Literature DB >> 27372845

Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Evidence Based Update 2016.

Marom Bikson1, Pnina Grossman2, Chris Thomas2, Adantchede Louis Zannou2, Jimmy Jiang2, Tatheer Adnan2, Antonios P Mourdoukoutas2, Greg Kronberg2, Dennis Truong2, Paulo Boggio3, André R Brunoni4, Leigh Charvet5, Felipe Fregni6, Brita Fritsch7, Bernadette Gillick8, Roy H Hamilton9, Benjamin M Hampstead10, Ryan Jankord11, Adam Kirton12, Helena Knotkova13, David Liebetanz14, Anli Liu15, Colleen Loo16, Michael A Nitsche17, Janine Reis7, Jessica D Richardson18, Alexander Rotenberg19, Peter E Turkeltaub20, Adam J Woods21.   

Abstract

This review updates and consolidates evidence on the safety of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Safety is here operationally defined by, and limited to, the absence of evidence for a Serious Adverse Effect, the criteria for which are rigorously defined. This review adopts an evidence-based approach, based on an aggregation of experience from human trials, taking care not to confuse speculation on potential hazards or lack of data to refute such speculation with evidence for risk. Safety data from animal tests for tissue damage are reviewed with systematic consideration of translation to humans. Arbitrary safety considerations are avoided. Computational models are used to relate dose to brain exposure in humans and animals. We review relevant dose-response curves and dose metrics (e.g. current, duration, current density, charge, charge density) for meaningful safety standards. Special consideration is given to theoretically vulnerable populations including children and the elderly, subjects with mood disorders, epilepsy, stroke, implants, and home users. Evidence from relevant animal models indicates that brain injury by Direct Current Stimulation (DCS) occurs at predicted brain current densities (6.3-13 A/m(2)) that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by conventional tDCS. To date, the use of conventional tDCS protocols in human trials (≤40 min, ≤4 milliamperes, ≤7.2 Coulombs) has not produced any reports of a Serious Adverse Effect or irreversible injury across over 33,200 sessions and 1000 subjects with repeated sessions. This includes a wide variety of subjects, including persons from potentially vulnerable populations.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Electrical stimulation; Mood disorders; Safety; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; tDCS; tDCS safety

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27372845      PMCID: PMC5007190          DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Stimul        ISSN: 1876-4754            Impact factor:   8.955


  183 in total

Review 1.  Successful aging: Advancing the science of physical independence in older adults.

Authors:  Stephen D Anton; Adam J Woods; Tetso Ashizawa; Diana Barb; Thomas W Buford; Christy S Carter; David J Clark; Ronald A Cohen; Duane B Corbett; Yenisel Cruz-Almeida; Vonetta Dotson; Natalie Ebner; Philip A Efron; Roger B Fillingim; Thomas C Foster; David M Gundermann; Anna-Maria Joseph; Christy Karabetian; Christiaan Leeuwenburgh; Todd M Manini; Michael Marsiske; Robert T Mankowski; Heather L Mutchie; Michael G Perri; Sanjay Ranka; Parisa Rashidi; Bhanuprasad Sandesara; Philip J Scarpace; Kimberly T Sibille; Laurence M Solberg; Shinichi Someya; Connie Uphold; Stephanie Wohlgemuth; Samuel Shangwu Wu; Marco Pahor
Journal:  Ageing Res Rev       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 10.895

2.  Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in a realistic head model.

Authors:  Rosalind J Sadleir; Tracy D Vannorsdall; David J Schretlen; Barry Gordon
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Neuromodulation therapies for geriatric depression.

Authors:  Verònica Gálvez; Kerrie-Anne Ho; Angelo Alonzo; Donel Martin; Duncan George; Colleen K Loo
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 5.285

4.  Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS.

Authors:  Preet Minhas; Varun Bansal; Jinal Patel; Johnson S Ho; Julian Diaz; Abhishek Datta; Marom Bikson
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  A comparison of the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation and caffeine on vigilance and cognitive performance during extended wakefulness.

Authors:  Lindsey K McIntire; R Andy McKinley; Chuck Goodyear; Justin Nelson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 8.955

6.  Low-frequency electric cortical stimulation decreases interictal and ictal activity in human epilepsy.

Authors:  Junichi Yamamoto; Akio Ikeda; Masako Kinoshita; Riki Matsumoto; Takeshi Satow; Kazuhide Takeshita; Masao Matsuhashi; Nobuhiro Mikuni; Susumu Miyamoto; Nobuo Hashimoto; Hiroshi Shibasaki
Journal:  Seizure       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 3.184

7.  Induction of late LTP-like plasticity in the human motor cortex by repeated non-invasive brain stimulation.

Authors:  Katia Monte-Silva; Min-Fang Kuo; Silvia Hessenthaler; Shane Fresnoza; David Liebetanz; Walter Paulus; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 8.955

8.  Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients.

