Literature DB >> 33150514

Does anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation of the damaged primary motor cortex affects wrist flexor muscle spasticity and also activity of the wrist flexor and extensor muscles in patients with stroke?: a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Sara Halakoo1, Fatemeh Ehsani2, Nooshin Masoudian3, Maryam Zoghi4, Shapour Jaberzadeh5.   

Abstract

Spasticity is a common symptom in stroke survivors. This study is double-blinded, sham-controlled randomized, clinical trial with three parallel arms. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of anodal trans-cranial direct current stimulation (a-tDCS) over the damaged primary motor cortex (M1) on spasticity of the wrist flexor and also the activity of wrist flexor and extensor muscles in sub-acute stroke patients. This study was performed on 32 stroke patients. The patients are assigned to three groups (intervention, sham, and control). All participants in the first two groups received 20-min concurrent M1 a-tDCS or sham tDCS and functional electrical stimulation (FES) for 10 sessions (5 sessions per week), while participants in control group were given only 20-min FES for 10 sessions. Modified Ashworth scale of wrist flexors and also electromyography (EMG) activity of flexor carpi radialis (FCR) and extensor carpi radialis (ECR) were recorded before, immediately, and 1 month after the interventions. A significant reduction was shown in the MAS and EMG activity of FCR muscle at passive rest position of the wrist, immediately and 1 month after the intervention in M1 a-tDCS compared to sham and control groups (p < 0.001). Also, the EMG activity of FCR and ECR muscles during active wrist flexion and extension increased immediately and 1 month after intervention in M1 a-tDCS compared to the other groups, respectively (p < 0.001). M1 a-tDCS can significantly decrease the spasticity of wrist flexor muscle and also increase the wrist flexor and extensor muscles activity in stroke patients during active flexion and extension.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ashworth scale; Electromyography; Muscle activity; Spasticity; Stroke; Trans-cranial direct current stimulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 33150514     DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04858-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurol Sci        ISSN: 1590-1874            Impact factor:   3.307


  41 in total

1.  Botulinum toxin A for upper limb spasticity.

Authors:  Gert Kwakkel; Carel G M Meskers
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 44.182

Review 2.  Safety and efficacy of botulinum toxin type A following long-term use.

Authors:  M Naumann; A Albanese; F Heinen; G Molenaers; M Relja
Journal:  Eur J Neurol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 6.089

3.  Combined transcranial direct current stimulation and robot-assisted arm training in subacute stroke patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  S Hesse; C Werner; E M Schonhardt; A Bardeleben; W Jenrich; S G B Kirker
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation for improving spasticity after stroke: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bernhard Elsner; Joachim Kugler; Marcus Pohl; Jan Mehrholz
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 2.912

5.  BoTULS: a multicentre randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of treating upper limb spasticity due to stroke with botulinum toxin type A.

Authors:  L Shaw; H Rodgers; C Price; F van Wijck; P Shackley; N Steen; M Barnes; G Ford; L Graham
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 4.014

6.  Effect of transcranial direct current stimulation on postural stability and lower extremity strength in hemiplegic stroke patients.

Authors:  Min Kyun Sohn; Sung Ju Jee; Yeong Wook Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2013-12-23

Review 7.  Poststroke spasticity: sequelae and burden on stroke survivors and caregivers.

Authors:  Richard D Zorowitz; Patrick J Gillard; Michael Brainin
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Effects of the addition of transcranial direct current stimulation to virtual reality therapy after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  R T Viana; G E C Laurentino; R J P Souza; J B Fonseca; E M Silva Filho; S N Dias; L F Teixeira-Salmela; K K Monte-Silva
Journal:  NeuroRehabilitation       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.138

Review 9.  Spasticity, Motor Recovery, and Neural Plasticity after Stroke.

Authors:  Sheng Li
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 10.  Predictors of Spasticity After Stroke.

Authors:  Katharina Stibrant Sunnerhagen
Journal:  Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep       Date:  2016-07-22
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation on Post-Stroke Spasticity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Xiaohan Wang; Le Ge; Huijing Hu; Li Yan; Le Li
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-06-27

Review 2.  Non-invasive brain stimulation for improving gait, balance, and lower limbs motor function in stroke.

Authors:  Jitka Veldema; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-03       Impact factor: 5.208

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.