Literature DB >> 24838701

Semen quality, infertility and mortality in the USA.

Michael L Eisenberg, Shufeng Li, Barry Behr, Mark R Cullen, Deron Galusha, Dolores J Lamb, Larry I Lipshultz.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What is the relationship between semen parameters and mortality in men evaluated for infertility? SUMMARY ANSWER: Among men undergoing an infertility evaluation, those with abnormal semen parameters have a higher risk of death, suggesting a possible common etiology between infertility and mortality. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Conflicting data exist that suggest either an inverse relationship or no relationship between semen quality and mortality. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A study cohort was identified from two centers, each specializing in infertility care. In California, we identified men with data from 1994 to 2011 in the Stanford Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility semen database. In Texas, we identified men with data from 1989 to 2009 contained in the andrology database at the Baylor College of Medicine Special Procedures Laboratory who were evaluated for infertility. Mortality was determined by data linkage to the National Death Index or Social Security Death Index. Comorbidity was estimated based on calculation of the Charlson Comorbidity Index or Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services-Hierarchical Condition Categories Model. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: In all, 11,935 men were evaluated for infertility from 1989 to 2011. During 92 104 person years of follow-up, 69 of 11,935 men died (0.58%). The mean age at infertility evaluation was 36.6 years with a mean follow-up of 7.7 years. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Compared with the general population, men evaluated for infertility had a lower risk of death with 69 deaths observed compared with 176.7 expected (Standardized mortality rate 0.39, 95% CI 0.30-0.49). When stratified by semen parameters, however, men with impaired semen parameters (i.e. male factor infertility) had significantly higher mortality rates compared with men with normal parameters (i.e. no male factor infertility). Low semen volume, sperm concentration, sperm motility, total sperm count and total motile sperm count were all associated with higher risk of death. In contrast, abnormal sperm morphology was not associated with mortality. While adjusting for current health status attenuated the association between semen parameters and mortality, men with two or more abnormal semen parameters still had a 2.3-fold higher risk of death compared with men with normal semen (95% CI 1.12-4.65). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Our cohort represents infertile men, which may limit generalizability. As comorbidity relied on administrative data, granular information on each man regarding infertility diagnosis and lifestyle factors was unavailable. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Men with impaired semen parameters have an increased mortality rate in the years following an infertility evaluation suggesting semen quality may provide a marker of health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study is supported in part by P01HD36289 from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute for Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health (to D.J.L. and L.I.L.). The project was also partially supported by an NIH CTSA award number UL1 RR025744. None of the authors has any conflict of interest to declare.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838701      PMCID: PMC4059337          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu106

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  32 in total

1.  Endogenous testosterone and mortality due to all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer in men: European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) Prospective Population Study.

Authors:  Kay-Tee Khaw; Mitch Dowsett; Elizabeth Folkerd; Sheila Bingham; Nicholas Wareham; Robert Luben; Ailsa Welch; Nicholas Day
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Body-mass index and mortality among 1.46 million white adults.

Authors:  Amy Berrington de Gonzalez; Patricia Hartge; James R Cerhan; Alan J Flint; Lindsay Hannan; Robert J MacInnis; Steven C Moore; Geoffrey S Tobias; Hoda Anton-Culver; Laura Beane Freeman; W Lawrence Beeson; Sandra L Clipp; Dallas R English; Aaron R Folsom; D Michal Freedman; Graham Giles; Niclas Hakansson; Katherine D Henderson; Judith Hoffman-Bolton; Jane A Hoppin; Karen L Koenig; I-Min Lee; Martha S Linet; Yikyung Park; Gaia Pocobelli; Arthur Schatzkin; Howard D Sesso; Elisabete Weiderpass; Bradley J Willcox; Alicja Wolk; Anne Zeleniuch-Jacquotte; Walter C Willett; Michael J Thun
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Men who seek infertility care may not represent the general U.S. population: data from the National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  James M Hotaling; Michael T Davenport; Michael L Eisenberg; Stephen K VanDenEeden; Thomas J Walsh
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.649

Review 4.  Ensuring access to education and services on infertility for the underserved.

