| Literature DB >> 25972928 |
Daisuke Uritani1, Takahiko Fukumoto1, Daisuke Matsumoto1, Masayuki Shima2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The associations between toe grip strength (TGS) and foot structure are not well known, although foot structure is inferred to affect TGS. This study investigated the associations between TGS and hallux valgus angle (HVA), toe curl ability, and foot arch height (FAH).Entities:
Keywords: Aging; Foot; Hallux valgus; Muscle strength; Range of motion; Sex; Toes
Year: 2015 PMID: 25972928 PMCID: PMC4430032 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-015-0076-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Foot Ankle Res ISSN: 1757-1146 Impact factor: 2.303
Figure 1Foot characteristic measurements. a, foot length; b, flexed foot length was measured as the length from the heel to the tip of the hallux with maximal toe flexion; c, truncated foot length was measured as the length between the first metatarsal head and heel; d, navicular height was measured as the length from the floor to the top of the navicular tuberosity.
Participant characteristics
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| (N=227) | (N=49) | (N=178) | |
| Age group (years) | |||
| 20 to 29 | 16 | 6 | 10 |
| 30 to 39 | 9 | 4 | 5 |
| 40 to 49 | 11 | 3 | 8 |
| 50 to 59 | 19 | 5 | 14 |
| 60 to 69 | 107 | 17 | 90 |
| 70 to 79 | 65 | 14 | 51 |
| Age (years) | 61.0 (14.2) | 56.7 (17.1) | 62.2 (13.0) |
| Height (cm) | 156.1 (8.4) | 167.2 (6.0) | 153.1 (6.2) |
| Weight (kg) | 53.6 (8.9) | 62.0 (8.4) | 51.3 (7.6) |
Data are presented as numbers or mean (SD).
Toe grip strength (TGS) and foot structure characteristics
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TGS (kg) | 13.2 (5.6) | 17.6 (6.0) | 12.4 (5.3) | < 0.001 |
| Foot length (cm) | 22.7 (1.1) | 24.6 (0.3) | 22.3 (0.8) | < 0.001 |
| Flexed foot length (cm) | 19.8 (1.0) | 21.5 (0.4) | 19.5 (0.8) | < 0.001 |
| Truncated foot length (cm) | 17.2 (1.0) | 18.4 (0.8) | 17.0 (0.8) | < 0.001 |
| Navicular height (cm) | 4.8 (0.6) | 5.1 (0.7) | 4.7 (0.5) | < 0.001 |
| HVA (°) | 18.8 (7.5) | 16.3 (2.3) | 19.3 (8.0) | 0.065 |
| Toe curl ability (%) | 12.5 (4.4) | 12.6 (1.0) | 12.5 (4.7) | 0.683 |
| FAH (%) | 27.8 (3.3) | 27.8 (4.2) | 27.8 (3.2) | 0.709 |
All data are expressed as mean (SD).
HVA, Hallux valgus angle; Toe curl ability (foot length – flexed foot length)/foot length; FAH, Foot arch height, Navicular height/base of arch.
Correlation coefficients between toe grip strength and other factors, according to sex
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Men | −0.43** | 0.32* | 0.26 | 0.07 | 0.39** | −0.33* |
| Women | −0.56** | 0.40** | 0.12 | −0.08 | 0.44** | 0.04 |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.
HVA, Hallux valgus angle; FAH, Foot arch height.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis of toe grip strength in men
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | 21.585 | 4.559 | < 0.001 | |
| Age (years) | −0.136 | 0.054 | −0.339 | 0.015 |
| Toe curl ability (%) | 0.417 | 0.199 | 0.282 | 0.042 |
Explanatory variables were age, height, toe curl ability, and FAH.
β: standardised partial regression coefficient.
Adjusted R2=0.224.
Stepwise multiple regression analysis of toe grip strength in women
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercept | −1.568 | 8.974 | 0.861 | |
| Age (years) | −0.155 | 0.026 | −0.397 | < 0.001 |
| Height (cm) | 0.138 | 0.054 | 0.167 | 0.011 |
| Toe curl ability (%) | 0.304 | 0.066 | 0.283 | < 0.001 |
Explanatory variables were age, height, and toe curl ability.
β: standardised partial regression coefficient.
Adjusted R2=0.404.