Literature DB >> 24833134

Maltodextrin and fat preference deficits in "taste-blind" P2X2/P2X3 knockout mice.

Anthony Sclafani1, Karen Ackroff2.   

Abstract

Adenosine triphosphate is a critical neurotransmitter in the gustatory response to the 5 primary tastes in mice. Genetic deletion of the purinergic P2X2/P2X3 receptor greatly reduces the neural and behavioral response to prototypical primary taste stimuli. In this study, we examined the behavioral response of P2X double knockout mice to maltodextrin and fat stimuli, which appear to activate additional taste channels. P2X double knockout and wild-type mice were given 24-h choice tests (vs. water) with ascending concentrations of Polycose and Intralipid. In Experiment 1, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.5-4%) Polycose solutions but preferred concentrated (8-32%) Polycose to water. In a retest, the Polycose-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, preferred all Polycose concentrations. In Experiment 2, naive double knockout mice, unlike wild-type mice, were indifferent to dilute (0.313-2.5%) Intralipid emulsions but preferred concentrated (5-20%) Intralipid to water. In a retest, the fat-experienced double knockout mice, like wild-type mice, strongly preferred 0.313-5% Intralipid to water. These results indicate that the inherent preferences of mice for maltodextrin and fat are dependent upon adenosine triphosphate taste cell signaling. With experience, however, P2X double knockout mice develop strong preferences for the nontaste flavor qualities of maltodextrin and fat conditioned by the postoral actions of these nutrients.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intralipid; Polycose; experience; postoral conditioning

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24833134      PMCID: PMC4064957          DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bju019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  43 in total

1.  Nutrient preference and diet-induced adiposity in C57BL/6ByJ and 129P3/J mice.

Authors:  A A Bachmanov; D R Reed; M G Tordoff; R A Price; G K Beauchamp
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2001-03

Review 2.  Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance.

Authors:  Asker E Jeukendrup; Edward S Chambers
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.294

3.  Orosensory detection of sucrose, maltose, and glucose is severely impaired in mice lacking T1R2 or T1R3, but Polycose sensitivity remains relatively normal.

Authors:  Yada Treesukosol; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 3.619

4.  Carbohydrate in the mouth immediately facilitates motor output.

Authors:  Nicholas Gant; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-04-11       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Post-oral fat stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: A concentration-response study.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-02-28

6.  Post-oral glucose stimulation of intake and conditioned flavor preference in C57BL/6J mice: a concentration-response study.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2012-11-28

7.  T1R3 taste receptor is critical for sucrose but not Polycose taste.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 8.  The sixth taste?

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 9.  Carbohydrate taste, appetite, and obesity: an overview.

Authors:  A Sclafani
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Food reward in the absence of taste receptor signaling.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Albino J Oliveira-Maia; Tatyana D Sotnikova; Raul R Gainetdinov; Marc G Caron; Miguel A L Nicolelis; Sidney A Simon
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 2.  Lipids and obesity: Also a matter of taste?

Authors:  Philippe Besnard
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 6.514

3.  Maltodextrin Acceptance and Preference in Eight Mouse Strains.

Authors:  Rachel L Poole; Tiffany R Aleman; Hillary T Ellis; Michael G Tordoff
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 3.160

4.  Greater reductions in fat preferences in CALHM1 than CD36 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Nutrient-conditioned intake stimulation does not require a distinctive flavor cue in rats.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.868

6.  Behavioral evidence that select carbohydrate stimuli activate T1R-independent receptor mechanisms.

Authors:  Alan C Spector; Lindsey A Schier
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 3.868

7.  Fat preference deficits and experience-induced recovery in global taste-deficient Trpm5 and Calhm1 knockout mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2022-01-06

8.  Residual Glucose Taste in T1R3 Knockout but not TRPM5 Knockout Mice.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Steven Zukerman; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-05-15

9.  Post-oral sugar detection rapidly and chemospecifically modulates taste-guided behavior.

Authors:  Lindsey A Schier; Alan C Spector
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 3.619

10.  Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of Fat Taste Perception.

Authors:  Aziz Hichami; Amira Sayed Khan; Naim Akhtar Khan
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2022
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.