Literature DB >> 20453646

Oral carbohydrate sensing and exercise performance.

Asker E Jeukendrup1, Edward S Chambers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Carbohydrate during exercise has been demonstrated to improve exercise performance even when the exercise is of high intensity (>75% VO2max) and relatively short duration (approximately 1 h). It has become clear that the underlying mechanisms for the ergogenic effect during this type of activity are not metabolic but may reside in the central nervous system. RECENT
FINDINGS: Carbohydrate mouth rinses have been shown to result in similar performance improvements. This would suggest that the beneficial effects of carbohydrate feeding during exercise are not confined to its conventional metabolic advantage but may also serve as a positive afferent signal capable of modifying motor output. These effects are specific to carbohydrate and are independent of taste. The receptors in the oral cavity have not (yet) been identified and the exact role of various brain areas is not clearly understood. Further research is warranted to fully understand the separate taste transduction pathways for simple and complex carbohydrates and how these differ between mammalian species, particularly in humans.
SUMMARY: Carbohydrate is detected in oral cavity by unidentified receptors and this can be linked to improvements in exercise performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20453646     DOI: 10.1097/MCO.0b013e328339de83

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care        ISSN: 1363-1950            Impact factor:   4.294


  34 in total

Review 1.  Role of gut nutrient sensing in stimulating appetite and conditioning food preferences.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani; Karen Ackroff
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.619

Review 2.  From appetite setpoint to appetition: 50years of ingestive behavior research.

Authors:  Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2018-01-02

Review 3.  Fatigue and pacing in high-intensity intermittent team sport: an update.

Authors:  Mark Waldron; Jamie Highton
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Mouth rinsing with a bitter solution without ingestion does not improve sprint cycling performance.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Mark Tan; Kym J Guelfi; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 5.  New Insights into Enhancing Maximal Exercise Performance Through the Use of a Bitter Tastant.

Authors:  Sharon Gam; Kym J Guelfi; Paul A Fournier
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Running Performance With Nutritive and Nonnutritive Sweetened Mouth Rinses.

Authors:  Keely R Hawkins; Sridevi Krishnan; Lara Ringos; Vanessa Garcia; Jamie A Cooper
Journal:  Int J Sports Physiol Perform       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.010

7.  Rats' preferences for high fructose corn syrup vs. sucrose and sugar mixtures.

Authors:  Karen Ackroff; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-01-12

8.  Impact of T1r3 and Trpm5 on carbohydrate preference and acceptance in C57BL/6 mice.

Authors:  Steven Zukerman; John I Glendinning; Robert F Margolskee; Anthony Sclafani
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 3.160

Review 9.  Fructose-Glucose Composite Carbohydrates and Endurance Performance: Critical Review and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  David S Rowlands; S Houltham; K Musa-Veloso; F Brown; L Paulionis; D Bailey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Effects of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse on Cycling Time Trial Performance: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Cayque Brietzke; Paulo Estevão Franco-Alvarenga; Hélio José Coelho-Júnior; Rodrigo Silveira; Ricardo Yukio Asano; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 11.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.