Literature DB >> 24839389

Spatially Variant Positron Range Modeling Derived from CT for PET Image Reconstruction.

Adam Alessio1, Lawrence MacDonald1.   

Abstract

The influence of a finite positron annihilation distance represents a fundamental limit to the spatial resolution of PET scanners. It is appreciated that this effect is a minor concern in whole-body F18 imaging, but it does represent an issue when imaging with higher energy isotopes such as N13 or Rb82. This effect is especially relevant for imaging tasks along tissue gradients such as the cardiac/lung boundary and diaphragm/lung boundary. This work presents a method to determine the positron range effect from a CT scan and to model this effect as shift-variant, anisotropic kernels. The positron annihilation distance across boundaries of tissues is represented with a simple model, which can be quickly derived from CT scans and applied in the reconstruction of PET images. The positron range compensation map is applied in a modified OSEM algorithm to simulated and measured data.

Year:  2008        PMID: 24839389      PMCID: PMC4022692          DOI: 10.1109/NSSMIC.2008.4774106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)        ISSN: 1095-7863


  6 in total

1.  Effect of positron range on spatial resolution.

Authors:  M E Phelps; E J Hoffman; S C Huang; M M Ter-Pogossian
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 2.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners.

Authors:  Paul E Kinahan; Bruce H Hasegawa; Thomas Beyer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  GATE: a simulation toolkit for PET and SPECT.

Authors:  S Jan; G Santin; D Strul; S Staelens; K Assié; D Autret; S Avner; R Barbier; M Bardiès; P M Bloomfield; D Brasse; V Breton; P Bruyndonckx; I Buvat; A F Chatziioannou; Y Choi; Y H Chung; C Comtat; D Donnarieix; L Ferrer; S J Glick; C J Groiselle; D Guez; P F Honore; S Kerhoas-Cavata; A S Kirov; V Kohli; M Koole; M Krieguer; D J van der Laan; F Lamare; G Largeron; C Lartizien; D Lazaro; M C Maas; L Maigne; F Mayet; F Melot; C Merheb; E Pennacchio; J Perez; U Pietrzyk; F R Rannou; M Rey; D R Schaart; C R Schmidtlein; L Simon; T Y Song; J M Vieira; D Visvikis; R Van de Walle; E Wieërs; C Morel
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Positron follow-up in liquid water: II. Spatial and energetic study for the most important radioisotopes used in PET.

Authors:  C Champion; C Le Loirec
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 3.609

5.  Calculation of positron range and its effect on the fundamental limit of positron emission tomography system spatial resolution.

Authors:  C S Levin; E J Hoffman
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Positron ranges obtained from biomedically important positron-emitting radionuclides.

Authors:  Z H Cho; J K Chan; L Ericksson; M Singh; S Graham; N S MacDonald; Y Yano
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 10.057

  6 in total
  9 in total

1.  Feasibility of in situ, high-resolution correlation of tracer uptake with histopathology by quantitative autoradiography of biopsy specimens obtained under 18F-FDG PET/CT guidance.

Authors:  Louise M Fanchon; Snjezana Dogan; Andre L Moreira; Sean A Carlin; C Ross Schmidtlein; Ellen Yorke; Aditya P Apte; Irene A Burger; Jeremy C Durack; Joseph P Erinjeri; Majid Maybody; Heiko Schöder; Robert H Siegelbaum; Constantinos T Sofocleous; Joseph O Deasy; Stephen B Solomon; John L Humm; Assen S Kirov
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2015-02-26       Impact factor: 10.057

2.  Noise propagation in resolution modeled PET imaging and its impact on detectability.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jing Tang
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 3.  Resolution modeling in PET imaging: theory, practice, benefits, and pitfalls.

Authors:  Arman Rahmim; Jinyi Qi; Vesna Sossi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Effect of the positron range of 18F, 68Ga and 124I on PET/CT in lung-equivalent materials.

Authors:  Gerrit J Kemerink; Mariëlle G W Visser; Renee Franssen; Emiel Beijer; Mariangela Zamburlini; Servé G E A Halders; Boudewijn Brans; Felix M Mottaghy; Gerrit J J Teule
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  A residual correction method for high-resolution PET reconstruction with application to on-the-fly Monte Carlo based model of positron range.

Authors:  Lin Fu; Jinyi Qi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Improving PET Quantification of Small Animal [68Ga]DOTA-Labeled PET/CT Studies by Using a CT-Based Positron Range Correction.

Authors:  Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Juan José Vaquero; Joaquín L Herraiz; Mailyn Pérez-Liva; María Luisa Soto-Montenegro; Santiago Peña-Zalbidea; Manuel Desco; José Manuel Udías
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 7.  3D/4D Reconstruction and Quantitative Total Body Imaging.

Authors:  Jinyi Qi; Samuel Matej; Guobao Wang; Xuezhu Zhang
Journal:  PET Clin       Date:  2021-01

8.  Effects of magnetic fields of up to 9.4 T on resolution and contrast of PET images as measured with an MR-BrainPET.

Authors:  N Jon Shah; Hans Herzog; Christoph Weirich; Lutz Tellmann; Joachim Kaffanke; Liliana Caldeira; Elena Rota Kops; Syed M Qaim; Heinz H Coenen; Hidehiro Iida
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Implementation of a Spatially-Variant and Tissue-Dependent Positron Range Correction for PET/CT Imaging.

Authors:  Hunor Kertész; Thomas Beyer; Vladimir Panin; Walter Jentzen; Jacobo Cal-Gonzalez; Alexander Berger; Laszlo Papp; Peter L Kench; Deepak Bharkhada; Jorge Cabello; Maurizio Conti; Ivo Rausch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 4.566

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.