Literature DB >> 12529222

Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion.

A. E. Patla1, S. Rietdyk, C. Martin, S. Prentice.   

Abstract

The issues explored in this article are the role of exproprioceptive input and the nature of exteroceptive input provided by the visual system in the control of limb elevation as obstacles are stepped over during locomotion. In the first experiment, the differences in limb trajectory of movements over solid and fragile obstacles of similar dimensions were examined. Subjects increased their toe clearance, vertical position of the hip, and the hip vertical velocity when going over a fragile obstacle with the leading limb. This suggests that in addition to visually observable properties of obstacles such as height or width, other properties, such as rigidity or fragility, which may be classified as visually inferred, also influence the limb trajectory. Part of the first and the second experiment was focused on understanding differences in leading limb and trailing limb trajectory over obstacles. The toe clearance of the trailing limb was lower for smaller obstacles. There was no consistent correlation between the toe clearance values of the leading and trailing limbs. The variability in toe clearance was higher for the trailing limb, which is attributable to lack of visual exproprioceptive input about trailing limb movements and to the shorter time available following toe-off to fine-tune the trailing limb trajectory. Because the body center of mass is moving toward the supporting foot when the trailing limb goes over obstacles and the trailing limb foot is moving up, the chances of a trip are minimized and recovery from an unexpected trip are more likely. These results highlight the role of exproprioceptive input provided by the visual system and possible cognitive influences on the limb trajectory as one travels over uneven terrains.

Entities:  

Year:  1996        PMID: 12529222     DOI: 10.1080/00222895.1996.9941731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  26 in total

1.  Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.

Authors:  Shirley Rietdyk; Chris K Rhea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Three-dimensional kinematics and dynamics of the foot during walking: a model of central control mechanisms.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Osaki; Mikhail Kunin; Bernard Cohen; Theodore Raphan
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Differential activity-dependent development of corticospinal control of movement and final limb position during visually guided locomotion.

Authors:  K M Friel; T Drew; J H Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-03-21       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion.

Authors:  Amir A Mohagheghi; Renato Moraes; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Obstacle avoidance during locomotion using haptic information in normally sighted humans.

Authors:  Aftab E Patla; T Claire Davies; Ewa Niechwiej
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Segmental control for adaptive locomotor adjustments during obstacle clearance in healthy young adults.

Authors:  Michael J Maclellan; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Effect of Fatigue on Electromyographic Characteristics during Obstacle Crossing of Different Heights in Young Adults.

Authors:  Christos Antonopoulos; Dimitrios Patikas; Nikolaos Koutlianos; Sofia D Papadopoulou; Dimitrios Chatzopoulos; Konstantinos Hatzikotoulas; Eleni Bassa; Christos Kotzamanidis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Erika E Howe; Adam J Toth; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effects of shoe traction and obstacle height on lower extremity coordination dynamics during walking.

Authors:  Leslie Decker; Jeremy J Houser; John M Noble; Gregory M Karst; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.