John Tyler Floyd1, Chad Lairamore2, Mark Kevin Garrision1, Adam J Woods3, Jacqueline L Rainey4, Thomas Kiser5, Prasad R Padala6, Mark Mennemeier1,7. 1. University of Central Arkansas, Department of Physical Therapy, Conway, AR, USA 72035. 2. Western University of Health Sciences, Department of Physical Therapy Education, Lebanon, OR 97355. 3. University of Florida, Department of Clinical and Health Psychology, Gainesville, FL 32610. 4. University of Central Arkansas, Department of Health Sciences, Conway, AR, USA 72035. 5. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Little Rock, AR 72205. 6. Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System, Little Rock, AR 72205. 7. University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Department of Neurobiology & Developmental Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter cortical excitability of the lower extremity (LE) and to influence performance on LE tasks like ankle tracking accuracy; but no study, to our knowledge, ever reported a significant change in cortical excitability relative to sham-tDCS. Additionally, because several different electrode montages were used in previous studies, it is difficult to know how stimulation should be applied to achieve this effect. Our objective was to determine whether active-tDCS alters cortical excitability of the LE and ankle tracking accuracy relative to sham-tDCS in healthy participants. The efficacy of two electrode montages and two conductance mediums were compared. METHODS: A triple-blind, fully randomized, within-subjects study was conducted with healthy participants (N=18, 24.2 (6.6) years). Cortical recruitment curves and measures of ankle tracking accuracy for the dominant lower extremity were obtained before and after participants received active-tDCS at 2 milliamps for 20 minutes using montage-medium combinations of M1-SO:Saline, M1-SO:Gel, C1-C2:Saline, and C1-C2:Gel and a sham-tDCS condition (M1-SO: Saline). RESULTS: The motor evoked potential maximum of the recruitment curve was significantly lower for active than sham-tDCS, but only for the M1-SO:Saline combination. No other significant differences in the recruitment curve parameters or in ankle tracking were found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate a significant difference in cortical excitability of the LE between active and sham-tDCS conditions. Given the order in which the experimental procedures occurred, the result is consistent with the concept of a homeostatic plasticity response.
OBJECTIVE: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been used to alter cortical excitability of the lower extremity (LE) and to influence performance on LE tasks like ankle tracking accuracy; but no study, to our knowledge, ever reported a significant change in cortical excitability relative to sham-tDCS. Additionally, because several different electrode montages were used in previous studies, it is difficult to know how stimulation should be applied to achieve this effect. Our objective was to determine whether active-tDCS alters cortical excitability of the LE and ankle tracking accuracy relative to sham-tDCS in healthy participants. The efficacy of two electrode montages and two conductance mediums were compared. METHODS: A triple-blind, fully randomized, within-subjects study was conducted with healthy participants (N=18, 24.2 (6.6) years). Cortical recruitment curves and measures of ankle tracking accuracy for the dominant lower extremity were obtained before and after participants received active-tDCS at 2 milliamps for 20 minutes using montage-medium combinations of M1-SO:Saline, M1-SO:Gel, C1-C2:Saline, and C1-C2:Gel and a sham-tDCS condition (M1-SO: Saline). RESULTS: The motor evoked potential maximum of the recruitment curve was significantly lower for active than sham-tDCS, but only for the M1-SO:Saline combination. No other significant differences in the recruitment curve parameters or in ankle tracking were found. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to our knowledge to demonstrate a significant difference in cortical excitability of the LE between active and sham-tDCS conditions. Given the order in which the experimental procedures occurred, the result is consistent with the concept of a homeostatic plasticity response.
Authors: Nicolas Lang; Hartwig R Siebner; Diana Ernst; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus; Roger N Lemon; John C Rothwell Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2004-11-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Anke Karabanov; Ulf Ziemann; Masashi Hamada; Mark S George; Angelo Quartarone; Joseph Classen; Marcello Massimini; John Rothwell; Hartwig Roman Siebner Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2015-04-01 Impact factor: 8.955
Authors: Jorik Nonnekes; Anass Arrogi; Moniek A M Munneke; Edwin H F van Asseldonk; Lars B Oude Nijhuis; Alexander C Geurts; Vivian Weerdesteyn Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-09-18 Impact factor: 3.240