| Literature DB >> 27372845 |
Marom Bikson1, Pnina Grossman2, Chris Thomas2, Adantchede Louis Zannou2, Jimmy Jiang2, Tatheer Adnan2, Antonios P Mourdoukoutas2, Greg Kronberg2, Dennis Truong2, Paulo Boggio3, André R Brunoni4, Leigh Charvet5, Felipe Fregni6, Brita Fritsch7, Bernadette Gillick8, Roy H Hamilton9, Benjamin M Hampstead10, Ryan Jankord11, Adam Kirton12, Helena Knotkova13, David Liebetanz14, Anli Liu15, Colleen Loo16, Michael A Nitsche17, Janine Reis7, Jessica D Richardson18, Alexander Rotenberg19, Peter E Turkeltaub20, Adam J Woods21.
Abstract
This review updates and consolidates evidence on the safety of transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Safety is here operationally defined by, and limited to, the absence of evidence for a Serious Adverse Effect, the criteria for which are rigorously defined. This review adopts an evidence-based approach, based on an aggregation of experience from human trials, taking care not to confuse speculation on potential hazards or lack of data to refute such speculation with evidence for risk. Safety data from animal tests for tissue damage are reviewed with systematic consideration of translation to humans. Arbitrary safety considerations are avoided. Computational models are used to relate dose to brain exposure in humans and animals. We review relevant dose-response curves and dose metrics (e.g. current, duration, current density, charge, charge density) for meaningful safety standards. Special consideration is given to theoretically vulnerable populations including children and the elderly, subjects with mood disorders, epilepsy, stroke, implants, and home users. Evidence from relevant animal models indicates that brain injury by Direct Current Stimulation (DCS) occurs at predicted brain current densities (6.3-13 A/m(2)) that are over an order of magnitude above those produced by conventional tDCS. To date, the use of conventional tDCS protocols in human trials (≤40 min, ≤4 milliamperes, ≤7.2 Coulombs) has not produced any reports of a Serious Adverse Effect or irreversible injury across over 33,200 sessions and 1000 subjects with repeated sessions. This includes a wide variety of subjects, including persons from potentially vulnerable populations.Entities:
Keywords: Electrical stimulation; Mood disorders; Safety; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation; tDCS; tDCS safety
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27372845 PMCID: PMC5007190 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2016.06.004
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Stimul ISSN: 1876-4754 Impact factor: 8.955