Literature DB >> 24815283

Understanding the mechanisms underlying voluntary responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback.

Sona Patel1, Cristina Nishimura1, Anjli Lodhavia1, Oleg Korzyukov1, Amy Parkinson2, Donald A Robin2, Charles R Larson1.   

Abstract

Previous research has shown that vocal errors can be simulated using a pitch perturbation technique. Two types of responses are observed when subjects are asked to ignore changes in pitch during a steady vowel production, a compensatory response countering the direction of the perceived change in pitch and a following response in the same direction as the pitch perturbation. The present study investigated the nature of these responses by asking subjects to volitionally change their voice fundamental frequency either in the opposite direction ("opposing" group) or the same direction ("following" group) as the pitch shifts (±100 cents, 1000 ms) presented during the speaker's production of an /a/ vowel. Results showed that voluntary responses that followed the stimulus directions had significantly shorter latencies (150 ms) than opposing responses (360 ms). In addition, prior to the slower voluntary opposing responses, there were short latency involuntary responses that followed the stimulus direction. These following responses may involve mechanisms of imitation or vocal shadowing of acoustical stimuli when subjects are predisposed to respond to a change in frequency of a sound. The slower opposing responses may represent a control strategy that requires monitoring and correcting for errors between the feedback signal and the intended vocal goal.

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24815283      PMCID: PMC4032396          DOI: 10.1121/1.4870490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  53 in total

1.  Understanding the neural mechanisms involved in sensory control of voice production.

Authors:  Amy L Parkinson; Sabina G Flagmeier; Jordan L Manes; Charles R Larson; Bill Rogers; Donald A Robin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Adaptive auditory feedback control of the production of formant trajectories in the Mandarin triphthong /iau/ and its pattern of generalization.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Voice F0 responses to pitch-shifted voice feedback during English speech.

Authors:  Stephanie H Chen; Hanjun Liu; Yi Xu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Laryngeal electromyographic responses to perturbations in voice pitch auditory feedback.

Authors:  Hanjun Liu; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Michel Bove; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Prefrontal cortex deactivation in macaques alters activity in the superior colliculus and impairs voluntary control of saccades.

Authors:  Michael J Koval; Stephen G Lomber; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Opposing and following vocal responses to pitch-shifted auditory feedback: evidence for different mechanisms of voice pitch control.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Oleg Korzyukov; Lindsey Sattler; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Selective attention from voluntary control of neurons in prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Robert J Schafer; Tirin Moore
Journal:  Science       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Performance characterization of human pitch control system: an acoustic approach.

Authors:  M Jafari; K H Wong; K Behbehani; G V Kondraske
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Vocalization-induced enhancement of the auditory cortex responsiveness during voice F0 feedback perturbation.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Laura Karvelis; Hanjun Liu; Charles R Larson
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Sensory-motor interactions for vocal pitch monitoring in non-primary human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jeremy D W Greenlee; Roozbeh Behroozmand; Charles R Larson; Adam W Jackson; Fangxiang Chen; Daniel R Hansen; Hiroyuki Oya; Hiroto Kawasaki; Matthew A Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  9 in total

1.  Auditory-Motor Perturbations of Voice Fundamental Frequency: Feedback Delay and Amplification.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Defne Abur; Nicole M Enos; Katherine M Brown; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Modulation of auditory-vocal feedback control due to planned changes in voice fo.

Authors:  Jason H Kim; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory and somatosensory feedback mechanisms of laryngeal and articulatory speech motor control.

Authors:  Hasini R Weerathunge; Tiffany Voon; Monique Tardif; Dante Cilento; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 2.064

4.  Pediatric Responses to Fundamental and Formant Frequency Altered Auditory Feedback: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Caitlin Coughler; Keelia L Quinn de Launay; David W Purcell; Janis Oram Cardy; Deryk S Beal
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.473

5.  Comparison of volitional opposing and following responses across speakers with different vocal histories.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Li Gao; Sophie Wang; Christine Gou; Jordan Manes; Donald A Robin; Charles R Larson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Attention modulates cortical processing of pitch feedback errors in voice control.

Authors:  Huijing Hu; Ying Liu; Zhiqiang Guo; Weifeng Li; Peng Liu; Shaozhen Chen; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  The Effects of Fluency Enhancing Conditions on Sensorimotor Control of Speech in Typically Fluent Speakers: An EEG Mu Rhythm Study.

Authors:  Tiffani Kittilstved; Kevin J Reilly; Ashley W Harkrider; Devin Casenhiser; David Thornton; David E Jenson; Tricia Hedinger; Andrew L Bowers; Tim Saltuklaroglu
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Online Adaptation to Altered Auditory Feedback Is Predicted by Auditory Acuity and Not by Domain-General Executive Control Resources.

Authors:  Clara D Martin; Caroline A Niziolek; Jon A Duñabeitia; Alejandro Perez; Doris Hernandez; Manuel Carreiras; John F Houde
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Decreased Gray-Matter Volume in Insular Cortex as a Correlate of Singers' Enhanced Sensorimotor Control of Vocal Production.

Authors:  Wenda Wang; Lirao Wei; Na Chen; Jeffery A Jones; Gaolang Gong; Hanjun Liu
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 4.677

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.