Literature DB >> 24849365

Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates visual motion adaptation.

Kohitij Kar1, Bart Krekelberg2.   

Abstract

Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is used in clinical applications and basic neuroscience research. Although its behavioral effects are evident from prior reports, current understanding of the mechanisms that underlie these effects is limited. We used motion perception, a percept with relatively well known properties and underlying neural mechanisms to investigate tACS mechanisms. Healthy human volunteers showed a surprising improvement in motion sensitivity when visual stimuli were paired with 10 Hz tACS. In addition, tACS reduced the motion-after effect, and this reduction was correlated with the improvement in motion sensitivity. Electrical stimulation had no consistent effect when applied before presenting a visual stimulus or during recovery from motion adaptation. Together, these findings suggest that perceptual effects of tACS result from an attenuation of adaptation. Important consequences for the practical use of tACS follow from our work. First, because this mechanism interferes only with adaptation, this suggests that tACS can be targeted at subsets of neurons (by adapting them), even when the applied currents spread widely throughout the brain. Second, by interfering with adaptation, this mechanism provides a means by which electrical stimulation can generate behavioral effects that outlast the stimulation.
Copyright © 2014 the authors 0270-6474/14/347334-07$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  discrimination sensitivity; mechanisms; motion adaptation; motion after effect; transcranial alternating current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24849365      PMCID: PMC4028503          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5248-13.2014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  41 in total

1.  Cellular mechanisms of long-lasting adaptation in visual cortical neurons in vitro.

Authors:  M V Sanchez-Vives; L G Nowak; D A McCormick
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  THE USE OF DECAY INHIBITION IN AN EXAMINATION OF CENTRAL MEDIATION IN MOVEMENT AFTEREFFECTS.

Authors:  I M SPIGEL
Journal:  J Gen Psychol       Date:  1964-04

3.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Modulating parameters of excitability during and after transcranial direct current stimulation of the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Michael A Nitsche; Antje Seeber; Kai Frommann; Cornelia Carmen Klein; Christian Rochford; Maren S Nitsche; Kristina Fricke; David Liebetanz; Nicolas Lang; Andrea Antal; Walter Paulus; Frithjof Tergau
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-07       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 5.  Visual adaptation: physiology, mechanisms, and functional benefits.

Authors:  Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-07       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Slow oscillation electrical brain stimulation during waking promotes EEG theta activity and memory encoding.

Authors:  Roumen Kirov; Carsten Weiss; Hartwig R Siebner; Jan Born; Lisa Marshall
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans.

Authors:  M A Nitsche; W Paulus
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2001-11-27       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Receptive field positions in area MT during slow eye movements.

Authors:  Till S Hartmann; Frank Bremmer; Thomas D Albright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Driving oscillatory activity in the human cortex enhances motor performance.

Authors:  Raed A Joundi; Ned Jenkinson; John-Stuart Brittain; Tipu Z Aziz; Peter Brown
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  The complex structure of receptive fields in the middle temporal area.

Authors:  Micah Richert; Thomas D Albright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06
View more
  22 in total

1.  Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Russell D Hamer; Balázs V Nagy; Mirella T S Barboni; Mirella Gualtieri; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Transcranial electrical stimulation nomenclature.

Authors:  Marom Bikson; Zeinab Esmaeilpour; Devin Adair; Greg Kronberg; William J Tyler; Andrea Antal; Abhishek Datta; Bernhard A Sabel; Michael A Nitsche; Colleen Loo; Dylan Edwards; Hamed Ekhtiari; Helena Knotkova; Adam J Woods; Benjamin M Hampstead; Bashar W Badran; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 8.955

3.  Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Toward an integrative perspective on the neural mechanisms underlying persistent maladaptive behaviors.

Authors:  Maria M Diehl; Karolina M Lempert; Ashley C Parr; Ian Ballard; Vaughn R Steele; David V Smith
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates BOLD adaptation and increases functional connectivity.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Takuya Ito; Michael W Cole; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Best of both worlds: promise of combining brain stimulation and brain connectome.

Authors:  Caroline Di Bernardi Luft; Ernesto Pereda; Michael J Banissy; Joydeep Bhattacharya
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-30

Review 8.  Mapping the mechanisms of transcranial alternating current stimulation: a pathway from network effects to cognition.

Authors:  Ruairidh M Battleday; Timothy Muller; Michael S Clayton; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Commentary: On the possible role of stimulation duration for after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-29

10.  Sustained Aftereffect of α-tACS Lasts Up to 70 min after Stimulation.

Authors:  Florian H Kasten; James Dowsett; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.