Literature DB >> 24819322

Corneal biomechanical properties measured by the ocular response analyzer in acromegalic patients.

Emine Sen1, Yasemin Tutuncu, Melike Balikoglu-Yilmaz, Ufuk Elgin, Dilek Berker, Faruk Ozturk, Serdar Guler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of acromegaly on corneal biomechanical parameters.
METHODS: This cross-sectional, comparative clinical study included 34 acromegalic patients and 30 age-matched and sex-matched healthy controls. Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann-correlated and corneal-compensated intraocular pressure (IOPg and IOPcc, respectively) were measured using the Ocular Response Analyzer. Central corneal thickness (CCT) was determined with the ultrasonic pachymeter.
RESULTS: The mean duration of disease for the acromegalic patients was 5.3 years. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding mean CH, CRF, IOPg and IOPcc values. The respective mean values in patients with acromegaly and controls were 10.3 ± 2.2 and 9.5 ± 1.5 mmHg (p = 0.13) for CH; 10.5 ± 2.4 and 9.7 ± 1.7 mmHg (p = 0.16) for CRF, 16.1 ± 3.6 and 15.5 ± 2.9 mmHg (p = 0.49) for IOPg, 16.8 ± 3.4 and 17.0 ± 2.8 mmHg (p = 0.82) for IOPcc, and 544.8 ± 32.2 and 530.7 ± 22.9 μm (p = 0.05) for CCT. A significant moderate correlation was detected between the duration of acromegaly and IOPg OD (r = 0.430, p = 0.01). There was no significant correlation between other ocular parameters and levels of GH and IGF-1 at the time of diagnosis, the status of control, adenoma type, radiotherapy treatment, and drug usage.
CONCLUSIONS: In acromegalic patients, the duration of disease was correlated with IOPg OD level. Corneal biomechanical parameters and CCT values were not significantly different than those in age-matched and sex-matched healthy individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24819322     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-014-2653-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  33 in total

1.  Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer.

Authors:  David A Luce
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Corneal biomechanical properties in normal, post-laser in situ keratomileusis, and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Dolores Ortiz; David Piñero; Mohamed H Shabayek; Francisco Arnalich-Montiel; Jorge L Alió
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.351

3.  Diurnal variation of corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure in normal subjects.

Authors:  Banu Oncel; Umut Asli Dinc; Ebru Gorgun; Belkis Ilgaz Yalvaç
Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol       Date:  2009 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.597

Review 4.  Human corneal thickness and its impact on intraocular pressure measures: a review and meta-analysis approach.

Authors:  M J Doughty; M L Zaman
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2000 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  Corneal biomechanical properties of patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  Ahmet Ozkok; Esra Hatipoglu; Nevbahar Tamcelik; Burcu Balta; Ahmet Sadi Gundogdu; Mehmet Akif Ozdamar; Pinar Kadioglu
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Ocular response analyser to assess hysteresis and corneal resistance factor in low tension, open angle glaucoma and ocular hypertension.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammad Laiquzzaman; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 4.207

7.  Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes.

Authors:  Sunil Shah; Mohammed Laiquzzaman; Rajan Bhojwani; Sanjay Mantry; Ian Cunliffe
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Ocular Response Analyzer in subjects with and without glaucoma.

Authors:  Michael Sullivan-Mee; Shavon C Billingsley; Amita D Patel; Kathy D Halverson; Brooks R Alldredge; Clifford Qualls
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 9.  Guidelines for acromegaly management: an update.

Authors:  S Melmed; A Colao; A Barkan; M Molitch; A B Grossman; D Kleinberg; D Clemmons; P Chanson; E Laws; J Schlechte; M L Vance; K Ho; A Giustina
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Central corneal thickness and intraocular tension in patients with acromegaly.

Authors:  T Bramsen; A Klauber; P Bjerre
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1980-12
View more
  1 in total

1.  Ocular findings in Sheehan's syndrome.

Authors:  Murat Atmaca; Esra Kızıldağ; Zehra Candan; Mehmet Fatih Özbay; İsmet Seven
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-01-10       Impact factor: 3.117

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.