Literature DB >> 21775589

Receptive field positions in area MT during slow eye movements.

Till S Hartmann1, Frank Bremmer, Thomas D Albright, Bart Krekelberg.   

Abstract

Perceptual stability requires the integration of information across eye movements. We first tested the hypothesis that motion signals are integrated by neurons whose receptive fields (RFs) do not move with the eye but stay fixed in the world. Specifically, we measured the RF properties of neurons in the middle temporal area (MT) of macaques (Macaca mulatta) during the slow phase of optokinetic nystagmus. Using a novel method to estimate RF locations for both spikes and local field potentials, we found that the location on the retina that changed spike rates or local field potentials did not change with eye position; RFs moved with the eye. Second, we tested the hypothesis that neurons link information across eye positions by remapping the retinal location of their RFs to future locations. To test this, we compared RF locations during leftward and rightward slow phases of optokinetic nystagmus. We found no evidence for remapping during slow eye movements; the RF location was not affected by eye-movement direction. Together, our results show that RFs of MT neurons and the aggregate activity reflected in local field potentials are yoked to the eye during slow eye movements. This implies that individual MT neurons do not integrate sensory information from a single position in the world across eye movements. Future research will have to determine whether such integration, and the construction of perceptual stability, takes place in the form of a distributed population code in eye-centered visual cortex or is deferred to downstream areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21775589      PMCID: PMC3264053          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5590-10.2011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  46 in total

1.  Neural correlates of visual localization and perisaccadic mislocalization.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Michael Kubischik; Klaus-Peter Hoffmann; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2003-02-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Unsupervised spike detection and sorting with wavelets and superparamagnetic clustering.

Authors:  R Quian Quiroga; Z Nadasdy; Y Ben-Shaul
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.026

3.  The updating of the representation of visual space in parietal cortex by intended eye movements.

Authors:  J R Duhamel; C L Colby; M E Goldberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1992-01-03       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Marie Avillac; Sophie Denève; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Pouget; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  Neurometabolic coupling in cerebral cortex reflects synaptic more than spiking activity.

Authors:  Ahalya Viswanathan; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2007-09-09       Impact factor: 24.884

6.  Spatiotopic selectivity of BOLD responses to visual motion in human area MT.

Authors:  Giovanni d'Avossa; Michela Tosetti; Sofia Crespi; Laura Biagi; David C Burr; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2006-12-31       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  What happens if it changes color when it moves?: the nature of chromatic input to macaque visual area MT.

Authors:  K R Dobkins; T D Albright
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  A lack of anticipatory remapping of retinotopic receptive fields in the middle temporal area.

Authors:  Wei Song Ong; James W Bisley
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Comparative mapping of higher visual areas in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Guy A Orban; David Van Essen; Wim Vanduffel
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 20.229

10.  Expansion of visual space during optokinetic afternystagmus (OKAN).

Authors:  André Kaminiarz; Bart Krekelberg; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  20 in total

1.  Dynamics of visual receptive fields in the macaque frontal eye field.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; Amie R DiTomasso; Marc A Sommer; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Evidence and Counterevidence in Motion Perception.

Authors:  Jacob Duijnhouwer; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2015-10-03       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  Similar adaptation effects in primary visual cortex and area MT of the macaque monkey under matched stimulus conditions.

Authors:  Carlyn A Patterson; Jacob Duijnhouwer; Stephanie C Wissig; Bart Krekelberg; Adam Kohn
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-26       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Neural mechanisms of speed perception: transparent motion.

Authors:  Bart Krekelberg; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-07       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Dynamics of the functional link between area MT LFPs and motion detection.

Authors:  Jackson E T Smith; Vincent Beliveau; Alan Schoen; Jordana Remz; Chang'an A Zhan; Erik P Cook
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over posterior parietal cortex modulates visuospatial localization.

Authors:  Jessica M Wright; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Transcranial alternating current stimulation attenuates visual motion adaptation.

Authors:  Kohitij Kar; Bart Krekelberg
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Neurons in cortical area MST remap the memory trace of visual motion across saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Naoko Inaba; Kenji Kawano
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Circuits for presaccadic visual remapping.

Authors:  Hrishikesh M Rao; J Patrick Mayo; Marc A Sommer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Hunger-Dependent Enhancement of Food Cue Responses in Mouse Postrhinal Cortex and Lateral Amygdala.

Authors:  Christian R Burgess; Rohan N Ramesh; Arthur U Sugden; Kirsten M Levandowski; Margaret A Minnig; Henning Fenselau; Bradford B Lowell; Mark L Andermann
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 17.173

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.