Literature DB >> 28137971

Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation Attenuates Neuronal Adaptation.

Kohitij Kar1, Jacob Duijnhouwer2, Bart Krekelberg2.   

Abstract

We previously showed that brief application of 2 mA (peak-to-peak) transcranial currents alternating at 10 Hz significantly reduces motion adaptation in humans. This is but one of many behavioral studies showing that weak currents applied to the scalp modulate neural processing. Transcranial stimulation has been shown to improve perception, learning, and a range of clinical symptoms. Few studies, however, have measured the neural consequences of transcranial current stimulation. We capitalized on the strong link between motion perception and neural activity in the middle temporal (MT) area of the macaque monkey to study the neural mechanisms that underlie the behavioral consequences of transcranial alternating current stimulation. First, we observed that 2 mA currents generated substantial intracranial fields, which were much stronger in the stimulated hemisphere (0.12 V/m) than on the opposite side of the brain (0.03 V/m). Second, we found that brief application of transcranial alternating current stimulation at 10 Hz reduced spike-frequency adaptation of MT neurons and led to a broadband increase in the power spectrum of local field potentials. Together, these findings provide a direct demonstration that weak electric fields applied to the scalp significantly affect neural processing in the primate brain and that this includes a hitherto unknown mechanism that attenuates sensory adaptation.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Transcranial stimulation has been claimed to improve perception, learning, and a range of clinical symptoms. Little is known, however, how transcranial current stimulation generates such effects, and the search for better stimulation protocols proceeds largely by trial and error. We investigated, for the first time, the neural consequences of stimulation in the monkey brain. We found that even brief application of alternating current stimulation reduced the effects of adaptation on single-neuron firing rates and local field potentials; this mechanistic insight explains previous behavioral findings and suggests a novel way to modulate neural information processing using transcranial currents. In addition, by developing an animal model to help understand transcranial stimulation, this study will aid the rational design of stimulation protocols for the treatment of mental illnesses, and the improvement of perception and learning.
Copyright © 2017 the authors 0270-6474/17/372325-11$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  entrainment; local field potential; motion adaptation; motion after effect; neural mechanisms; transcranial alternating current stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28137971      PMCID: PMC5354346          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2266-16.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  49 in total

1.  The influence of surround suppression on adaptation effects in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Stephanie C Wissig; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Sensitivity of coherent oscillations in rat hippocampus to AC electric fields.

Authors:  Jacqueline K Deans; Andrew D Powell; John G R Jefferys
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Recent history of stimulus speeds affects the speed tuning of neurons in area MT.

Authors:  Anja Schlack; Bart Krekelberg; Thomas D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Retinal origin of phosphenes to transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Dennis J L G Schutter; Ruud Hortensius
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.708

5.  Induction of self awareness in dreams through frontal low current stimulation of gamma activity.

Authors:  Ursula Voss; Romain Holzmann; Allan Hobson; Walter Paulus; Judith Koppehele-Gossel; Ansgar Klimke; Michael A Nitsche
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Testing the assumptions underlying fMRI adaptation using intracortical recordings in area MT.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  Transcranial direct current stimulation: a computer-based human model study.

Authors:  Tim Wagner; Felipe Fregni; Shirley Fecteau; Alan Grodzinsky; Markus Zahn; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-02-04       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Retina or visual cortex? The site of phosphene induction by transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Caspar M Schwiedrzik
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-05-18

9.  Alpha and gamma oscillations characterize feedback and feedforward processing in monkey visual cortex.

Authors:  Timo van Kerkoerle; Matthew W Self; Bruno Dagnino; Marie-Alice Gariel-Mathis; Jasper Poort; Chris van der Togt; Pieter R Roelfsema
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Commentary: On the possible role of stimulation duration for after-effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-29
View more
  19 in total

1.  Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human.

Authors:  Ivan Alekseichuk; Kathleen Mantell; Sina Shirinpour; Alexander Opitz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation entrains single-neuron activity in the primate brain.

Authors:  Matthew R Krause; Pedro G Vieira; Bennett A Csorba; Praveen K Pilly; Christopher C Pack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Therapeutic noninvasive brain stimulation in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.

Authors:  Stephanie S Buss; Peter J Fried; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 5.710

4.  Exploring new transcranial electrical stimulation strategies to modulate brain function in animal models.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Álvaro Sánchez-López; Claudia Ammann; Isabel Cordones; Alejandro Carretero-Guillén; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Opin Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-09-12

5.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates BOLD adaptation and increases functional connectivity.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Takuya Ito; Michael W Cole; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Low-frequency stimulation enhances ensemble co-firing and dexterity after stroke.

Authors:  Preeya Khanna; Douglas Totten; Lisa Novik; Jeffrey Roberts; Robert J Morecraft; Karunesh Ganguly
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Correction: Measurements and models of electric fields in the in vivo human brain during transcranial electric stimulation.

Authors:  Yu Huang; Anli A Liu; Belen Lafon; Daniel Friedman; Michael Dayan; Xiuyuan Wang; Marom Bikson; Werner K Doyle; Orrin Devinsky; Lucas C Parra
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 8.  Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: A Paradigm Shift in Understanding Brain Oscillations.

Authors:  Johannes Vosskuhl; Daniel Strüber; Christoph S Herrmann
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Using animal models to improve the design and application of transcranial electrical stimulation in humans.

Authors:  Carlos A Sánchez-León; Claudia Ammann; Javier F Medina; Javier Márquez-Ruiz
Journal:  Curr Behav Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-04-25

10.  Direct effects of transcranial electric stimulation on brain circuits in rats and humans.

Authors:  Mihály Vöröslakos; Yuichi Takeuchi; Kitti Brinyiczki; Tamás Zombori; Azahara Oliva; Antonio Fernández-Ruiz; Gábor Kozák; Zsigmond Tamás Kincses; Béla Iványi; György Buzsáki; Antal Berényi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-02-02       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.