Authors:  Rosell L Jenkins
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2005

5.  Underascertainment of deaths using social security records: a recommended solution to a little-known problem.

Authors:  Jeanine M Buchanich; David G Dolan; Gary M Marsh; Jaime Madrigano
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-22       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Racial disparities in smoking-attributable mortality and years of potential life lost --- Missouri, 2003-2007.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Socioeconomic factors, health behaviors, and mortality: results from a nationally representative prospective study of US adults.

Authors:  P M Lantz; J S House; J M Lepkowski; D R Williams; R P Mero; J Chen
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1998-06-03       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.

Authors:  Anjani Chandra; Gladys M Martinez; William D Mosher; Joyce C Abma; Jo Jones
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 23       Date:  2005-12

Review 9.  World Health Organization reference values for human semen characteristics.

Authors:  Trevor G Cooper; Elizabeth Noonan; Sigrid von Eckardstein; Jacques Auger; H W Gordon Baker; Hermann M Behre; Trine B Haugen; Thinus Kruger; Christina Wang; Michael T Mbizvo; Kirsten M Vogelsong
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 15.610

10.  Risk adjustment of Medicare capitation payments using the CMS-HCC model.

Authors:  Gregory C Pope; John Kautter; Randall P Ellis; Arlene S Ash; John Z Ayanian; Lisa I Lezzoni; Melvin J Ingber; Jesse M Levy; John Robst
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  2004
View more
  61 in total

1.  Sperm mitochondrial DNA measures and semen parameters among men undergoing fertility treatment.

Authors:  Haotian Wu; Alexandra M Huffman; Brian W Whitcomb; Srinihaari Josyula; Suzanne Labrie; Ellen Tougias; Tayyab Rahil; Cynthia K Sites; Jonathan Richard Pilsner
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Online       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.828

Review 2.  The Exposome Research Paradigm: an Opportunity to Understand the Environmental Basis for Human Health and Disease.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Melissa M Smarr; Chirag J Patel
Journal:  Curr Environ Health Rep       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  Is human fecundity changing? A discussion of research and data gaps precluding us from having an answer.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Katherine J Sapra; Alison Gemmill; Linda G Kahn; Lauren A Wise; Courtney D Lynch; Pam Factor-Litvak; Sunni L Mumford; Niels E Skakkebaek; Rémy Slama; Danelle T Lobdell; Joseph B Stanford; Tina Kold Jensen; Elizabeth Heger Boyle; Michael L Eisenberg; Paul J Turek; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Marie E Thoma; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  Clustering of retrospectively reported and prospectively observed time-to-pregnancy.

Authors:  Katherine J Sapra; Alexander C McLain; José M Maisog; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 3.797

5.  Risk of childhood mortality in family members of men with poor semen quality.

Authors:  Heidi A Hanson; Erik N Mayer; Ross E Anderson; Kenneth I Aston; Douglas T Carrell; Justin Berger; William T Lowrance; Ken R Smith; James M Hotaling
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 6.  The Disappearing Sperms: Analysis of Reports Published Between 1980 and 2015.

Authors:  Pallav Sengupta; Sulagna Dutta; Elzbieta Krajewska-Kulak
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-04-19

7.  Association between sperm mitochondarial DNA copy number and nuclear DNA methylation.

Authors:  Oladele A Oluwayiose; Srinihaari Josyula; Emily Houle; Chelsea Marcho; Tayyab Rahil; Cynthia K Sites; J Richard Pilsner
Journal:  Epigenomics       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 4.778

8.  Semen analysis in patients treated for varicocele in pediatric age: are surgical outcomes enough to preserve the fertility potential?

Authors:  Nicola Zampieri; Francesco Saverio Camoglio
Journal:  Am J Clin Exp Urol       Date:  2018-06-15

9.  Orthotopic Ovarian Transplantation Procedures to Investigate the Life- and Health-span Influence of Ovarian Senescence in Female Mice.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Mason; Kate C Parkinson; Tracy L Habermehl
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 1.355

10.  Relationship between physical occupational exposures and health on semen quality: data from the Longitudinal Investigation of Fertility and the Environment (LIFE) Study.

Authors:  Michael L Eisenberg; Zhen Chen; Aijun Ye; Germaine M Buck Louis
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 7.329

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.