Literature DB >> 1940078

Stepping over obstacles: gait patterns of healthy young and old adults.

H C Chen1, J A Ashton-Miller, N B Alexander, A B Schultz.   

Abstract

Falls associated with tripping over an obstacle can be devastating to elderly individuals, yet little is known about the strategies used for stepping over obstacles by either old or young adults. The gait of gender-matched groups of 24 young and 24 old healthy adults (mean ages 22 and 71 years) was studied during a 4 m approach to and while stepping over obstacles of 0, 25, 51, or 152 mm height and in level obstacle-free walking. Optoelectronic cameras and recorders were used to record approach and obstacle crossing speeds as well as bilateral lower extremity kinematic parameters that described foot placement and movement trajectories relative to the obstacle. The results showed that age had no effect on minimum swing foot clearance (FC) over an obstacle. For the 25 mm obstacle, mean FC was 64 mm, or approximately three times that used in level gait; FC increased nonlinearly with obstacle height for all subjects. Although no age differences were found in obstacle-free gait, old adults exhibited a significantly more conservative strategy when crossing obstacles, with slower crossing speed, shorter step length, and shorter obstacle-heel strike distance. In addition, the old adults crossed the obstacle so that it was 10% further forward in their obstacle-crossing step. Although all subjects successfully avoided the riskiest form of obstacle contact, tripping, 4/24 healthy old adults stepped on an obstacle, demonstrating an increased risk for obstacle contact with age.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1940078     DOI: 10.1093/geronj/46.6.m196

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gerontol        ISSN: 0022-1422


  53 in total

1.  Football boot insoles and sensitivity to extent of ankle inversion movement.

Authors:  G Waddington; R Adams
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  The modified Gait Efficacy Scale: establishing the psychometric properties in older adults.

Authors:  Alaina M Newell; Jessie M VanSwearingen; Elizabeth Hile; Jennifer S Brach
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2011-11-10

3.  Two-stage muscle activity responses in decisions about leg movement adjustments during trip recovery.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Mirjam Pijnappels; Sabine Verschueren; Jaap van Dieën; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Control of adaptive locomotion: effect of visual obstruction and visual cues in the environment.

Authors:  Shirley Rietdyk; Chris K Rhea
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Age-related changes in avoidance strategies when negotiating single and multiple obstacles.

Authors:  Catherine R Lowrey; Ashley Watson; Lori Ann Vallis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-06       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 6.  Neuromuscular strategies for the transitions between level and hill surfaces during walking.

Authors:  Jinger S Gottschall; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Strategies for obstacle avoidance during walking in the cat.

Authors:  Kevin M I Chu; Sandy H Seto; Irina N Beloozerova; Vladimir Marlinski
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 8.  Online adjustments of leg movements in healthy young and old.

Authors:  Zrinka Potocanac; Jacques Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-05-06       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Online visual cues can compensate for deficits in cutaneous feedback from the dorsal ankle joint for the trailing limb but not the leading limb during obstacle crossing.

Authors:  Erika E Howe; Adam J Toth; Leah R Bent
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  The effects of shoe traction and obstacle height on lower extremity coordination dynamics during walking.

Authors:  Leslie Decker; Jeremy J Houser; John M Noble; Gregory M Karst; Nicholas Stergiou
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 3.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.