Literature DB >> 24838551

Memory-guided obstacle crossing: more failures were observed for the trail limb versus lead limb.

Michel J H Heijnen1, Nathaniel L Romine, Dana M Stumpf, Shirley Rietdyk.   

Abstract

During adaptive locomotion, vision is used to guide the lead limb; however, the individual must rely on knowledge of obstacle height and position, termed obstacle memory, to guide the trail limb. Previous research has demonstrated that visual sampling of the obstacle during approach was adequate to provide obstacle height information, but online visual update of distance to the obstacle was required to plan and implement appropriate foot placement. Our purpose was to determine whether obstacle height memory, coupled with a visible obstacle position cue, could successfully guide the foot during obstacle crossing. Subjects first stepped over an obstacle for 25 trials; then, the obstacle was removed, but its position was marked with high-contrast tape; subjects were instructed to step over the obstacle as if it was still there (termed "virtual obstacle") for 25 trials. No changes in foot placement were observed; therefore, the position cue provided salient online information to guide foot placement. Average failure rates (subject would have contacted the virtual obstacle if it was present) were 9 and 47 % (lead and trail limb, respectively). Therefore, action was impaired for both limbs when guided by obstacle height memory, but action was impaired to a greater extent for the trail limb. Therefore, viewing the obstacle during approach appears to facilitate the memory needed to guide obstacle crossing, particularly for the trail limb. This is likely because the lead limb is visible in the peripheral visual field during crossing, but the trail limb is not.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24838551     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3903-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  38 in total

1.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion.

Authors:  A. E. Patla; S. Rietdyk; C. Martin; S. Prentice
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  Neurons in area 5 of the posterior parietal cortex in the cat contribute to interlimb coordination during visually guided locomotion: a role in working memory.

Authors:  Kim Lajoie; Jacques-Etienne Andujar; Keir Pearson; Trevor Drew
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The dynamics of perception and action.

Authors:  William H Warren
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.

Authors:  Shirley Rietdyk; Chris K Rhea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Attentional demands of postural control: the ability to selectively allocate information-processing resources.

Authors:  Ka-Chun Siu; Marjorie H Woollacott
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-03-22       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Stepping of the forelegs over obstacles establishes long-lasting memories in cats.

Authors:  David A McVea; Keir G Pearson
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults.

Authors:  H C Chen; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-11

8.  The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming.

Authors:  D Elliott
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1988-03

9.  The contribution of vision, proprioception, and efference copy in storing a neural representation for guiding trail leg trajectory over an obstacle.

Authors:  Kim Lajoie; Leigh W Bloomfield; Fraser J Nelson; Jaewon J Suh; Daniel S Marigold
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  13 in total

1.  Stability of hand force production. II. Ascending and descending synergies.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  An altered spatiotemporal gait adjustment during a virtual obstacle crossing task in patients with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Authors:  Chun-Kai Huang; Vijay Shivaswamy; Pariwat Thaisetthawatkul; Lynn Mack; Nicholas Stergiou; Ka-Chun Siu
Journal:  J Diabetes Complications       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 2.852

3.  Unintentional force changes in cyclical tasks performed by an abundant system: Empirical observations and a dynamical model.

Authors:  Sasha Reschechtko; Fariba Hasanbarani; Vladimir M Akulin; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-03-24       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Contributions of Parietal Cortex to the Working Memory of an Obstacle Acquired Visually or Tactilely in the Locomoting Cat.

Authors:  Carmen Wong; Keir G Pearson; Stephen G Lomber
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Failures in adaptive locomotion: trial-and-error exploration to determine adequate foot elevation over obstacles.

Authors:  Michel J H Heijnen; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-11-08       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Unintentional drifts during quiet stance and voluntary body sway.

Authors:  Omid Rasouli; Stanisław Solnik; Mariusz P Furmanek; Daniele Piscitelli; Ali Falaki; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Optimality and stability of intentional and unintentional actions: I. Origins of drifts in performance.

Authors:  Behnoosh Parsa; Alexander Terekhov; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Quick foot placement adjustments during gait: direction matters.

Authors:  Wouter Hoogkamer; Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Unsteady steady-states: central causes of unintentional force drift.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Daniela Mattos; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Association of age-related cognitive and obstacle avoidance performances.

Authors:  Ryota Sakurai; Kentaro Kodama; Yu Ozawa; Frederico Pieruccini-Faria; Kimi Estela Kobayashi-Cuya; Susumu Ogawa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.