Literature DB >> 11461053

A comparison of the anthropometric, strength, endurance and flexibility characteristics of female elite and recreational climbers and non-climbers.

S Grant1, T Hasler, C Davies, T C Aitchison, J Wilson, A Whittaker.   

Abstract

There is limited information on the anthropometry, strength, endurance and flexibility of female rock climbers. The aim of this study was to compare these characteristics in three groups of females: Group 1 comprised 10 elite climbers aged 31.3 +/- 5.0 years (mean +/- s) who had led to a standard of 'hard very severe'; Group 2 consisted of 10 recreational climbers aged 24.1 +/- 4.0 years who had led to a standard of 'severe'; and Group 3 comprised 10 physically active individuals aged 28.5 +/- 5.0 years who had not previously rock-climbed. The tests included finger strength (grip strength, finger strength measured on climbing-specific apparatus), flexibility, bent arm hang and pull-ups. Regression procedures (analysis of covariance) were used to examine the influence of body mass, leg length, height and age. For finger strength, the elite climbers recorded significantly higher values (P < 0.05) than the recreational climbers and non-climbers (four fingers, right hand: elite 321 +/- 18 N, recreational 251 +/- 14 N, non-climbers 256 +/- 15 N; four fingers, left hand: elite 307 +/- 14 N, recreational 248 +/- 12 N, non-climbers 243 +/- 11 N). For grip strength of the right hand, the elite climbers recorded significantly higher values than the recreational climbers only (elite 338 +/- 12 N, recreational 289 +/- 10 N, non-climbers 307 +/- 11 N). The results suggest that elite climbers have greater finger strength than recreational climbers and non-climbers.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11461053     DOI: 10.1080/026404101750238953

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  28 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of sport rock climbing.

Authors:  A W Sheel
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Physiology of difficult rock climbing.

Authors:  Phillip B Watts
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  Physiological responses to rock climbing in young climbers.

Authors:  Audry Birute Morrison; Volker Rainer Schöffl
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 13.800

4.  Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing.

Authors:  Rômulo Cássio de Moraes Bertuzzi; Emerson Franchini; Eduardo Kokubun; Maria Augusta Peduti Dal Molin Kiss
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  The physiology of rock climbing.

Authors:  Luisa V Giles; Edward C Rhodes; Jack E Taunton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  The Case for Retiring Flexibility as a Major Component of Physical Fitness.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Climbing-specific finger flexor performance and forearm muscle oxygenation in elite male and female sport climbers.

Authors:  Marc Philippe; Daniel Wegst; Tom Müller; Christian Raschner; Martin Burtscher
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The influence of sampling site and assay method on lactate concentration in response to rock climbing.

Authors:  Nick Draper; Simon Brent; Beverley Hale; Ian Coleman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2006-09-08       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Climbing time to exhaustion is a determinant of climbing performance in high-level sport climbers.

Authors:  Vanesa España-Romero; Francisco B Ortega Porcel; Enrique G Artero; David Jiménez-Pavón; Angel Gutiérrez Sainz; Manuel J Castillo Garzón; Jonatan R Ruiz
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-08-14       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effects of Two vs. Four Weekly Campus Board Training Sessions on Bouldering Performance and Climbing-Specific Tests in Advanced and Elite Climbers.

Authors:  Nicolay Stien; Helene Pedersen; Vegard A Vereide; Atle H Saeterbakken; Espen Hermans; Jarle Kalland; Brad J Schoenfeld; Vidar Andersen
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.988

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.