Literature DB >> 16421728

Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.

Shirley Rietdyk1, Chris K Rhea.   

Abstract

Visual information regarding obstacle position and size is used for planning and controlling adaptive gait. However, the manner in which visual cues in the environment are used in the control of gait is not fully known. This research examined the effect of obstacle position cues on the lead and trail limb trajectories during obstacle avoidance with and without visual information of the lower limbs and obstacle (termed visual exproprioception). Eight subjects stepped over obstacles under four visual conditions: full vision without obstacle position cues, full vision with position cues, goggles without position cues and goggles with position cues. Goggles obstructed visual exproprioception of the lower limbs and the obstacle. Position cues (2 m tall) were placed beside the obstacle to provide visual cues regarding obstacle position. Obstacle heights were 2, 10, 20 and 30 cm. When wearing goggles and without position cues, a majority of the dependent measures (horizontal distance, toe clearance and lead stride length) increased for the 10, 20 and 30 cm obstacles. Therefore lower limb-obstacle visual exproprioception was important for the control of both limbs, even though with normal vision the trail limb was not visible during obstacle clearance. When wearing goggles, the presence of position cues, which provided on-line visual exproprioception of the self relative to the obstacle position in the anterior-posterior direction, returned lead and trail foot placements to full vision values. Lead toe clearance was not affected by the position cues, trail clearance decreased but was greater than values observed during full vision. Therefore, visual exproprioception of obstacle location, provided by visual cues in the environment, was more relevant than visual exproprioception of the lower limbs for controlling lead and trail foot placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16421728     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0345-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  9 in total

1.  Locomotor Patterns of the Leading and the Trailing Limbs as Solid and Fragile Obstacles Are Stepped Over: Some Insights Into the Role of Vision During Locomotion.

Authors:  A. E. Patla; S. Rietdyk; C. Martin; S. Prentice
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.328

2.  The role of visual information in control of a constrained locomotor task.

Authors:  M Laurent; J A Thomson
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.328

3.  Proactive stability control while carrying loads and negotiating an elevated surface.

Authors:  Shirley Rietdyk; James D McGlothlin; Joshua L Williams; Alexis T Baria
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-07       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults.

Authors:  H C Chen; J A Ashton-Miller; N B Alexander; A B Schultz
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1991-11

5.  The effects of distant and on-line visual information on the control of approach phase and step over an obstacle during locomotion.

Authors:  Amir A Mohagheghi; Renato Moraes; Aftab E Patla
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-10       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Placing the trailing foot closer to an obstacle reduces flexion of the hip, knee, and ankle to increase the risk of tripping.

Authors:  L S Chou; L F Draganich
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Children use different anticipatory control strategies than adults to circumvent an obstacle in the travel path.

Authors:  Lori Ann Vallis; Bradford J McFadyen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Background visual cues and memory-guided reaching.

Authors:  Olav Krigolson; Matthew Heath
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.161

9.  Where and when do we look as we approach and step over an obstacle in the travel path?

Authors:  A E Patla; J N Vickers
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1997-12-01       Impact factor: 1.837

  9 in total
  29 in total

1.  Age-related kinematic changes in late visual-cueing during obstacle circumvention.

Authors:  Maxime R Paquette; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Visuomotor control of step descent: evidence of specialised role of the lower visual field.

Authors:  Matthew A Timmis; Simon J Bennett; John G Buckley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The affordance of barrier crossing in young children exhibits dynamic, not geometric, similarity.

Authors:  Winona Snapp-Childs; Geoffrey P Bingham
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensorimotor integration of vision and proprioception for obstacle crossing in ambulatory individuals with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Raza Naseem Malik; Rachel Cote; Tania Lam
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Erika E Howe; Adam J Toth; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Factors leading to obstacle contact during adaptive locomotion.

Authors:  Michel J H Heijnen; Brittney C Muir; Shirley Rietdyk
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Visual deprivation is met with active changes in ground reaction forces to minimize worsening balance and stability during walking.

Authors:  Otella Shoja; Alireza Farsi; Farzad Towhidkhah; Anatol G Feldman; Behrouz Abdoli; Alireza Bahramian
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The influence of carrying an anterior load on attention demand and obstacle clearance before, during, and after obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Deborah A Jehu; Deanna Saunders; Natalie Richer; Nicole Paquet; Yves Lajoie
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Control of vertical posture while elevating one foot to avoid a real or virtual obstacle.

Authors:  Hirofumi Ida; Sambit Mohapatra; Alexander Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of visual deprivation on intra-limb coordination during walking in children and adults.

Authors:  Ann Hallemans; Peter Aerts
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.