D Kaski1, R O Dominguez2, J H Allum3, A F Islam4, A M Bronstein5. 1. Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK Universidad de Buenos Aires, Hospital Sirio Libanés Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina d.kaski@imperial.ac.uk. 2. Universidad de Buenos Aires, Hospital Sirio Libanés Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 3. University ORL Clinic, Basel, Switzerland. 4. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK. 5. Division of Brain Sciences, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To improve gait and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease by combining anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with physical training. DESIGN: In a double-blind design, one group (physical training; n = 8) underwent gait and balance training during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; real/sham). Real stimulation consisted of 15 minutes of 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor and premotor cortex. For sham, the current was switched off after 30 seconds. Patients received the opposite stimulation (sham/real) with physical training one week later; the second group (No physical training; n = 8) received stimulation (real/sham) but no training, and also repeated a sequential transcranial direct current stimulation session one week later (sham/real). SETTING: Hospital Srio Libanes, Buenos Aires, Argentina. SUBJECTS: Sixteen community-dwelling patients with Parkinson's disease. INTERVENTIONS: Transcranial direct current stimulation with and without concomitant physical training. MAIN MEASURES: Gait velocity (primary gait outcome), stride length, timed 6-minute walk test, Timed Up and Go Test (secondary outcomes), and performance on the pull test (primary balance outcome). RESULTS: Transcranial direct current stimulation with physical training increased gait velocity (mean = 29.5%, SD = 13; p < 0.01) and improved balance (pull test: mean = 50.9%, SD = 37; p = 0.01) compared with transcranial direct current stimulation alone. There was no isolated benefit of transcranial direct current stimulation alone. Although physical training improved gait velocity (mean = 15.5%, SD = 12.3; p = 0.03), these effects were comparatively less than with combined tDCS + physical therapy (p < 0.025). Greater stimulation-related improvements were seen in patients with more advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation during physical training improves gait and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease. Power calculations revealed that 14 patients per treatment arm (α = 0.05; power = 0.8) are required for a definitive trial.
OBJECTIVE: To improve gait and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease by combining anodal transcranial direct current stimulation with physical training. DESIGN: In a double-blind design, one group (physical training; n = 8) underwent gait and balance training during transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS; real/sham). Real stimulation consisted of 15 minutes of 2 mA transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor and premotor cortex. For sham, the current was switched off after 30 seconds. Patients received the opposite stimulation (sham/real) with physical training one week later; the second group (No physical training; n = 8) received stimulation (real/sham) but no training, and also repeated a sequential transcranial direct current stimulation session one week later (sham/real). SETTING: Hospital Srio Libanes, Buenos Aires, Argentina. SUBJECTS: Sixteen community-dwelling patients with Parkinson's disease. INTERVENTIONS: Transcranial direct current stimulation with and without concomitant physical training. MAIN MEASURES: Gait velocity (primary gait outcome), stride length, timed 6-minute walk test, Timed Up and Go Test (secondary outcomes), and performance on the pull test (primary balance outcome). RESULTS: Transcranial direct current stimulation with physical training increased gait velocity (mean = 29.5%, SD = 13; p < 0.01) and improved balance (pull test: mean = 50.9%, SD = 37; p = 0.01) compared with transcranial direct current stimulation alone. There was no isolated benefit of transcranial direct current stimulation alone. Although physical training improved gait velocity (mean = 15.5%, SD = 12.3; p = 0.03), these effects were comparatively less than with combined tDCS + physical therapy (p < 0.025). Greater stimulation-related improvements were seen in patients with more advanced disease. CONCLUSIONS: Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation during physical training improves gait and balance in patients with Parkinson's disease. Power calculations revealed that 14 patients per treatment arm (α = 0.05; power = 0.8) are required for a definitive trial.
Authors: Marom Bikson; Pnina Grossman; Chris Thomas; Adantchede Louis Zannou; Jimmy Jiang; Tatheer Adnan; Antonios P Mourdoukoutas; Greg Kronberg; Dennis Truong; Paulo Boggio; André R Brunoni; Leigh Charvet; Felipe Fregni; Brita Fritsch; Bernadette Gillick; Roy H Hamilton; Benjamin M Hampstead; Ryan Jankord; Adam Kirton; Helena Knotkova; David Liebetanz; Anli Liu; Colleen Loo; Michael A Nitsche; Janine Reis; Jessica D Richardson; Alexander Rotenberg; Peter E Turkeltaub; Adam J Woods Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Nadja Doerig; Rosa J Seinsche; Marius Moisa; Erich Seifritz; Christian C Ruff; Birgit Kleim Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-07-20 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: John Tyler Floyd; Chad Lairamore; Mark Kevin Garrision; Adam J Woods; Jacqueline L Rainey; Thomas Kiser; Prasad R Padala; Mark Mennemeier Journal: Front Neurol Neurosci Res Date: 2020-10-08
Authors: Gilles Allali; Helena M Blumen; Hervé Devanne; Elvira Pirondini; Arnaud Delval; Dimitri Van De Ville Journal: Neurophysiol Clin Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 3.734