| Literature DB >> 28137753 |
Melissa M Smarr1, Katherine J Sapra1, Alison Gemmill2, Linda G Kahn3, Lauren A Wise4, Courtney D Lynch5, Pam Factor-Litvak3, Sunni L Mumford6, Niels E Skakkebaek7, Rémy Slama8, Danelle T Lobdell9, Joseph B Stanford10, Tina Kold Jensen7, Elizabeth Heger Boyle11, Michael L Eisenberg12, Paul J Turek13, Rajeshwari Sundaram14, Marie E Thoma15, Germaine M Buck Louis1.
Abstract
Fecundity, the biologic capacity to reproduce, is essential for the health of individuals and is, therefore, fundamental for understanding human health at the population level. Given the absence of a population (bio)marker, fecundity is assessed indirectly by various individual-based (e.g. semen quality, ovulation) or couple-based (e.g. time-to-pregnancy) endpoints. Population monitoring of fecundity is challenging, and often defaults to relying on rates of births (fertility) or adverse outcomes such as genitourinary malformations and reproductive site cancers. In light of reported declines in semen quality and fertility rates in some global regions among other changes, the question as to whether human fecundity is changing needs investigation. We review existing data and novel methodological approaches aimed at answering this question from a transdisciplinary perspective. The existing literature is insufficient for answering this question; we provide an overview of currently available resources and novel methods suitable for delineating temporal patterns in human fecundity in future research. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2017. This work is written by (a) US Government employee(s) and is in the public domain in the US.Entities:
Keywords: epidemiology; fecundity; fertility; gynecologic diseases; time-to-pregnancy; urologic diseases
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28137753 PMCID: PMC5850610 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew361
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Reprod ISSN: 0268-1161 Impact factor: 6.918