Literature DB >> 28477042

Unintentional drifts during quiet stance and voluntary body sway.

Omid Rasouli1,2,3, Stanisław Solnik4,5, Mariusz P Furmanek3,6, Daniele Piscitelli3,7, Ali Falaki3, Mark L Latash8.   

Abstract

We explored unintentional drifts in voluntary whole-body sway tasks following the removal of visual feedback. The main hypothesis was that the unintentional drifts were produced by drifts of referent coordinates for salient performance variables. Young healthy subjects stood quietly on a force platform and also performed voluntary body sway at 0.5 Hz both in the anterio-posterior and medio-lateral directions. Visual feedback on the center of pressure (COP) coordinate was provided and then turned off. During quiet stance trials, the subjects matched the initial COP coordinate with a target shifted by 3 cm anterior, posterior, left, or right from the coordinate during natural standing and activated the right tibialis anterior to 30% of its maximal voluntary contraction. During cyclical voluntary sway task, the nominal sway amplitude was always 4 cm while the midpoint was at one of the four mentioned locations. Removing visual feedback caused COP drifts during quiet stance trials that were consistent across trials performed by a subject but could be in opposite directions across subjects; there was a consistent drop in the activation level of tibialis anterior. During voluntary body sway, removing visual feedback caused a consistent increase in the voluntary sway amplitude and a drift of the midpoint that was consistent within but not across subjects. Motor equivalent and non-motor equivalent inter-cycle motion components were quantified within the space of muscle groups (muscle modes) under visual feedback and at the end of the period without visual feedback. Throughout the trial, there were large motor equivalent motion components, and they increased over the period without visual feedback. The results corroborate the idea that referent coordinate drifts at different levels of the control hierarchy can lead to unintentional drifts in performance. It suggests that directions of COP drifts are defined by two main factors, drift of the body referent coordinate toward the actual coordinate (that can lead to fall) and an opposite drift to ensure body motion to a safer location. Analysis of motor equivalence suggests that postural stability is not compromised during unintentional drifts in performance in contrast to earlier studies of multi-finger tasks. This may be due to the vital importance of postural stability for everyday actions.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Drift; Motor equivalence; Posture; Referent coordinate; Sway

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28477042      PMCID: PMC5506379          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-4972-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  65 in total

Review 1.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Temporal capacity of short-term visuomotor memory in continuous force production.

Authors:  David E Vaillancourt; Daniel M Russell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The nature of constant and cyclic force production: unintentional force-drift characteristics.

Authors:  Satyajit Ambike; Daniela Mattos; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Patterns of center of presure migration during prolonged unconstrained standing.

Authors:  M Duarte; V M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.422

6.  Unpredictable elbow joint perturbation during reaching results in multijoint motor equivalence.

Authors:  D J S Mattos; M L Latash; E Park; J Kuhl; J P Scholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Internal models in the cerebellum.

Authors:  D M Wolpert; R C Miall; M Kawato
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  1998-09-01       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Characteristics of unintentional movements by a multijoint effector.

Authors:  Tao Zhou; Lei Zhang; Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.328

9.  Biological Movement and Laws of Physics.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 1.422

10.  Visual control of isometric force in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  D E Vaillancourt; A B Slifkin; K M Newell
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.139

View more
  6 in total

1.  Perturbation-induced fast drifts in finger enslaving.

Authors:  Joseph Ricotta; Cristian Cuadra; Jacob S Evans; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Beyond rambling and trembling: effects of visual feedback on slow postural drift.

Authors:  Momoko Yamagata; Marta Popow; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-01-11       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Production and Perception of Intentional and Unintentional Actions.

Authors:  Mark L Latash
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Balance Adaptation While Standing on a Compliant Base Depends on the Current Sensory Condition in Healthy Young Adults.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-03-25       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Incongruity of Geometric and Spectral Markers in the Assessment of Body Sway.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Shashank Ghai; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 4.086

6.  Adaptation of balancing behaviour during continuous perturbations of stance. Supra-postural visual tasks and platform translation frequency modulate adaptation rate.

Authors:  Stefania Sozzi; Antonio Nardone; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.