Literature DB >> 24853838

The effects of viewing axis on laparoscopic performance: a comparison of non-expert and expert laparoscopic surgeons.

Rebecca Rhee1, Gladys Fernandez, Ron Bush, Neal E Seymour.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the ideal relationship of telescope viewing axis and instrument working axis in laparoscopic surgery is co-axial, it is often necessary to deviate view of the surgical field from the direction of working instruments with potentially negative implications to performance. The objectives of this study are to (1) characterize performance effects of working progressively further off telescope viewing axis and (2) compare the ability of expert laparoscopic surgeons and non-expert surgeons to compensate for the psychomotor problems imposed by off-axis viewing.
METHODS: Subjects included Baystate Medical Center surgical residents between PGY 1 and PGY 5 training years and attending surgeons. Expert subjects (>250 basic and >50 advanced laparoscopic cases, N = 6) and non-expert subjects (N = 11) performed the FLS peg transfer task in a box trainer configured to accept a laparoscope inserted at 0°, 45°, 90°, 135°, and 180° viewing angles relative to axis of working instruments. Performance measures included time to task completion (seconds), errors (# dropped objects), and percent completed transfers. Statistical analysis took into account repeated measures within each subject for each performance measure. Trends were assessed using linear contrasts for trend (p-trend). Differences between experts and non-experts were evaluated using an interaction term (p-interaction).
RESULTS: Overall there was increased time to completion (p < 0.001), increased number of dropped pegs (p < 0.001), and decreased percentage of completed transfers (<0.001) as the viewing axis relative to working instruments increased from 0° to 180°. Overall, expert laparoscopic surgeons demonstrated significantly shorter time to completion (p < 0.0027), fewer dropped pegs (p < 0.001), and higher percentage of completed peg transfers (p < 0.0001) compared to non-expert surgeons.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgeon performance degrades as viewing axis increases from 0° to 180° relative to working instruments. Expert laparoscopic surgeons perform better than non-expert surgeons when working off the laparoscope viewing axis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24853838     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3515-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  10 in total

1.  Influence of the optical axis-to-target view angle on endoscopic task performance.

Authors:  G B Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Reverse alignment "mirror image" visualization as a laparoscopic training tool improves task performance.

Authors:  Ward J Dunnican; T Paul Singh; Ashar Ata; Emma E Bendana; Thomas D Conlee; Charles J Dolce; Rakesh Ramakrishnan
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Learning curve of assistants in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: overcoming mirror imaging.

Authors:  Mi Ri Hwang; Guh Jung Seo; Sang Bum Yoo; Ji Won Park; Hyo Seong Choi; Jae Hwan Oh; Seung-Yong Jeong
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  The role of mental rotation and memory scanning on the performance of laparoscopic skills: a study on the effect of camera rotational angle.

Authors:  J Conrad; A H Shah; C M Divino; S Schluender; B Gurland; E Shlasko; A Szold
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Computer-based laparoscopic and robotic surgical simulators: performance characteristics and perceptions of new users.

Authors:  David W Lin; John R Romanelli; Jay N Kuhn; Renee E Thompson; Ron W Bush; Neal E Seymour
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Reverse-alignment surgical skills assessment.

Authors:  Jon C Gould; James Frydman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  An ergonomic analysis of the effects of camera rotation on laparoscopic performance.

Authors:  Anthony G Gallagher; Musallam Al-Akash; Neal E Seymour; Richard M Satava
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills.

Authors:  A G Gallagher; N McClure; J McGuigan; K Ritchie; N P Sheehy
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  The impact of training under different visual-spatial conditions on reverse-alignment laparoscopic skills development.

Authors:  Catherine Holznecht; Travis Schmidt; Jon Gould
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-08-20       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Randomised study of influence of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional imaging on performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  G B Hanna; S M Shimi; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-01-24       Impact factor: 79.321

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Physical and Mental Impact of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy on the Surgeon: French vs. American Positions. A Randomized and Controlled Study.

Authors:  José E Carmona; Jorge A Higuerey; Doubraska Gil; Mabel Castillo; Valentina Escalona
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Laparoscopic Simulation in Reverse and Side Alignment Impact on Forward Alignment Performance: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Nashwa Khogali-Jakary; John J Kanitra; Pamela S Haan; Cheryl I Anderson; Alan T Davis; David Henry; Rama Gupta; Caroline Moon; Terry McLeod; Elahé T Crockett; Srinivas Kavuturu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Canine laparoscopic ovariectomy using two 3- and 5-mm portal sites: A prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Juan-Ramón Granados; Jesús Usón-Casaus; José-Manuel Martínez; Francisco Sánchez-Margallo; Eva Pérez-Merino
Journal:  Can Vet J       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 1.008

4.  Quantifying Intraoperative Laparoscopic Visual Field Opacity.

Authors:  Danielle Abbitt; Bertha Ben Khallouq; Jay Redan
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2017 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

5.  Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial.

Authors:  Cecilia Nilsson; Jette Led Sorensen; Lars Konge; Mikkel Westen; Morten Stadeager; Bent Ottesen; Flemming Bjerrum
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.584

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.