Literature DB >> 25600818

Transcranial direct current stimulation can selectively affect different processing channels in human visual cortex.

Thiago L Costa1, Russell D Hamer, Balázs V Nagy, Mirella T S Barboni, Mirella Gualtieri, Paulo S Boggio, Dora F Ventura.   

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate cortical activity. Nonetheless, information regarding its functional specificity and the extent by which visual performance can be modulated is still lacking. Here, we used vision as model to address if it differentially affects different cell groups in the stimulated area. We applied tDCS to the occiput and performed a series of visual tests in a sham-controlled repeated-measures design. Achromatic contrast sensitivity was assessed psychophysically during tDCS, with tasks designed to target specific spatial frequency (SF) channels, inferred ON, OFF channels and inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways of the visual system. Sweep visual evoked potential (sVEP) for contrast sensitivity and Vernier acuity was recorded before and after tDCS. Anodal tDCS significantly increased thresholds for luminance decrements (OFF) only for the inferred magnocellular thresholds. Although tDCS had no significant effects on Vernier or contrast sVEP thresholds, it modulated suprathreshold amplitudes for both tasks. Cathodal tDCS increased sVEP amplitudes at a low SF, decreased it at a medium, and had no effect at a high SF. Cathodal tDCS increased sVEP phase lags for low and decreased it for high SF (maximum change corresponding to change in apparent latency >6 ms). Cathodal and anodal stimulation decreased amplitudes of sVEP Vernier responses. Exclusive tDCS effects on magnocellular thresholds agree with reports of pathway-specific tDCS effects. The dependence of tDCS effects on SF and contrast levels further suggests that tDCS differentially affects different cell groups in the visual cortex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25600818     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4199-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Comparison of visual field training for hemianopia with active versus sham transcranial direct cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Ela B Plow; Souzana N Obretenova; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Lotfi B Merabet
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-01-30       Impact factor: 3.919

Review 2.  Structure and function of parallel pathways in the primate early visual system.

Authors:  Edward M Callaway
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Investigation of tDCS volume conduction effects in a highly realistic head model.

Authors:  S Wagner; S M Rampersad; Ü Aydin; J Vorwerk; T F Oostendorp; T Neuling; C S Herrmann; D F Stegeman; C H Wolters
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 5.379

4.  Assessment of contrast gain signature in inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in patients with glaucoma.

Authors:  Hao Sun; William H Swanson; Brian Arvidson; Mitchell W Dul
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning.

Authors:  Brita Fritsch; Janine Reis; Keri Martinowich; Heidi M Schambra; Yuanyuan Ji; Leonardo G Cohen; Bai Lu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Contribution of axonal orientation to pathway-dependent modulation of excitatory transmission by direct current stimulation in isolated rat hippocampus.

Authors:  Anatoli Y Kabakov; Paul A Muller; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Frances E Jensen; Alexander Rotenberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatial frequency adaptation can enhance contrast sensitivity.

Authors:  K K De Valois
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  The mental cost of cognitive enhancement.

Authors:  Teresa Iuculano; Roi Cohen Kadosh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Effects of transcranial electrical stimulation on cognition.

Authors:  Min-Fang Kuo; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Clin EEG Neurosci       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.843

10.  Transcranial direct current stimulation modulates human color discrimination in a pathway-specific manner.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Balázs V Nagy; Mirella T S Barboni; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 4.157

View more
  3 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on central and peripheral visual fields.

Authors:  Thiago L Costa; Mirella Gualtieri; Mirella T S Barboni; Rafael K Katayama; Paulo S Boggio; Dora F Ventura
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Beyond Rehabilitation of Acuity, Ocular Alignment, and Binocularity in Infantile Strabismus.

Authors:  Chantal Milleret; Emmanuel Bui Quoc
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-18

3.  Offline transcranial direct current stimulation improves the ability to perceive crowded targets.

Authors:  Guanpeng Chen; Ziyun Zhu; Qing He; Fang Fang
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.