Authors:  Csaba Poreisz; Klára Boros; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Brain Res Bull       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 4.077

9.  Time up and go task performance improves after transcranial direct current stimulation in patient affected by Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Rosa Manenti; Michela Brambilla; Sandra Rosini; Italo Orizio; Clarissa Ferrari; Barbara Borroni; Maria Cotelli
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 3.046

10.  The ineffective role of cathodal tDCS in enhancing the functional motor outcomes in early phase of stroke rehabilitation: an experimental trial.

Authors:  Augusto Fusco; Federica Assenza; Marco Iosa; Simona Izzo; Riccardo Altavilla; Stefano Paolucci; Fabrizio Vernieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 3.411

View more
  301 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of default mode network parietal nodes decreases negative mind-wandering about the past.

Authors:  Tina Chou; Jill M Hooley; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Cognit Ther Res       Date:  2019-09-28

2.  Augmenting cognitive training in older adults (The ACT Study): Design and Methods of a Phase III tDCS and cognitive training trial.

Authors:  Adam J Woods; Ronald Cohen; Michael Marsiske; Gene E Alexander; Sara J Czaja; Samuel Wu
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 2.226

3.  tDCS to the left DLPFC modulates cognitive and physiological correlates of executive function in a state-dependent manner.

Authors:  Laura Dubreuil-Vall; Peggy Chau; Giulio Ruffini; Alik S Widge; Joan A Camprodon
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-06-06       Impact factor: 8.955

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treating Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Leandro da Costa Lane Valiengo; Stephan Goerigk; Pedro Caldana Gordon; Frank Padberg; Mauricio Henriques Serpa; Stephanie Koebe; Leonardo Afonso Dos Santos; Roger Alberto Marcos Lovera; Juliana Barbosa de Carvalho; Martinus van de Bilt; Acioly L T Lacerda; Helio Elkis; Wagner Farid Gattaz; Andre R Brunoni
Journal:  JAMA Psychiatry       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 21.596

Review 5.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation as a Therapeutic Tool for Chronic Pain.

Authors:  Camila Bonin Pinto; Beatriz Teixeira Costa; Dante Duarte; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 3.635

6.  Adaptive current tDCS up to 4 mA.

Authors:  Niranjan Khadka; Helen Borges; Bhaskar Paneri; Trynia Kaufman; Electra Nassis; Adantchede L Zannou; Yungjae Shin; Hyeongseob Choi; Seonghoon Kim; Kiwon Lee; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-08-05       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 7.  Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: Safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines.

Authors:  A Antal; I Alekseichuk; M Bikson; J Brockmöller; A R Brunoni; R Chen; L G Cohen; G Dowthwaite; J Ellrich; A Flöel; F Fregni; M S George; R Hamilton; J Haueisen; C S Herrmann; F C Hummel; J P Lefaucheur; D Liebetanz; C K Loo; C D McCaig; C Miniussi; P C Miranda; V Moliadze; M A Nitsche; R Nowak; F Padberg; A Pascual-Leone; W Poppendieck; A Priori; S Rossi; P M Rossini; J Rothwell; M A Rueger; G Ruffini; K Schellhorn; H R Siebner; Y Ugawa; A Wexler; U Ziemann; M Hallett; W Paulus
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 9.  Electrical stimulation of cranial nerves in cognition and disease.

Authors:  Devin Adair; Dennis Truong; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Nigel Gebodh; Helen Borges; Libby Ho; J Douglas Bremner; Bashar W Badran; Vitaly Napadow; Vincent P Clark; Marom Bikson
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2020-02-23       Impact factor: 8.955

10.  Efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation over primary motor cortex (anode) and contralateral supraorbital area (cathode) on clinical pain severity and mobility performance in persons with knee osteoarthritis: An experimenter- and participant-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled pilot clinical study.

Authors:  Hyochol Ahn; Adam J Woods; Mark E Kunik; Abhishek Bhattacharjee; Zhiguo Chen; Eunyoung Choi; Roger B Fillingim
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.