, but more satiating. LASAF diets should be investigated as a strategy for weight control in adolescents.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Added sugar; Appetite; Dietary guidelines; Fiber; Weight management adolescents

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29751193      PMCID: PMC6047920          DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  31 in total

1.  Food sources of added sweeteners in the diets of Americans.

Authors:  J F Guthrie; J F Morton
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2000-01

2.  Reducing added sugars in the food supply through a cap-and-trade approach.

Authors:  Sanjay Basu; Kristina Lewis
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Decreasing dislike for sour and bitter in children and adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth D Capaldi; Gregory J Privitera
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.868

4.  A randomized trial of sugar-sweetened beverages and adolescent body weight.

Authors:  Cara B Ebbeling; Henry A Feldman; Virginia R Chomitz; Tracy A Antonelli; Steven L Gortmaker; Stavroula K Osganian; David S Ludwig
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Saccharin pre-exposure enhances appetitive flavor learning in pre-weanling rats.

Authors:  Susan E Swithers; Sean B Ogden; Alycia F Laboy; T L Davidson
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-05-21       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Dietary sources of energy, solid fats, and added sugars among children and adolescents in the United States.

Authors:  Jill Reedy; Susan M Krebs-Smith
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-10

7.  Masking Vegetable Bitterness to Improve Palatability Depends on Vegetable Type and Taste Phenotype.

Authors:  Mastaneh Sharafi; John E Hayes; Valerie B Duffy
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  The impact of sugar sweetened beverage intake on hunger and satiety in minority adolescents.

Authors:  Grace E Shearrer; Gillian A O'Reilly; Britini R Belcher; Michael J Daniels; Michael I Goran; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-12-01       Impact factor: 3.868

9.  Effect of sugars in solutions on subjective appetite and short-term food intake in 9- to 14-year-old normal weight boys.

Authors:  M Van Engelen; S Khodabandeh; T Akhavan; J Agarwal; B Gladanac; N Bellissimo
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.016

Review 10.  Appetite and energy balancing.

Authors:  Peter J Rogers; Jeffrey M Brunstrom
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2016-04-06
View more
  1 in total

1.  Estimating individualized treatment regimes from crossover designs.

Authors:  Crystal T Nguyen; Daniel J Luckett; Anna R Kahkoska; Grace E Shearrer; Donna Spruijt-Metz; Jaimie N Davis; Michael R Kosorok
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 2.571

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.