| Literature DB >> 24855492 |
Daisuke Uritani1, Takahiko Fukumoto1, Daisuke Matsumoto1, Masayuki Shima2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: No standardised method has been adopted for measuring toe-grip strength (TGS), and no reference values have been established for evaluating it. The present study investigated age-related changes in TGS and the association of TGS with various descriptive characteristics.Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Flexor strength; Foot; Movement; Muscle degeneration; Physical function; Sex
Year: 2014 PMID: 24855492 PMCID: PMC4030447 DOI: 10.1186/1757-1146-7-28
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Foot Ankle Res ISSN: 1757-1146 Impact factor: 2.303
Figure 1Test of toe grip strength. The first proximal phalanx is positioned at the grip bar, and the movable heel stopper is adjusted to fit the heel.
Characteristics of participants by decade and sex
| 20s | | | | |
| Man | 69 | 23.9 (3.0) | 171.0 (5.8) | 65.1 (8.6) |
| Woman | 57 | 23.5 (2.8) | 159.1 (4.7) | 52.9 (8.0) |
| 30s | | | | |
| Man | 72 | 35.0 (2.9) | 171.4 (6.0) | 67.5 (9.8) |
| Woman | 62 | 36.0 (2.6) | 158.7 (6.2) | 52.6 (7.7) |
| 40s | | | | |
| Man | 101 | 44.1 (2.8) | 170.5 (4.8) | 68.3 (9.4) |
| Woman | 155 | 44.9 (2.9) | 157.8 (5.4) | 53.6 (8.0) |
| 50s | | | | |
| Man | 83 | 54.4 (3.1) | 168.6 (5.1) | 65.8 (9.8) |
| Woman | 234 | 54.7 (2.9) | 155.9 (5.4) | 52.3 (8.9) |
| 60s | | | | |
| Man | 177 | 64.7 (2.8) | 166.0 (5.9) | 63.3 (9.4) |
| Woman | 493 | 64.4 (2.8) | 152.7 (5.1) | 51.7 (7.5) |
| 70s | | | | |
| Man | 116 | 72.4 (2.3) | 164.9 (4.9) | 63.2 (7.8) |
| Woman | 223 | 72.6 (2.4) | 150.5 (5.4) | 50.6 (7.6) |
Age, height and weight are expressed as means (SD).
Correlation coefficients for TGS between dominant and non-dominant side
| Men | 0.89 | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.90 | 0.87 | 0.85 | 0.73 |
| Women | 0.90 | 0.86 | 0.88 | 0.89 | 0.91 | 0.90 | 0.90 |
TGS, toe grip strength. All correlations significant at p < 0.01.
Mean toe grip strength and mean toe grip strength/weight
| 20s | 16.9 (6.0)† | 10.4 (4.1) | 26.5(10.2)† | 20.0 (7.9) |
| 30s | 17.1 (5.0)† | 11.5 (4.9) | 25.7 (7.8)* | 22.1 (9.4) |
| 40s | 15.8 (6.2) † | 11.6 (4.5) | 23.4 (9.0) | 21.8 (8.0) |
| 50s | 14.4 (4.8)†b | 8.9 (3.6)BC | 22.2 (7.8)† | 17.3 (6.9)BC |
| 60s | 12.0 (4.5)†ABCD | 8.9 (4.0)BC | 19.3 (7.5)*ABC | 17.5 (8.2)BC |
| 70s | 10.4 (3.3)†ABCDE | 7.3 (3.6)ABCDE | 16.5 (5.1)†ABCDE | 14.6 (7.4)ABCDE |
Data expressed as means (standard deviation). TGS, toe grip strength; Wt, Weight.
*p < 0.05 and †p < 0.01 vs. women. p < 0.01: A, B, C, D, E vs. 20s, 30s, 40s, 50s and 60s, respectively; bp < 0.05 vs. 30s.
Correlation coefficients between mean TGS and age, height and weight
| TGS | Men | −0.43 | 0.33 | 0.19 |
| Women | −0.28 | 0.31 | 0.16 | |
TGS, toe grip strength; all correlations significant at p < 0.01.
Multiple regression analysis of toe grip strength
| Intercept | −6.26 | 3.40 | | 0.07 |
| Age (y) | −0.09 | 0.01 | −0.24 | p < 0.01 |
| Sex (M,0; F,1) | −1.86 | 0.33 | −0.17 | p < 0.01 |
| Height (cm) | 0.13 | 0.02 | 0.23 | p < 0.01 |
| Weight (kg) | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.08 | p < 0.01 |
R = 0.56, adjusted R2 = 0.31.